08.03.2016 Views

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

V<br />

WOMEN’S ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOR GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE 199<br />

“[Any] rigid approach <strong>to</strong> the prosecution of sexual<br />

offences, such as requiring proof of physical resistance<br />

in all circumstances, risks leaving certain types of rape<br />

unpunished and thus jeopardising the effective<br />

protection of the individual's sexual au<strong>to</strong>nomy. In<br />

accordance with contemporary standards and trends in<br />

that area, the member States' positive obligations under<br />

Articles 3 and 8 of the Convention must be seen as<br />

requiring the penalisation and effective prosecution of<br />

any non-consensual sexual act, including in the absence<br />

of physical resistance by the victim.” 528<br />

Committing rape through coercion and threat<br />

Sexual acts performed via coercion and the threat of violence,<br />

without the actual use of physical violence, can amount <strong>to</strong> the<br />

crime of rape. In this regard, ensuring <strong>justice</strong> for women who<br />

have been subjected <strong>to</strong> rape in situations of armed conflict led<br />

<strong>to</strong> a profound practical examination of the conditions under<br />

which rape is perpetrated. Following the widespread use of<br />

rape and sexual violence against women in armed conflict in<br />

Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia in the 1990s, a number of<br />

women’s rights advocates worked <strong>to</strong> ensure that rape could be<br />

prosecuted in the ad hoc international criminal tribunals as war<br />

crimes and crimes against humanity, in procedures that were<br />

fair <strong>to</strong> women who were victims and witnesses, avoiding the<br />

stereotyping and secondary victimization in criminal trials at<br />

the domestic level. Developments in gender-competent<br />

procedures and jurisprudence in the ad hoc criminal tribunals<br />

for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda were affirmed and<br />

developed further in the negotiation of the Rome Statute of the<br />

International Criminal Court, its Elements of Crimes and its<br />

Rules of Procedure and Evidence.<br />

Because of the constant threat of violence in situations of<br />

armed conflict, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda<br />

(ICTR) in the Akayesu case defined rape as “a physical invasion<br />

of a sexual nature, committed on a person under circumstances<br />

528<br />

M.C. v Bulgaria (2003) ECHR 651, paragraphs 164-166.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!