34For this reason, when operators are encounter<strong>in</strong>g methane, they should calibrate <strong>for</strong> methane.On the other hand, if higher hydrocarbons are be<strong>in</strong>g encountered, operators should calibrate witha higher hydrocarbon, such as pentane or propane.Calibration-sampl<strong>in</strong>g correction value tables <strong>for</strong> avariety of combustible gases are readily available[Industrial Scientific Corp. 2004]. More <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mationon the response of catalytic sensors to differentgases is available from Firth et al. [1973].MISINTERPRETING WARNING SIGNSIt is not unusual to mis<strong>in</strong>terpret a gas warn<strong>in</strong>g sign, especially <strong>in</strong> underground work<strong>in</strong>gs thoughtto have no gas. A primary reason is that the gas flow varies with the excavation rate. Suppose,<strong>for</strong> example, a tunnel-bor<strong>in</strong>g mach<strong>in</strong>e (TBM) beg<strong>in</strong>s to cut <strong>in</strong>to an area of gassy ground, releas<strong>in</strong>gmethane <strong>in</strong>to the ventilation air. The mach<strong>in</strong>e-mounted monitor on the TBM senses this gasand shuts it down. After spend<strong>in</strong>g some time track<strong>in</strong>g down the source of the shutdown andfigur<strong>in</strong>g out what to do, a worker beg<strong>in</strong>s to hunt <strong>for</strong> gas with a handheld detector. The workerhunt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> gas cannot f<strong>in</strong>d much because the emission dropped when the TBM stopped. Thus,everyone concludes that the monitor on the TBM is not work<strong>in</strong>g properly. Given two <strong>in</strong>struments,one with bad news and the other with good news, the tendency is to believe the goodnews. However, when methane detection and monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>struments fail, they rarely give afalse alarm or a false high read<strong>in</strong>g; <strong>in</strong> other words, they rarely <strong>in</strong>dicate gas when there is none.The usual failure mode is to not register gas that is present. There<strong>for</strong>e, when any <strong>in</strong>strumentregisters gas, it is better to trust the read<strong>in</strong>g and take appropriate precautions.Operators must be especially cautious when successive methane read<strong>in</strong>gs vary more than theynormally do. When the airflow is low or when measurements are taken close to the source, themethane will not be well mixed <strong>in</strong>to the air. This could lead to a high read<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> one area with alow read<strong>in</strong>g just a few feet away. This <strong>in</strong>complete mix<strong>in</strong>g can <strong>in</strong>dicate that the ventilation air isdeficient and that even higher concentrations of gas might be found nearby.REFERENCESCFR. Code of federal regulations. Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, DC: U.S. Government Pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g Office, Office ofthe Federal Register.CSA [1984]. Combustible gas detection <strong>in</strong>struments. Section 5.3.1, CSA standard C22.2No. 152–M1984 (product ID 2001201). Mississauga, Ontario: Canadian Standards Association.Firth JG, Jones A, Jones TA [1973]. The pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of the detection of flammable atmospheresby catalytic devices. Combust Flame 20:303–311.
35Industrial Scientific Corp. [2004]. Gas detection made easy. P/N 1600–0029. Oakdale, PA:Industrial Scientific Corp.Kim AG [1973]. The composition of coalbed gas. Pittsburgh, PA: U.S. Department of theInterior, Bureau of M<strong>in</strong>es, RI 7762. NTIS No. PB221574.Kissell FN, Banfield JL, Dalzell RW, Zabetakis MG [1974]. Peak methane concentrationsdur<strong>in</strong>g coal m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g: an analysis. Pittsburgh, PA: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau ofM<strong>in</strong>es, RI 7885. NTIS No. PB233424.Mills B [2003]. Fatal shaft explosion report <strong>in</strong>vestigation, McElroy Coal Co., McElroy m<strong>in</strong>e,Permit No. U–83–33, Central Cambria Drill<strong>in</strong>g Co., contractor No. C–618, January 22, 2003.Fairmont, WV: West Virg<strong>in</strong>ia Office of M<strong>in</strong>er’s Health, Safety and Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g.Ra<strong>in</strong>e EJ [1960]. Layer<strong>in</strong>g of firedamp <strong>in</strong> longwall work<strong>in</strong>g. Trans Inst M<strong>in</strong> Eng (U.K.)119(10):579–597.Taylor CD, Chilton JE, Mal T [2002]. Evaluat<strong>in</strong>g per<strong>for</strong>mance characteristics of mach<strong>in</strong>emountedmethane monitors by measur<strong>in</strong>g response time. In: De Souza E, ed. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of theNorth American/N<strong>in</strong>th U.S. M<strong>in</strong>e Ventilation Symposium (K<strong>in</strong>gston, Ontario, Canada). Lisse,Netherlands: Balkema, pp. 315–321.Taylor CD, Chilton JE, Zimmer JA [2004]. Use of a test box to measure response times <strong>for</strong>mach<strong>in</strong>e-mounted monitors. In: Ganguli R, Bandopadhyay S, eds. M<strong>in</strong>e ventilation: Proceed<strong>in</strong>gsof the 10th U.S./North American M<strong>in</strong>e Ventilation Symposium (Anchorage, AK, May 16–19, 2004). Leiden, Netherlands: Balkema, pp. 177–182.V<strong>in</strong>son RP, Thimons ED, Kissell FN [1978]. <strong>Methane</strong> accumulations <strong>in</strong> coal m<strong>in</strong>e roof cavities.Pittsburgh, PA: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of M<strong>in</strong>es, RI 8267. NTIS No.PB277919.Wallhagen RE [1977]. Development of optimized diffuser and spray fan systems <strong>for</strong> coal m<strong>in</strong>eface ventilation. Waltham, MA: Foster-Miller Associates, Inc. U.S. Bureau of M<strong>in</strong>es contractNo. H0230023. NTIS No. PB277987/AS.
- Page 1 and 2: TMIC 9486Information Circular/2006H
- Page 3 and 4: ORDERING INFORMATIONCopies of Natio
- Page 5 and 6: ILLUSTRATIONS—ContinuedPage4-6. U
- Page 8: HANDBOOK FOR METHANE CONTROL IN MIN
- Page 11 and 12: 4Below 5%, called the lower explosi
- Page 13 and 14: 6reduced pressure, except at very l
- Page 15 and 16: 8Static electricity. Protection aga
- Page 17 and 18: 10Figure 1-4.—Estimated methane c
- Page 19 and 20: 12LAYERING OF METHANE AT THE MINE R
- Page 21 and 22: 14good eyesight. 24methane level.Ot
- Page 23 and 24: 16a material balance indicated that
- Page 25 and 26: 18As an example, assume that themet
- Page 27 and 28: 20Figure 1-10.—Relative frequency
- Page 29 and 30: 22Davies AW, Isaac AK, Cook PM [200
- Page 31 and 32: 24Margerson SNA, Robinson H, Wilkin
- Page 33 and 34: CHAPTER 2.—SAMPLING FOR METHANE I
- Page 35 and 36: 29USING PORTABLE METHANE DETECTORST
- Page 37 and 38: Out-of-range gas concentrations in
- Page 39: Figure 2-3.—Recorder chart from a
- Page 43 and 44: 38peaks, not the overallmethane lev
- Page 45 and 46: 40hung on J-hook assemblies, which
- Page 47 and 48: 42Methane dilution effectiveness.Th
- Page 49 and 50: 44found that effective scrubber ope
- Page 51 and 52: 46When the scrubber exhaust is not
- Page 53 and 54: 48Methane monitors are usually moun
- Page 55 and 56: 50to use radial bits instead of con
- Page 57 and 58: 52Mott ML, Chuhta EJ [1991]. Face v
- Page 59 and 60: 54Service, Centers for Disease Cont
- Page 61 and 62: 56Methane accumulationsaround thesh
- Page 63 and 64: 58corner and by 43% at supportNo. 4
- Page 65 and 66: 60When using water sprays to reduce
- Page 67 and 68: 62Cecala AB, Zimmer JA, Thimons ED
- Page 69 and 70: 64DESIGNING BLEEDER SYSTEMSAs part
- Page 71 and 72: 66Caved area characteristics. The c
- Page 73 and 74: 68then move this gas into the activ
- Page 75 and 76: 70perform tests to determine whethe
- Page 77 and 78: 72A major purpose of the bleeder sy
- Page 79 and 80: 74• Inlets to the pillared area n
- Page 81 and 82: 76REFERENCESCFR. Code of federal re
- Page 83 and 84: 78Methane is released into each min
- Page 85 and 86: 80Figure 6-1.—Gas content of coal
- Page 87 and 88: 82Figure 6-3.—Simplified illustra
- Page 89 and 90: 842. In-mine inclined or vertical b
- Page 91 and 92:
861. Packed cavity method and its v
- Page 93 and 94:
88Table 6-3.—Methane capture rati
- Page 95 and 96:
90Early experiences with this metho
- Page 97 and 98:
9211. At the surface installation (
- Page 99 and 100:
94• Estimated cost for moderately
- Page 101 and 102:
96Thakur PC [1981]. Methane control
- Page 103 and 104:
98Anomalous, unanticipated methane
- Page 105 and 106:
100Vertical methane drainage boreho
- Page 107 and 108:
102Figure 7-2 shows a mine entry ap
- Page 109 and 110:
104obvious solution to this problem
- Page 111 and 112:
106Figure 7-8.—Hypothetical gas c
- Page 113 and 114:
108Lama and Bodziony [1998] compile
- Page 115 and 116:
110In-mine methane drainage systems
- Page 117 and 118:
112Iannacchione AT, Ulery JP, Hyman
- Page 119 and 120:
114More sophisticated reservoir eng
- Page 121 and 122:
116coal lithotype on gas content is
- Page 123 and 124:
118FORECASTING REMAINING GAS-IN-PLA
- Page 125 and 126:
120⎛ y⎞⎜⎛⎞ ⎛ ⎞= ⎜
- Page 127 and 128:
122emissions. The geometry and size
- Page 129 and 130:
124Reservoir models require a subst
- Page 131 and 132:
126King GR, Ertekin T [1989a]. A su
- Page 133 and 134:
128an area of 314 ft 2 would requir
- Page 135 and 136:
130In the case of the abovementione
- Page 137 and 138:
132FILLING SHAFTS AT CLOSED MINESFi
- Page 139 and 140:
134Hinderfeld G [1995]. Ventilation
- Page 141 and 142:
136To calculate the effectiveinert,
- Page 143 and 144:
138exhaust. The remaining diesel ex
- Page 145 and 146:
140required only 4 min. As a result
- Page 147 and 148:
142Figure 11-1.—Desorption test a
- Page 149 and 150:
144enclosed in a tunnel-like struct
- Page 151 and 152:
146Kolada RJ [1985]. Investigation
- Page 153 and 154:
148air in a 6-ft by 9-ft by 6.5-ft
- Page 155 and 156:
150represents flammable mixtures. F
- Page 157 and 158:
152• In Eastern Europe, petroleum
- Page 159 and 160:
154Category II applies to domal sal
- Page 161 and 162:
1562. Monitoring for gas and taking
- Page 163 and 164:
158These mines typically have large
- Page 165 and 166:
160Dave Graham is the safety and he
- Page 167 and 168:
162Figure 13-2.—Examples of metha
- Page 169 and 170:
164REFERENCESAndrews JN [1987]. Nob
- Page 171 and 172:
166APPENDIX A.—ONTARIO OCCUPATION
- Page 174 and 175:
169CHAPTER 14.—PREVENTING METHANE
- Page 176 and 177:
Ways to confirm the presence of gas
- Page 178 and 179:
173The tunnel face is usually venti
- Page 180 and 181:
175Figure 14-5.—TBM ventilation s
- Page 182 and 183:
face. While one of these elements a
- Page 184 and 185:
179ELIMINATING IGNITION SOURCESElec
- Page 186 and 187:
181INDEXAAbnormally gassy faces....
- Page 188 and 189:
183NNatural ventilation, coal silos
- Page 190 and 191:
Delivering on the Nation’s Promis