08.03.2016 Views

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

V<br />

WOMEN’S ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOR GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE 65<br />

wives, 171 children, 172 or relatives 173 after a his<strong>to</strong>ry of domestic<br />

violence.<br />

Most violence against women is neither perpetrated by State<br />

ac<strong>to</strong>rs nor by non-State ac<strong>to</strong>rs whose conduct is attributable <strong>to</strong><br />

the State. However, while the State itself will not typically be<br />

directly responsible for violence against women that arises from<br />

the conduct of non-State ac<strong>to</strong>rs, it remains responsible for<br />

taking measures <strong>to</strong> ensure that persons under its jurisdiction<br />

are protected from threats <strong>to</strong> the enjoyment of human rights<br />

brought about by the conduct of non-State ac<strong>to</strong>rs.<br />

Under contemporary international human rights law, this<br />

obligation is categorized as an obligation <strong>to</strong> protect. The<br />

measures <strong>to</strong> be employed by States extend <strong>to</strong> preventing and<br />

s<strong>to</strong>pping abuses, but also <strong>to</strong> ensuring that those subjected <strong>to</strong><br />

such abuses can access effective remedies and reparation and<br />

that those responsible are held <strong>to</strong> account.<br />

In relation <strong>to</strong> States parties’ obligations under the CEDAW<br />

Convention, the CEDAW Committee has explained that the<br />

obligation <strong>to</strong> protect requires that States parties “protect<br />

women from discrimination by private ac<strong>to</strong>rs and take steps<br />

directly aimed at eliminating cus<strong>to</strong>mary and all other practice<br />

that prejudice and perpetuate the notion of inferiority or<br />

superiority of either of the sexes, and of stereotyped roles for<br />

171<br />

Goecke v Austria, CEDAW Communication No 5/2005, UN Doc<br />

CEDAW/C/39/D/5/2005 (2007); and Yildirim v Austria, CEDAW<br />

Communication No 6/2005, UN Doc CEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005 (2007).<br />

172<br />

Angela González Carreño v Spain, CEDAW Communication No<br />

47/2012, UN Doc CEDAW/C/58/D/47/2012 (2014). See also Jessica<br />

Lenahan (Gonzales) et al v the United States, Inter-American<br />

Commission on Human Rights Case No 12.626, Report No. 80/11 (21<br />

July 2011), which relates <strong>to</strong> the kidnapping and killing of three<br />

children, although it is not clear whether the children were killed by<br />

their father or by law enforcement officials: however the case outlined<br />

in detail the State’s obligation <strong>to</strong> enforce protection orders and<br />

therefore prevent killing of children known <strong>to</strong> be at risk.<br />

173<br />

Opuz v Turkey (2009) ECHR 870.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!