08.03.2016 Views

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

V<br />

WOMEN’S ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOR GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE 315<br />

The European Court of Human Rights has found violations of<br />

this obligation when a prison administration refused <strong>to</strong> post the<br />

applicant’s letter <strong>to</strong> the Court itself or interfered with it, 809 or<br />

when the applicant was directly asked by the national<br />

authorities about the petition, 810 or when the applicant was<br />

pressured or intimidated by the national authorities not <strong>to</strong> file<br />

or <strong>to</strong> withdraw the application. 811<br />

The Committee against Torture determined that a State had<br />

violated the applicant’s right <strong>to</strong> petition where it did not grant a<br />

reasonable period of time before the execution of the final<br />

decision <strong>to</strong> remove him from the national terri<strong>to</strong>ry, so as <strong>to</strong> not<br />

allow him <strong>to</strong> consider whether <strong>to</strong> petition the Committee<br />

itself. 812<br />

5. Third party interventions<br />

The universal treaty bodies – HRC, CESCR, CAT, CERD and<br />

CEDAW – do not provide expressly for the presentation of<br />

formal third party interventions in individual cases. 813 It may<br />

however be possible <strong>to</strong> intervene in the case by asking the<br />

applicant <strong>to</strong> include the third party interventions in his or her<br />

application, or <strong>to</strong> petition the treaty body on an ad hoc basis.<br />

As for the European Court of Human Rights, according <strong>to</strong><br />

Article 36 ECHR, in all cases before Chambers or the Grand<br />

Chamber, the “President of the Court may, in the interest of<br />

the proper administration of <strong>justice</strong>, invite any High Contracting<br />

809<br />

Poleshchuk v. Russia, ECtHR, op. cit., fn. 1369; Cotlet v. Romania,<br />

ECtHR, op. cit., fn. 1369.<br />

810<br />

Akdivar v. Turkey, ECtHR, op. cit., fn. 937.<br />

811<br />

See, Kurt v. Turkey, ECtHR, op. cit., fn. 724; and Ilascu and Others<br />

v. Russia and Moldova, ECtHR, op. cit., fn. 406.<br />

812<br />

Agiza v. Sweden, CAT, op. cit., fn. 332, para. 13.9.<br />

813<br />

The rules of procedure of the Human Rights Committee or the OP-<br />

ICCPR do not mention third party interventions. See also, Article 8.1<br />

OP-ICESCR; Rule 118.2, CAT Rules of Procedure; Rule 95.2, CERD<br />

Rules of Procedure; Rule 72.2, CEDAW Rules of Procedures.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!