08.03.2016 Views

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

Universal-Womens-accesss-to-justice-Publications-Practitioners-Guide-Series-2016-ENG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

V<br />

WOMEN’S ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOR GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE 127<br />

a fair trial and urged the State Party <strong>to</strong> ensure that<br />

all criminal proceedings involving rape and other<br />

sexual offences are conducted free from prejudices<br />

or stereotypical notions regarding the victim’s<br />

gender, age and disability. The Committee also<br />

called on the Philippines <strong>to</strong> institute effective<br />

training of the judiciary and legal professionals <strong>to</strong><br />

eradicate gender bias from court proceedings and<br />

decision-making. 344<br />

<br />

Domestic violence and the constraints of family law.<br />

‣ In the cases of Isa<strong>to</strong>u Jallow v Bulgaria 345 and<br />

Ángela González Carreño v Spain 346 the CEDAW<br />

Committee found that the parental right of the<br />

father <strong>to</strong> access <strong>to</strong> his child had been prioritized<br />

over the safety and well-being of the mother and<br />

child.<br />

‣ In the case of Isa<strong>to</strong>u Jallow v Bulgaria the<br />

Committee observed that “the authorities based<br />

their activities on a stereotyped notion that the<br />

husband was superior and that his opinions should<br />

be taken seriously, disregarding the fact that<br />

domestic violence proportionally affects women<br />

considerably more than men”. 347<br />

‣ The case of Ángela González Carreño v Spain<br />

considered a situation where a child was murdered<br />

during a contact visit by her father in the context of<br />

a long-term situation of domestic violence. The<br />

CEDAW Committee said:<br />

“Based on stereotypes, the right of visitation was<br />

seen merely as a right of the father and not as a<br />

right of the child as well. The best interests of the<br />

child would have required if not eliminating the<br />

344<br />

R.P.B. v. The Philippines, ibid, paragraph 9(b)(iii-iv).<br />

345<br />

Jallow v Bulgaria, CEDAW Communication 32/2011, UN Doc<br />

CEDAW/C/52/D32/2011 (2012), paragraph 3.5.<br />

346<br />

Carreño v Spain, above note 252, paragraphs 3.9-3.10.<br />

347<br />

Jallow v Bulgaria, above note 345, paragraph 8.6.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!