08.03.2016 Views

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

V<br />

WOMEN’S ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOR GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE 219<br />

his<strong>to</strong>ry are easily perceived as a sign of mistrust or doubt on<br />

the part of the examiner”. 580<br />

The aim in gathering medical evidence should be <strong>to</strong> provide “an<br />

objective service without sacrificing sensitivity or<br />

compassion”. 581 In prosecuting cases, impartiality is an<br />

essential element in giving medical evidence, and medical<br />

professionals must resist any direct or indirect pressures that<br />

investiga<strong>to</strong>rs may knowingly or unknowingly place upon them<br />

<strong>to</strong> produce decisive evidence that can conclude a case. 582<br />

Medical examiners must address their own personal attitudes,<br />

particularly in cultures of victim-blaming or that are generally<br />

discrimina<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>to</strong>wards women, <strong>to</strong> avoid any form of<br />

judgemental questioning or conduct that might impair their<br />

objectivity, such as leading questions about the victims attire<br />

or actions prior <strong>to</strong> assault. 583 Health workers must also ensure<br />

they do not let any personal preferences, principles or<br />

prejudices affect their conduct <strong>to</strong>wards or discriminate against<br />

women subjected <strong>to</strong> violence. 584<br />

The UN Handbook for Legislation on Violence against Women<br />

has specified the following requirements for medico-legal<br />

evidence. Legislation should:<br />

580<br />

Ibid, paragraph 270.<br />

581<br />

WHO <strong>Guide</strong>lines, above note 578, page 20.<br />

582<br />

Ibid, page 20: “Investiga<strong>to</strong>rs, consciously or unconsciously, may<br />

bring considerable pressure <strong>to</strong> bear on health care practitioners <strong>to</strong><br />

provide an interpretation that would resolve an issue. These forces<br />

may be direct and forceful, or subtle and insidious, and are likely <strong>to</strong> be<br />

particularly strong in situations where the practitioner has a formal<br />

relationship with an investigating authority, where a close personal<br />

relationship has developed between the investiga<strong>to</strong>r and the<br />

practitioner, or when the individual roles of the investiga<strong>to</strong>r and the<br />

practitioner become blurred. Fairness may also be compromised when<br />

the practitioner develops an unconscious or misplaced desire <strong>to</strong> help<br />

investiga<strong>to</strong>rs.”<br />

583<br />

Ibid.<br />

584<br />

Ibid.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!