08.03.2016 Views

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

30 PRACTITIONERS GUIDE No. 12<br />

integrity cannot be superseded by other rights, including the<br />

right <strong>to</strong> property and the right <strong>to</strong> privacy”. 50<br />

Parental rights of fathers <strong>to</strong> have contact with their children<br />

may be invoked as entitlement of men accused of violence <strong>to</strong><br />

violate the safety and well being of women and their children.<br />

However, in such a situation, the CEDAW Committee has<br />

observed that the best interests of the child must be taken in<strong>to</strong><br />

account in the existence of a context of domestic violence. 51<br />

Relatedly, because legal obligations surrounding violence<br />

against women arise under international law, competing<br />

domestic law claims cannot be used <strong>to</strong> override these claims. 52<br />

50<br />

A.T. v Hungary, CEDAW Communication No 2/2003 (26 January<br />

2005), paragraph 9.3.<br />

51<br />

Angela González Carreño v Spain, CEDAW Communication No<br />

47/2012, UN Doc CEDAW/C/58/D/47/2012 (2014), paragraph 9.4:<br />

“The Committee observes that during the time when the regime of<br />

judicially determined visits was being applied, both the judicial<br />

authorities and the social services and psychological experts had as<br />

their main purpose normalizing relations between father and daughter,<br />

despite the reservations expressed by those two services on the<br />

conduct of F.R.C. The relevant decisions do not disclose an interest by<br />

those authorities in evaluating all aspects of the benefits or harms <strong>to</strong><br />

the child of the regime applied. It is also noteworthy that the decision<br />

which ushered in a regime of unsupervised visits was adopted without<br />

a prior hearing of the author and her daughter, and that the continued<br />

non-payment of child support by F.R.C. was not taken in<strong>to</strong> account in<br />

that context. All of these elements reflect a pattern of action which<br />

responds <strong>to</strong> a stereotyped conception of visiting rights based on<br />

formal equality which, in the present case, gave clear advantages <strong>to</strong><br />

the father despite his abusive conduct and minimized the situation of<br />

mother and daughter as victims of violence, placing them in a<br />

vulnerable position. In this connection, the Committee recalls that in<br />

matters of child cus<strong>to</strong>dy and visiting rights, the best interests of the<br />

child must be a central concern and that when national authorities<br />

adopt decisions in that regard they must take in<strong>to</strong> account the<br />

existence of a context of domestic violence.”<br />

52<br />

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 1155 UNTS 331, Article<br />

27: “A party may not invoke the provisions of its internal law as<br />

justification for its failure <strong>to</strong> perform a treaty”.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!