08.03.2016 Views

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

342 PRACTITIONERS GUIDE No. 12<br />

<strong>to</strong> abide by the final judgment of the Court in any case <strong>to</strong> which<br />

they are parties”. 930 The Court’s judgments are therefore<br />

binding. The Committee of Ministers will examine whether the<br />

State Party has paid the awarded just satisfaction and the<br />

potential default interests, 931 whether “individual measures<br />

have been taken <strong>to</strong> ensure that the violation has ceased and<br />

that the injured party is put, as far as possible, in the same<br />

situation as that party enjoyed prior <strong>to</strong> the violation of the<br />

Convention [, and/or] general measures have been adopted,<br />

preventing new violations similar <strong>to</strong> that or those found or<br />

putting an end <strong>to</strong> continuing violations”. 932 If the Committee of<br />

Ministers considers that a State Party has refused <strong>to</strong> abide by<br />

the final judgment, it may, after formal notice and with a twothirds<br />

absolute majority decision, refer the case <strong>to</strong> the Court for<br />

lack of implementation of the judgment. The Court can then<br />

rule on the violation of Article 46 ECHR and refer the case <strong>to</strong><br />

the Committee for measures <strong>to</strong> be taken. 933 Exceptionally,<br />

where new facts come <strong>to</strong> light within a year of a judgment, a<br />

party may request revision of the judgment. 934<br />

The American Convention on Human Rights does not establish<br />

any institutional role for the political organs of the Organisation<br />

of American States <strong>to</strong> supervise enforcement of the Inter-<br />

American Court of Human Rights’ rulings. According <strong>to</strong><br />

Article 65 ACHR, the Court is obliged <strong>to</strong> submit an Annual<br />

Report <strong>to</strong> each regular session of the General Assembly of the<br />

OAS for its consideration. In this report, the Court will specify<br />

the cases in which a State has not complied with its judgments,<br />

930<br />

Article 46.1 ECHR.<br />

931<br />

Rule 6.2(a), Rules of the Committee of Ministers for the<br />

supervision of the execution of judgments and of the terms of<br />

friendly settlements, adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 10<br />

May 2006 at the 964th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies (CMCE<br />

Rules for execution of judgments).<br />

932<br />

Rule 6.2(b), CMCE Rules for execution of judgments.<br />

933<br />

See, Article 46 ECHR.<br />

934<br />

Rules 79-80, ECtHR Rules of Procedure.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!