08.03.2016 Views

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

V<br />

WOMEN’S ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOR GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE 239<br />

<strong>to</strong> ascertain that the hymen is still present, or the insertion of<br />

two fingers in<strong>to</strong> the vagina (known as the “two finger” test) <strong>to</strong><br />

assess whether the vagina has a laxity which proves that the<br />

woman or girl is accus<strong>to</strong>med <strong>to</strong> sexual intercourse.<br />

These tests are used in a variety of ways. For example, in India<br />

and Bangladesh, these tests are used <strong>to</strong> ascertain whether a<br />

woman has been raped. However, they have also been used as<br />

a means of social control and <strong>to</strong> deter the exercise of other<br />

rights. This allegedly occurred during the popular protests of<br />

the “Arab Spring” in 2011. While the tests were purportedly<br />

administered as a safeguard <strong>to</strong> “prove” that the women were<br />

not raped in cus<strong>to</strong>dy, they also served <strong>to</strong> threaten the women<br />

that they would be prosecuted for prostitution if they “failed”<br />

the test and <strong>to</strong> stereotype and marginalize women protesters in<br />

an attempt <strong>to</strong> deter these women, and other Egyptian women,<br />

from participating in public life. 646<br />

These alleged “tests” are unscientific and do not prove anything<br />

about the sexual experiences of the woman. In addition <strong>to</strong><br />

being profoundly psychologically humiliating, and physically<br />

very painful, their administration constitutes a form of<br />

discrimination, which is unlawful under the CEDAW Convention<br />

and other standards. Forcing a woman or girl <strong>to</strong> undergo such a<br />

procedure as a requirement of the criminal <strong>justice</strong> system is a<br />

form of <strong>to</strong>rture and ill-treatment.<br />

Virginity tests: no scientific value, discrimina<strong>to</strong>ry and<br />

violating the rule against <strong>to</strong>rture or cruel, inhuman or<br />

degrading treatment<br />

The Independent Forensic Expert Group (IFEG), consisting of<br />

thirty-five independent forensic experts from eighteen<br />

countries, released a statement on the practice of “virginity<br />

testing” in December 2014.<br />

646<br />

See Amnesty International, “Egypt: A year after ‘virginity tests’,<br />

women victims of army violence still seek <strong>justice</strong>”, 9 March 2012, URL:<br />

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2012/03/egypt-year-aftervirginity-tests-women-victims-army-violence-still-seek-<strong>justice</strong>/.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!