08.03.2016 Views

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

V<br />

WOMEN’S ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOR GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE 99<br />

dynamic, participa<strong>to</strong>ry, open <strong>to</strong> innovative practical measures,<br />

gender-sensitive, and take account of the increasing demands<br />

for <strong>justice</strong> by women”. 246 Legal systems need <strong>to</strong> reform and<br />

develop <strong>to</strong> achieve this good quality of <strong>justice</strong>. The Committee<br />

has therefore called on States <strong>to</strong>: “Conduct and facilitate<br />

qualitative studies and critical gender analysis in collaboration<br />

with civil society organizations as well as academic institutions<br />

of all <strong>justice</strong> systems in order <strong>to</strong> highlight practices, procedures<br />

and jurisprudence that promote or limit women’s full access <strong>to</strong><br />

<strong>justice</strong>; and [s]ystematically apply the findings of this analysis<br />

in order <strong>to</strong> develop priorities, policies, legislation and<br />

procedures <strong>to</strong> ensure that all components of the <strong>justice</strong> system<br />

are gender sensitive, user friendly and accountable”. 247<br />

As discussed above, especially under Chapter IV, all persons<br />

have a right <strong>to</strong> an effective remedy and reparation for human<br />

rights violations under general international law, including in<br />

the context of discrimination against women and gender-based<br />

violence against women. The CEDAW Committee has made it<br />

clear that States have an obligation under the CEDAW<br />

Convention <strong>to</strong> provide access <strong>to</strong> a legal remedy for<br />

discrimination, even if the CEDAW Convention does not<br />

expressly provide for a right <strong>to</strong> a remedy. 248 Other United<br />

Nations treaty bodies responsible for the oversight of other<br />

universal human rights treaties without express remedial<br />

provisions have come <strong>to</strong> a similar conclusion. 249 The CEDAW<br />

Committee considers that such a right is implied in the<br />

Convention, in particular by Article 2(c) which requires States<br />

246<br />

CEDAW General Recommendation No 33, above note 232,<br />

paragraph 14(d).<br />

247<br />

Ibid, paragraph 20(e) and (f).<br />

248<br />

Vertido v Philippines, CEDAW Communication 18/2008, UN Doc<br />

CEDAW/C/46/D/18/2008 (2010), paragraph 8.3.<br />

249<br />

See, for example: Committee on the Rights of the Child, General<br />

Comment No 12, “The right of the child <strong>to</strong> be heard”, UN Doc<br />

CRC/C/GC/12 (2009), paragraph 48; and Committee on Economic,<br />

Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment No 9, “The domestic<br />

application of the Covenant”, UN Doc E/C.12/1998/24 (1998),<br />

paragraphs 2 and 3.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!