08.03.2016 Views

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

200 PRACTITIONERS GUIDE No. 12<br />

which are coercive”: the definition did not make it necessary<br />

for a rapist <strong>to</strong> use force. 529 Building on this, when the Rome<br />

Statute of the International Criminal Court was elaborated in<br />

1998, the Elements of Crimes in the Statute recognized that<br />

rape is present where the perpetra<strong>to</strong>r uses “force, or by threat<br />

of force or coercion, such as that caused by fear of violence,<br />

duress, detention, psychological oppression or abuse of power,<br />

against such person or another person, or by taking advantage<br />

of a coercive environment, or the invasion was committed<br />

against a person incapable of giving genuine consent”. 530<br />

Rule 70 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the<br />

International Criminal Court recognized that a main point of<br />

inquiry for the Court in rape trials is whether a perpetra<strong>to</strong>r<br />

used “force, threat of force, coercion” or was “taking advantage<br />

529<br />

Prosecu<strong>to</strong>r v Akayesu, Case No ICTR-96-4, Trial Judgment 2<br />

September 1998, paragraph 596-598.<br />

530<br />

The non-contextual elements of the definition of rape as a crime<br />

against humanity and a war crime in the Elements of Crimes are the<br />

same. The only differences in the elements of these two crimes are<br />

the legal contextual ones distinguishing rape as a crime against<br />

humanity from rape as a war crime. The common elements are: 1)<br />

The perpetra<strong>to</strong>r invaded [A footnote here reads: ‘The concept of<br />

“invasion” is intended <strong>to</strong> be broad enough <strong>to</strong> be gender-neutral’] the<br />

body of a person by conduct resulting in penetration, however slight,<br />

of any part of the body of the victim or of the perpetra<strong>to</strong>r with a<br />

sexual organ, or of the anal or genital opening of the victim with any<br />

object or any other part of the body. 2) The invasion was committed<br />

by force, or by threat of force or coercion, such as that caused by fear<br />

of violence, duress, detention, psychological oppression or abuse of<br />

power, against such person or another person, or by taking advantage<br />

of a coercive environment, or the invasion was committed against a<br />

person incapable of giving genuine consent. [A footnote here reads: ‘It<br />

is unders<strong>to</strong>od that a person may be incapable of giving genuine<br />

consent if affected by natural, induced or age-related incapacity’]. See<br />

International Criminal Court, “Elements of Crimes” (2011), Elements 1<br />

and 2 of the Elements of Crimes relating <strong>to</strong> the crime against<br />

humanity of rape under Article 7(1)(g)-1 (page 8) and the war crime<br />

of rape in international and non-international armed conflicts under<br />

Article 8(2)(b)(xxii)-1 (page 28) and Article 8(2)(e)(vi)-1 (pages 36-<br />

37).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!