13.07.2015 Views

Handbook for Methane Control in Mining - AMMSA

Handbook for Methane Control in Mining - AMMSA

Handbook for Methane Control in Mining - AMMSA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

20Figure 1–10.—Relative frequency of occurrence of majorand m<strong>in</strong>or gas and dust explosions.• All major explosions (where five ormore m<strong>in</strong>ers were killed). Most majorexplosions <strong>in</strong>volved both gas and dust.• Major dust explosions. Dust explosionsare those where the accident<strong>in</strong>vestigators concluded that dust wasdirectly ignited, without gas participat<strong>in</strong>gas an <strong>in</strong>termediate stage.Typically, these took place <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>esknown to be relatively free ofmethane and where the dust wasignited by a blown-out shot.• M<strong>in</strong>or dust explosions (fewer thanfive m<strong>in</strong>ers killed).• M<strong>in</strong>or gas explosions. Accident<strong>in</strong>vestigators concluded that dust wasnot <strong>in</strong>volved.• Explosions <strong>in</strong> anthracite m<strong>in</strong>es. Thesewere known to be “gas only” becauseanthracite dust is not explosive underthe conditions prevail<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g.Figure 1–10 shows the relative frequencyof each of these types ofexplosions <strong>for</strong> the period 1911 to 1970.When all major explosions are considered, the higher frequency <strong>in</strong> w<strong>in</strong>ter months is clearly evident.However, this trend is far more pronounced <strong>for</strong> the dust explosions. No trend favor<strong>in</strong>g thew<strong>in</strong>ter months is evident <strong>in</strong> the anthracite m<strong>in</strong>e explosions or those categorized as “gas only.”This provides strong evidence that it is dust, not gas, that accounts <strong>for</strong> the seasonal trend <strong>in</strong>U.S. coal m<strong>in</strong>e explosions. 34REFERENCESBakke P, Leach SJ [1962]. Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of <strong>for</strong>mation and dispersion of methane roof layers andsome remedial measures. M<strong>in</strong> Eng (U.K.) Jul:645–669.Bakke P, Leach SJ [1965]. Turbulent diffusion of a buoyant layer at a wall. Appl Sci Res15(sect A):97–135.Bakke P, Leach SJ, Slack A [1964]. Some theoretical and experimental observations on therecirculation of m<strong>in</strong>e ventilation. Colliery Eng 41(Nov):471–477.34 The results of Kissell et al. do not contradict the conclusions by Fauconnier. The seasonal trend <strong>for</strong> coal m<strong>in</strong>eexplosions <strong>in</strong> the United States might be due to colder w<strong>in</strong>ter months or the fact that a different timeframe wasexam<strong>in</strong>ed. Also, Fauconnier comb<strong>in</strong>ed explosions at both coal and gold m<strong>in</strong>es.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!