08.03.2016 Views

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

V<br />

WOMEN’S ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOR GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE 141<br />

typically religious or cus<strong>to</strong>m-based personal status law does<br />

not apply equality. 368<br />

The safety and well-being of women and their children must be<br />

prioritized in situations where negotiation and alternative<br />

dispute resolution are being used <strong>to</strong> address civil and family<br />

law issues. Where a perpetra<strong>to</strong>r continues <strong>to</strong> threaten the<br />

safety and well-being of women and their children, the safety<br />

of those women and their children must be prioritized. 369<br />

In the case of Angela González Carreño v Spain, where a child<br />

was murdered by her estranged father after a long his<strong>to</strong>ry of<br />

domestic violence, the CEDAW Committee outlined the human<br />

rights principles that family laws should include:<br />

The best interest of the child is the central concern; 370<br />

The child’s right <strong>to</strong> be heard must prevail; 371<br />

368<br />

CEDAW Committee, General Recommendation No 29, “Economic<br />

consequences of marriage, family relations and their dissolution”, UN<br />

Doc CEDAW/C/GC/29 (2013). See: paragraph 14, which states “The<br />

Committee has consistently expressed concern that identity-based<br />

personal status laws and cus<strong>to</strong>ms perpetuate discrimination against<br />

women and that the preservation of multiple legal systems is in itself<br />

discrimina<strong>to</strong>ry against women. Lack of individual choice relating <strong>to</strong> the<br />

application or observance of particular laws and cus<strong>to</strong>ms exacerbates<br />

this discrimination.”; and paragraph 15, which states “States parties<br />

should adopt written family codes or personal status laws that provide<br />

for equality between spouses or partners irrespective of their religious<br />

or ethnic identity or community, in accordance with the Convention<br />

and the Committee’s general recommendations. In the absence of a<br />

unified family law, the system of personal status laws should provide<br />

for individual choice as <strong>to</strong> the application of religious law, ethnic<br />

cus<strong>to</strong>m or civil law at any stage of the relationship. Personal laws<br />

should embody the fundamental principle of equality between women<br />

and men, and should be fully harmonized with the provisions of the<br />

Convention so as <strong>to</strong> eliminate all discrimination against women in all<br />

matters relating <strong>to</strong> marriage and family relations.”<br />

369<br />

Carreño v Spain, above note 353.<br />

370<br />

Ibid, paragraph 11(b)(i).<br />

371<br />

Ibid, paragraph 11(b)(i).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!