08.03.2016 Views

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

V<br />

WOMEN’S ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOR GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE 39<br />

Rape and sexual violence by non-State ac<strong>to</strong>rs. 81<br />

Intrusive physical examinations by prison staff, which<br />

may constitute a form of rape and <strong>to</strong>rture. 82<br />

Use of restraints during pregnancy, labour and the postnatal<br />

period. 83<br />

Domestic violence 84 (also known as violence in the<br />

family or ‘intimate partner violence’), whether physical,<br />

sexual, or psychological. 85<br />

81<br />

Human Rights Committee, General Comment No 28, above note 71,<br />

paragraphs 8, 11 and 24. Paragraph 24 provides: “A different fac<strong>to</strong>r<br />

that may affect women's right <strong>to</strong> marry only when they have given<br />

free and full consent is the existence of social attitudes which tend <strong>to</strong><br />

marginalize women victims of rape and put pressure on them <strong>to</strong> agree<br />

<strong>to</strong> marriage. A woman's free and full consent <strong>to</strong> marriage may also be<br />

undermined by laws which allow the rapist <strong>to</strong> have his criminal<br />

responsibility extinguished or mitigated if he marries the victim. States<br />

parties should indicate whether marrying the victim extinguishes or<br />

mitigates criminal responsibility and in the case in which the victim is<br />

a minor whether the rape reduces the marriageable age of the victim,<br />

particularly in societies where rape victims have <strong>to</strong> endure<br />

marginalization from society.” See also Committee against Torture,<br />

General Comment No 2, “Implementation of article 2 by States<br />

parties”, UN Doc CAT/C/GC/2 (2008), paragraph 18.<br />

82<br />

Miguel Castro-Castro Prison v Peru, Inter-American Court of Human<br />

Rights, 25 November 2006.<br />

83<br />

Human Rights Committee, Concluding Observations: Third Periodic<br />

Report of the United States of America, UN Doc<br />

CCPR/C/USA/CO/3/Rev.1 (2006), paragraph 33, which refers <strong>to</strong><br />

concern at the shackling of detained women during childbirth, citing<br />

Articles 7 and 10 of the ICCPR. See also the United Nations Rules for<br />

the Treatment of Women Prisoners and Non-cus<strong>to</strong>dial Measures for<br />

Women Offenders (the Bangkok Rules), adopted by the General<br />

Assembly under resolution 65/229 (2010), Rule 24 of which provides:<br />

“Instruments of restraint shall never be used on women during labour,<br />

during birth and immediately after birth”.<br />

84<br />

Human Right Committee, General Comment No 28, above note 71,<br />

paragraph 11; and Committee against Torture, General Comment No<br />

2, above note 81, paragraph 18. The Committee has made clear that<br />

where State authorities or others acting in official capacity or under<br />

colour of law, know or have reasonable grounds <strong>to</strong> believe that acts of<br />

<strong>to</strong>rture or ill-treatment are being committed by non-State officials or

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!