08.03.2016 Views

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

66 PRACTITIONERS GUIDE No. 12<br />

men and women”. 174 The Committee also emphasized that<br />

States could be held responsible for private acts if they “fail <strong>to</strong><br />

act with due diligence <strong>to</strong> prevent violations of rights, or <strong>to</strong><br />

investigate and punish acts of violence, and for providing<br />

compensation”. 175<br />

The UN Human Rights Committee has similarly affirmed the<br />

duty <strong>to</strong> protect in relation <strong>to</strong> State obligations under the ICCPR.<br />

In its General Comment 31, the Human Rights Committee<br />

affirmed that, whilst the ICCPR cannot be viewed as a<br />

substitute for domestic criminal or civil law, “the positive<br />

obligations on States Parties <strong>to</strong> ensure Covenant rights will only<br />

be fully discharged if individuals are protected by the State, not<br />

just against violations of Covenant rights by its agents, but also<br />

against acts committed by private persons or entities that<br />

would impair the enjoyment of Covenant rights in so far as<br />

they are amenable <strong>to</strong> application between private persons or<br />

entities.” 176 The Committee affirmed that States failing <strong>to</strong> act<br />

with due diligence <strong>to</strong> “prevent, punish, investigate or redress<br />

the harm” that private persons have caused may give rise <strong>to</strong><br />

174<br />

CEDAW General Recommendation No 28, above note 167,<br />

paragraph 9.<br />

175<br />

CEDAW General Recommendation No 19, above note 170,<br />

paragraph 9; and CEDAW General Recommendation No 28, above<br />

note 167, paragraph 13: “Article 2 is not limited <strong>to</strong> the prohibition of<br />

discrimination against women caused directly or indirectly by States<br />

parties. Article 2 also imposes a due diligence obligation on States<br />

parties <strong>to</strong> prevent discrimination by private ac<strong>to</strong>rs. In some cases, a<br />

private ac<strong>to</strong>r’s acts or omission of acts may be attributed <strong>to</strong> the State<br />

under international law. States parties are thus obliged <strong>to</strong> ensure that<br />

private ac<strong>to</strong>rs do not engage in discrimination against women as<br />

defined in the Convention. The appropriate measures that States<br />

parties are obliged <strong>to</strong> take include the regulation of the activities of<br />

private ac<strong>to</strong>rs with regard <strong>to</strong> education, employment and health<br />

policies and practices, working conditions and work standards, and<br />

other areas in which private ac<strong>to</strong>rs provide services or facilities, such<br />

as banking and housing.”<br />

176<br />

Human Rights Committee, General Comment No 31, “The Nature of<br />

the General Legal Obligation Imposed on States Parties <strong>to</strong> the<br />

Covenant”, UN Doc CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.13 (2004), paragraph 8.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!