13.07.2015 Views

Handbook for Methane Control in Mining - AMMSA

Handbook for Methane Control in Mining - AMMSA

Handbook for Methane Control in Mining - AMMSA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

138exhaust. The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g diesel exhaust was vented at the roof of the auger drill. The comb<strong>in</strong>edexhaust flows were routed through a section of 5-<strong>in</strong>-diam flexible pipe that connected to a verticaldescend<strong>in</strong>g pipe that brought the exhaust to the level of the hole. A 7-ft length of 3-<strong>in</strong> stubpipe extended the exhaust gas discharge about 5 ft <strong>in</strong>to the hole.With this system, <strong>in</strong>ert gas mixture was released at the collar of the hole, reach<strong>in</strong>g the cutt<strong>in</strong>ghead by simple displacement of the extracted coal. The <strong>in</strong>ert gas followed the auger head <strong>in</strong>tothe hole. As anger<strong>in</strong>g proceeded, the hole rema<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>ert condition provided that a sufficientvolume of <strong>in</strong>ert gas always flowed out of the hole to keep out the surround<strong>in</strong>g air.Ripper-head m<strong>in</strong>ers. Adapt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ert gas technology from auger m<strong>in</strong>ers to ripper-head m<strong>in</strong>ers<strong>in</strong>volves few changes. Ripper-head systems are <strong>in</strong> use <strong>in</strong> Australia with the addition of an automatedstub pipe that discharges the <strong>in</strong>ert gas farther <strong>in</strong>to the hole. The <strong>in</strong>ert gas has to bedischarged farther <strong>in</strong>to the hole because the hole is wider. With a short stub pipe, the wideropen<strong>in</strong>gs may allow equipment movement and external w<strong>in</strong>d to dilute the <strong>in</strong>ert gas be<strong>for</strong>e it candisplace the removed coal.An <strong>in</strong>ert gas system designed and used by a m<strong>in</strong>e operatordoes not have to be identical to the one designed byVolkwe<strong>in</strong> and Ulery. However, any <strong>in</strong>ert gas generationsystem must deliver an adequate quantity of gas with asufficiently low oxygen concentration.SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS AND OPERATIONInert gas quantity. In order <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong>ert conditions to be ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed at the cutt<strong>in</strong>g head of theauger str<strong>in</strong>g, the volume of <strong>in</strong>ert gas produced must exceed the volume of coal removed and the<strong>in</strong>ert gas must be supplied cont<strong>in</strong>uously as auger<strong>in</strong>g proceeds. This keeps the surround<strong>in</strong>g air outof the hole.Dur<strong>in</strong>g test<strong>in</strong>g of the system designed by Volkwe<strong>in</strong> and Ulery [1993], time studies of coalremoval showed that auger sections 17 through 27 required an average of 102 sec per cycle.Of that cycle time, approximately 20 sec was required <strong>for</strong> retraction of the kelly bar, leav<strong>in</strong>g82 sec <strong>for</strong> coal removal. The fastest cycle time recorded was 70 sec <strong>for</strong> coal removal. Eachadded auger section removed a coal cyl<strong>in</strong>der 3.25 ft <strong>in</strong> diameter by 6 ft long, or 49.7 ft 3 of coal.The average coal removal rate was calculated to be 35.0 ft 3 /m<strong>in</strong>, with a maximum removal rateof 42.0 ft 3 /m<strong>in</strong>. At greater hole depth (auger numbers 55 through 60), the average removal ratewas calculated to be 27.0 ft 3 /m<strong>in</strong>, with a maximum rate of 30.3 ft 3 /m<strong>in</strong>. Smaller diameter augersor slower penetration speeds will decrease this volume, and vice versa.S<strong>in</strong>ce the eng<strong>in</strong>e gas cools and water vapor condenses <strong>in</strong>side the auger hole, the amount of <strong>in</strong>ertgas actually available is the cooled gas, not the hot gas. When the volume of hot gas is measured,a large correction factor must be used to determ<strong>in</strong>e the available <strong>in</strong>ert gas volume.A correction factor of 0.125 was obta<strong>in</strong>ed dur<strong>in</strong>g the test<strong>in</strong>g, so 0.125 was multiplied by the hot

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!