08.03.2016 Views

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

V<br />

WOMEN’S ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOR GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE 75<br />

‣ Reviewing and reforming laws that enable conduct<br />

that amounts <strong>to</strong> gross human rights violations.<br />

The Human Rights Committee, 194 the CEDAW Committee 195 and<br />

the Committee against Torture 196 also speak of the obligation of<br />

194<br />

Human Rights Committee, General Comment No 31, above note<br />

176, paragraph 16: “Article 2, paragraph 3, requires that States<br />

Parties make reparation <strong>to</strong> individuals whose Covenant rights have<br />

been violated. Without reparation <strong>to</strong> individuals whose Covenant rights<br />

have been violated, the obligation <strong>to</strong> provide an effective remedy,<br />

which is central <strong>to</strong> the efficacy of article 2, paragraph 3, is not<br />

discharged. In addition <strong>to</strong> the explicit reparation required by articles 9,<br />

paragraph 5, and 14, paragraph 6, the Committee considers that the<br />

Covenant generally entails appropriate compensation. The Committee<br />

notes that, where appropriate, reparation can involve restitution,<br />

rehabilitation and measures of satisfaction, such as public apologies,<br />

public memorials, guarantees of non-repetition and changes in<br />

relevant laws and practices, as well as bringing <strong>to</strong> <strong>justice</strong> the<br />

perpetra<strong>to</strong>rs of human rights violations.”<br />

195<br />

CEDAW General Recommendation No 28, above note 167,<br />

paragraph 32: “Paragraph 2 (b) contains the obligation of States<br />

parties <strong>to</strong> ensure that legislation prohibiting discrimination and<br />

promoting equality of women and men provides appropriate remedies<br />

for women who are subjected <strong>to</strong> discrimination contrary <strong>to</strong> the<br />

Convention. This obligation requires that States parties provide<br />

reparation <strong>to</strong> women whose rights under the Convention have been<br />

violated. Without reparation the obligation <strong>to</strong> provide an appropriate<br />

remedy is not discharged. Such remedies should include different<br />

forms of reparation, such as monetary compensation, restitution,<br />

rehabilitation and reinstatement; measures of satisfaction, such as<br />

public apologies, public memorials and guarantees of non-repetition;<br />

changes in relevant laws and practices; and bringing <strong>to</strong> <strong>justice</strong> the<br />

perpetra<strong>to</strong>rs of violations of human rights of women.”<br />

196<br />

Committee against Torture, General Comment No 3,<br />

“Implementation of article 14 by States parties”, UN Doc CAT/C/GC/3<br />

(2012), paragraph 6, which explains that the term “redress” is used in<br />

Article 14 of the Convention against Torture <strong>to</strong> include “the following<br />

five forms of reparation: restitution, compensation, rehabilitation,<br />

satisfaction and guarantees of non-repetition. The Committee<br />

recognises the elements of full redress under international and<br />

practice as outlined in the Basic Principles and <strong>Guide</strong>lines on the Right<br />

<strong>to</strong> a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!