Handbook for Methane Control in Mining - AMMSA
Handbook for Methane Control in Mining - AMMSA
Handbook for Methane Control in Mining - AMMSA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
138exhaust. The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g diesel exhaust was vented at the roof of the auger drill. The comb<strong>in</strong>edexhaust flows were routed through a section of 5-<strong>in</strong>-diam flexible pipe that connected to a verticaldescend<strong>in</strong>g pipe that brought the exhaust to the level of the hole. A 7-ft length of 3-<strong>in</strong> stubpipe extended the exhaust gas discharge about 5 ft <strong>in</strong>to the hole.With this system, <strong>in</strong>ert gas mixture was released at the collar of the hole, reach<strong>in</strong>g the cutt<strong>in</strong>ghead by simple displacement of the extracted coal. The <strong>in</strong>ert gas followed the auger head <strong>in</strong>tothe hole. As anger<strong>in</strong>g proceeded, the hole rema<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>ert condition provided that a sufficientvolume of <strong>in</strong>ert gas always flowed out of the hole to keep out the surround<strong>in</strong>g air.Ripper-head m<strong>in</strong>ers. Adapt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ert gas technology from auger m<strong>in</strong>ers to ripper-head m<strong>in</strong>ers<strong>in</strong>volves few changes. Ripper-head systems are <strong>in</strong> use <strong>in</strong> Australia with the addition of an automatedstub pipe that discharges the <strong>in</strong>ert gas farther <strong>in</strong>to the hole. The <strong>in</strong>ert gas has to bedischarged farther <strong>in</strong>to the hole because the hole is wider. With a short stub pipe, the wideropen<strong>in</strong>gs may allow equipment movement and external w<strong>in</strong>d to dilute the <strong>in</strong>ert gas be<strong>for</strong>e it candisplace the removed coal.An <strong>in</strong>ert gas system designed and used by a m<strong>in</strong>e operatordoes not have to be identical to the one designed byVolkwe<strong>in</strong> and Ulery. However, any <strong>in</strong>ert gas generationsystem must deliver an adequate quantity of gas with asufficiently low oxygen concentration.SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS AND OPERATIONInert gas quantity. In order <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong>ert conditions to be ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed at the cutt<strong>in</strong>g head of theauger str<strong>in</strong>g, the volume of <strong>in</strong>ert gas produced must exceed the volume of coal removed and the<strong>in</strong>ert gas must be supplied cont<strong>in</strong>uously as auger<strong>in</strong>g proceeds. This keeps the surround<strong>in</strong>g air outof the hole.Dur<strong>in</strong>g test<strong>in</strong>g of the system designed by Volkwe<strong>in</strong> and Ulery [1993], time studies of coalremoval showed that auger sections 17 through 27 required an average of 102 sec per cycle.Of that cycle time, approximately 20 sec was required <strong>for</strong> retraction of the kelly bar, leav<strong>in</strong>g82 sec <strong>for</strong> coal removal. The fastest cycle time recorded was 70 sec <strong>for</strong> coal removal. Eachadded auger section removed a coal cyl<strong>in</strong>der 3.25 ft <strong>in</strong> diameter by 6 ft long, or 49.7 ft 3 of coal.The average coal removal rate was calculated to be 35.0 ft 3 /m<strong>in</strong>, with a maximum removal rateof 42.0 ft 3 /m<strong>in</strong>. At greater hole depth (auger numbers 55 through 60), the average removal ratewas calculated to be 27.0 ft 3 /m<strong>in</strong>, with a maximum rate of 30.3 ft 3 /m<strong>in</strong>. Smaller diameter augersor slower penetration speeds will decrease this volume, and vice versa.S<strong>in</strong>ce the eng<strong>in</strong>e gas cools and water vapor condenses <strong>in</strong>side the auger hole, the amount of <strong>in</strong>ertgas actually available is the cooled gas, not the hot gas. When the volume of hot gas is measured,a large correction factor must be used to determ<strong>in</strong>e the available <strong>in</strong>ert gas volume.A correction factor of 0.125 was obta<strong>in</strong>ed dur<strong>in</strong>g the test<strong>in</strong>g, so 0.125 was multiplied by the hot