13.07.2015 Views

Handbook for Methane Control in Mining - AMMSA

Handbook for Methane Control in Mining - AMMSA

Handbook for Methane Control in Mining - AMMSA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

147CHAPTER 12.—EXPLOSION HAZARDS OF COAL DUSTIN THE PRESENCE OF METHANEBy Kenneth L. Cashdollar 1 and Michael J. Sapko 2In This Chapter <strong>Methane</strong> ignition as <strong>in</strong>itiation source <strong>for</strong> much larger secondary coal dust explosions Rock dust<strong>in</strong>g requirements to prevent coal dust explosions Dangers of hybrid mixtures of methane and coal dustAlthough methane explosions are dangerous, those that <strong>in</strong>volve coal dust are even more so.If explod<strong>in</strong>g methane disperses and ignites the coal dust that has accumulated on the m<strong>in</strong>e ribsand floor, the burn<strong>in</strong>g coal dust immeasurably <strong>in</strong>creases the strength of the explosion. Suchmethane-dust explosions are prevented by <strong>in</strong>ert<strong>in</strong>g the coal dust <strong>in</strong> a way that prevents theexplod<strong>in</strong>g methane from ignit<strong>in</strong>g it. This chapter discusses the dust hazard and how it is prevented<strong>in</strong> U.S. coal m<strong>in</strong>es.METHANE IGNITION AS INITIATION SOURCE FOR MUCH LARGERSECONDARY COAL DUST EXPLOSIONSThe typical scenario <strong>for</strong> coal m<strong>in</strong>e explosions starts with the ignition of a flammable methane-airatmosphere near the face. The turbulent w<strong>in</strong>ds from the primary methane explosion then dispersethe coal dust. If there is <strong>in</strong>sufficient rock dust (usually limestone), a secondary coal dustexplosion then propagates throughout large sections of the m<strong>in</strong>e. These scenarios have beenstudied extensively at the Bruceton Experimental M<strong>in</strong>e (BEM) and the Lake Lynn ExperimentalM<strong>in</strong>e (LLEM) of the NIOSH Pittsburgh Research Laboratory.The m<strong>in</strong>imum quantity of methane required to <strong>in</strong>itiate a coal dust explosion was studied <strong>in</strong> 1930<strong>in</strong> the BEM [Rice et al. 1933; Nagy 1981] and then later <strong>in</strong> the LLEM, whose cross-sectionalarea (130 ft 2 ) is over twice that of the BEM [Sapko et al. 1987a]. Studies conducted <strong>in</strong> the BEMclosely simulated conditions that existed <strong>in</strong> operat<strong>in</strong>g m<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> the early 20th century. The latertests <strong>in</strong> the 20-ft-wide entries of the LLEM simulated the geometries of modern m<strong>in</strong>es withadvanced roof support technology.The data from the BEM tests show that 13 ft 3 was the m<strong>in</strong>imum quantity of methane at the facethat, when ignited, would disperse and ignite coal dust. In the BEM, this amount of methane wasmixed with air to <strong>for</strong>m a total flammable volume of about 140 ft 3 of a 9% methane-<strong>in</strong>-air mixture.In the wider entries of the LLEM, about 37 ft 3 of methane was required to disperse purecoal dust and start a self-susta<strong>in</strong>ed coal dust explosion. This amount of methane was mixed with1 Research physicist.2 Research physical scientist.Pittsburgh Research Laboratory, National Institute <strong>for</strong> Occupational Safety and Health, Pittsburgh, PA.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!