migration and present hazards similar to clastic dikes when m<strong>in</strong>ed through. Predict<strong>in</strong>g the locationand orientation of igneous dikes <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g sections is best accomplished by detailedunderground mapp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> adjacent developed sections. Remediat<strong>in</strong>g potential gas emission hazardsassociated with igneous dikes, as with clastic dikes, is best accomplished by horizontal boreholesdrilled from the face to penetrate the dike.Concordant igneous features such as sills usually cover a far greater area than dikes and can elevatethe thermal maturity and gas content of a coalbed over a similarly large area [Gurba andWeber 2001]. However, the greater extent of these features is more conducive to prediction andmapp<strong>in</strong>g through conventional exploratory core drill<strong>in</strong>g programs. If associated gas contents andemissions are expected to present a potential hazard, prem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g methane dra<strong>in</strong>age throughvertical methane dra<strong>in</strong>age boreholes drilled from the surface is the optimal method to alleviatethe hazard.107GAS OUTBURSTS AND BLOWERSAlthough not generally considered to be hazards <strong>in</strong> domestic m<strong>in</strong>es at present, both outbursts andblowers historically have occurred <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> U.S. m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g districts [Darton 1915; Campoli et al.1985]. The two features are ma<strong>in</strong>ly dist<strong>in</strong>guished by their duration of occurrence. Outbursts aresudden, often violent expulsions of large quantities of gas, usually methane, and are generallyassociated with the ejection of great quantities of coal or other rock material. Blowers, on theother hand, historically have been viewed as the release of large quantities of gas, but over anextended time period of months or even years. Also, blowers are not associated with the expulsionof coal or rock material. A subset of blowers is methane bleeders, which also cont<strong>in</strong>uallyemit gas, but at lower rates and generally <strong>for</strong> shorter timeframes.Although not typically associated with U.S. coal m<strong>in</strong>es, gas outbursts occur regularly <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong>m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g districts worldwide. Typically, the m<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> these districts are <strong>in</strong> a coalbed with high <strong>in</strong>placegas contents, coupled with steeply dipp<strong>in</strong>g and/or very deep work<strong>in</strong>gs. As shallower, moreeasily extracted coal reserves are depleted <strong>in</strong> the United States and as m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g progresses todeeper, more structurally complex and gassier coalbeds, the potential <strong>for</strong> gas outbursts will likely<strong>in</strong>crease. Campoli et al. [1985] del<strong>in</strong>eate more than a dozen U.S. coalbeds with outburst potentialbased on <strong>in</strong>ternationally recognized criteria. In fact, gas outbursts have been documentedthroughout history <strong>in</strong> U.S. m<strong>in</strong>es with similar conditions.Historical examples of U.S. outbursts are mentioned by Darton [1915] as occurr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Pennsylvania.Two of these occurred <strong>in</strong> anthracite m<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> steeply dipp<strong>in</strong>g coalbeds. Another tookplace <strong>in</strong> western Pennsylvania near Connellsville, where Darton noted that 100,000 ft 3 of freshair per m<strong>in</strong>ute <strong>for</strong> 3 days was required to reduce the methane concentration <strong>in</strong> the m<strong>in</strong>e air to safelevels. Little additional documentation is presented, and it is not known if rock material was alsoejected with the gas. Darton also summarized extensive European documentation of gas outburstsand concluded that these phenomena were usually related to crushed coal zones associatedwith folds, buckles, and faults.
108Lama and Bodziony [1998] compiled a comprehensive overview of outbursts worldwide andtheir causative factors and prevention. They conclude that the follow<strong>in</strong>g factors contribute tooutbursts: (1) gas content, (2) gas pressure, (3) permeability, (4) sorption/desorption characteristics,(5) stress conditions, (6) coal strength, and (7) geologic factors (often related to tectonicactivity). Other modern research on these phenomena has demonstrated two major <strong>in</strong>dicators ofoutburst potential <strong>in</strong> coal m<strong>in</strong>es. The first <strong>in</strong>dicator is the coal lithotype. Beamish and Crosdale[1998] demonstrated that coals with high vitra<strong>in</strong> and/or <strong>in</strong>ertodetr<strong>in</strong>ite lithotypes were morelikely to reta<strong>in</strong> the large quantities of gas needed to produce outbursts. A second <strong>in</strong>dicator, documentedby Cao et al. [2001], is the association of outbursts with tectonically altered, faultedcoals. Cao et al. noted that outbursts <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a seem to be associated with tectonic activity thathas produced regional thrust and reverse fault<strong>in</strong>g. Such fault<strong>in</strong>g often manifests itself <strong>in</strong> coalbedsbecause of their brittle nature compared to the surround<strong>in</strong>g strata. The coal adjacent to suchfaults is often severely crushed and pulverized, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> significant local changes <strong>in</strong> the gasstorage and migration characteristics of the coal.Blowers, like outbursts, are not normally associated with coal m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the United States, buthistorically they have been noted <strong>in</strong> the United States and <strong>in</strong> other m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g districts abroad.Darton [1915] summarized documented blower occurrences worldwide and noted the occurrenceof blowerlike features <strong>in</strong> the Pennsylvania anthracite district.Detection and remediation of outbursts and blowers. Based on past observations, outburstsand blowers are often associated with tectonically disturbed and faulted strata where gassy coalsare m<strong>in</strong>ed at considerable depth. Thus, m<strong>in</strong>e planners who are aware of such conditions shouldgive some thought to the possibility that they will be extract<strong>in</strong>g coal under conditions that haveproduced outbursts and blowers <strong>in</strong> other m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g districts.If large-scale fault<strong>in</strong>g is known and adequately mapped <strong>in</strong> future development areas, a detailedcore-drill<strong>in</strong>g program, coupled with gas content test<strong>in</strong>g of core samples and <strong>in</strong> situ gas pressuremeasurements, can detect potential outburst-prone areas. Beamish and Crosdale [1998] recommend,as do Lama and Bodziony [1998], the use of any one of several published gas emission<strong>in</strong>dices as an <strong>in</strong>dicator of proneness to outburst<strong>in</strong>g.S<strong>in</strong>ce outbursts often occur <strong>in</strong> “nests” or clusters, when such conditions are encountered oranticipated, remediation may be achieved by us<strong>in</strong>g gas dra<strong>in</strong>age techniques such as verticalmethane dra<strong>in</strong>age boreholes drilled from the surface, horizontal boreholes drilled undergroundahead of the face, or (if outburst-prone strata are <strong>in</strong> the roof rock) cross-measure boreholes[Diamond 1994]. Typically, these boreholes will penetrate the fault system that has altered thecoal structure and allowed large quantities of gas to accumulate at great pressure beh<strong>in</strong>d it. Theboreholes are used to dra<strong>in</strong> gas from the outburst-prone area and to relieve the gas overpressurethat drives outbursts. Lama and Bodziony [1998] stress that vertical surface boreholes may bepreferred over holes drilled <strong>in</strong> the coalbed because of the difficulty of ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g borehole<strong>in</strong>tegrity dur<strong>in</strong>g horizontal drill<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the outburst-prone strata. The difficulty of ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gborehole <strong>in</strong>tegrity is due to the crushed nature of the coal <strong>in</strong> these areas. Beamish and Crosdale[1998] also recommend water <strong>in</strong>fusion to reduce outburst hazards.
- Page 1 and 2:
TMIC 9486Information Circular/2006H
- Page 3 and 4:
ORDERING INFORMATIONCopies of Natio
- Page 5 and 6:
ILLUSTRATIONS—ContinuedPage4-6. U
- Page 8:
HANDBOOK FOR METHANE CONTROL IN MIN
- Page 11 and 12:
4Below 5%, called the lower explosi
- Page 13 and 14:
6reduced pressure, except at very l
- Page 15 and 16:
8Static electricity. Protection aga
- Page 17 and 18:
10Figure 1-4.—Estimated methane c
- Page 19 and 20:
12LAYERING OF METHANE AT THE MINE R
- Page 21 and 22:
14good eyesight. 24methane level.Ot
- Page 23 and 24:
16a material balance indicated that
- Page 25 and 26:
18As an example, assume that themet
- Page 27 and 28:
20Figure 1-10.—Relative frequency
- Page 29 and 30:
22Davies AW, Isaac AK, Cook PM [200
- Page 31 and 32:
24Margerson SNA, Robinson H, Wilkin
- Page 33 and 34:
CHAPTER 2.—SAMPLING FOR METHANE I
- Page 35 and 36:
29USING PORTABLE METHANE DETECTORST
- Page 37 and 38:
Out-of-range gas concentrations in
- Page 39 and 40:
Figure 2-3.—Recorder chart from a
- Page 41 and 42:
35Industrial Scientific Corp. [2004
- Page 43 and 44:
38peaks, not the overallmethane lev
- Page 45 and 46:
40hung on J-hook assemblies, which
- Page 47 and 48:
42Methane dilution effectiveness.Th
- Page 49 and 50:
44found that effective scrubber ope
- Page 51 and 52:
46When the scrubber exhaust is not
- Page 53 and 54:
48Methane monitors are usually moun
- Page 55 and 56:
50to use radial bits instead of con
- Page 57 and 58:
52Mott ML, Chuhta EJ [1991]. Face v
- Page 59 and 60:
54Service, Centers for Disease Cont
- Page 61 and 62: 56Methane accumulationsaround thesh
- Page 63 and 64: 58corner and by 43% at supportNo. 4
- Page 65 and 66: 60When using water sprays to reduce
- Page 67 and 68: 62Cecala AB, Zimmer JA, Thimons ED
- Page 69 and 70: 64DESIGNING BLEEDER SYSTEMSAs part
- Page 71 and 72: 66Caved area characteristics. The c
- Page 73 and 74: 68then move this gas into the activ
- Page 75 and 76: 70perform tests to determine whethe
- Page 77 and 78: 72A major purpose of the bleeder sy
- Page 79 and 80: 74• Inlets to the pillared area n
- Page 81 and 82: 76REFERENCESCFR. Code of federal re
- Page 83 and 84: 78Methane is released into each min
- Page 85 and 86: 80Figure 6-1.—Gas content of coal
- Page 87 and 88: 82Figure 6-3.—Simplified illustra
- Page 89 and 90: 842. In-mine inclined or vertical b
- Page 91 and 92: 861. Packed cavity method and its v
- Page 93 and 94: 88Table 6-3.—Methane capture rati
- Page 95 and 96: 90Early experiences with this metho
- Page 97 and 98: 9211. At the surface installation (
- Page 99 and 100: 94• Estimated cost for moderately
- Page 101 and 102: 96Thakur PC [1981]. Methane control
- Page 103 and 104: 98Anomalous, unanticipated methane
- Page 105 and 106: 100Vertical methane drainage boreho
- Page 107 and 108: 102Figure 7-2 shows a mine entry ap
- Page 109 and 110: 104obvious solution to this problem
- Page 111: 106Figure 7-8.—Hypothetical gas c
- Page 115 and 116: 110In-mine methane drainage systems
- Page 117 and 118: 112Iannacchione AT, Ulery JP, Hyman
- Page 119 and 120: 114More sophisticated reservoir eng
- Page 121 and 122: 116coal lithotype on gas content is
- Page 123 and 124: 118FORECASTING REMAINING GAS-IN-PLA
- Page 125 and 126: 120⎛ y⎞⎜⎛⎞ ⎛ ⎞= ⎜
- Page 127 and 128: 122emissions. The geometry and size
- Page 129 and 130: 124Reservoir models require a subst
- Page 131 and 132: 126King GR, Ertekin T [1989a]. A su
- Page 133 and 134: 128an area of 314 ft 2 would requir
- Page 135 and 136: 130In the case of the abovementione
- Page 137 and 138: 132FILLING SHAFTS AT CLOSED MINESFi
- Page 139 and 140: 134Hinderfeld G [1995]. Ventilation
- Page 141 and 142: 136To calculate the effectiveinert,
- Page 143 and 144: 138exhaust. The remaining diesel ex
- Page 145 and 146: 140required only 4 min. As a result
- Page 147 and 148: 142Figure 11-1.—Desorption test a
- Page 149 and 150: 144enclosed in a tunnel-like struct
- Page 151 and 152: 146Kolada RJ [1985]. Investigation
- Page 153 and 154: 148air in a 6-ft by 9-ft by 6.5-ft
- Page 155 and 156: 150represents flammable mixtures. F
- Page 157 and 158: 152• In Eastern Europe, petroleum
- Page 159 and 160: 154Category II applies to domal sal
- Page 161 and 162: 1562. Monitoring for gas and taking
- Page 163 and 164:
158These mines typically have large
- Page 165 and 166:
160Dave Graham is the safety and he
- Page 167 and 168:
162Figure 13-2.—Examples of metha
- Page 169 and 170:
164REFERENCESAndrews JN [1987]. Nob
- Page 171 and 172:
166APPENDIX A.—ONTARIO OCCUPATION
- Page 174 and 175:
169CHAPTER 14.—PREVENTING METHANE
- Page 176 and 177:
Ways to confirm the presence of gas
- Page 178 and 179:
173The tunnel face is usually venti
- Page 180 and 181:
175Figure 14-5.—TBM ventilation s
- Page 182 and 183:
face. While one of these elements a
- Page 184 and 185:
179ELIMINATING IGNITION SOURCESElec
- Page 186 and 187:
181INDEXAAbnormally gassy faces....
- Page 188 and 189:
183NNatural ventilation, coal silos
- Page 190 and 191:
Delivering on the Nation’s Promis