08.03.2016 Views

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

100 PRACTITIONERS GUIDE No. 12<br />

parties: “<strong>to</strong> establish legal protection of the rights of women on<br />

an equal basis with men and <strong>to</strong> ensure through competent<br />

national tribunals and other public institutions the effective<br />

protection of women against any act of discrimination”.<br />

States should take note of individual remedies provided under<br />

the Convention and address systemic issues that lead <strong>to</strong> the<br />

violation of the individual’s rights. 250<br />

Concerning access <strong>to</strong> remedies and reparation, the CEDAW<br />

Committee has said:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Crimes of violence against women should be dealt with<br />

in a fair, impartial, timely and expeditious manner. 251<br />

Protection orders must be available (for example, <strong>to</strong><br />

protect against taking a girl abroad <strong>to</strong> commit an act of<br />

female genital mutilation, or <strong>to</strong> protect against violent<br />

spouses) and enforced in practice. This is a stringent<br />

requirement of result. 252<br />

States parties must ensure that women are made aware<br />

of their rights. 253<br />

Free legal services need <strong>to</strong> be made available so that<br />

women have the practical means <strong>to</strong> seek vindication of<br />

their rights. 254<br />

All relevant ac<strong>to</strong>rs in the <strong>justice</strong> system need <strong>to</strong> be<br />

aware of women’s human rights. 255<br />

250<br />

CEDAW Commentary, above note 240, page 85; and A.T. v<br />

Hungary, CEDAW Communication No 2/2003 (26 January 2005),<br />

paragraph 9.6(I)(a)-(h).<br />

251<br />

Vertido v Philippines, above note 248, paragraph 8.3.<br />

252<br />

Angela González Carreño v Spain, CEDAW Communication No<br />

47/2012, UN Doc CEDAW/C/58/D/47/2012 (2014), paragraph 9.9.<br />

253<br />

CEDAW Commentary, above note 240, page 84.<br />

254<br />

Ibid, page 84.<br />

255<br />

Ibid, page 85.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!