18.05.2016 Views

UNESCO Ancient Civilizations of Africa (Editor G. Mokhtar)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Egypt's relations with the rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>Africa</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> the Nile, and to Ethiopia with its wealth <strong>of</strong> ivory. Southwards a major<br />

obstacle would probably have been the extensive marshlands which the<br />

Egyptians would have found difficult to reach or cross, and which<br />

throughout antiquity protected the secret <strong>of</strong> the very high Nile valleys.<br />

Although we can today follow the history <strong>of</strong> Egypt's northern relations and<br />

<strong>of</strong> the portages between the Red Sea and the Nile fairly easily, archaeological<br />

data concerning the ancient Egyptians' land-ward relations with the<br />

distant south are sadly lacking.<br />

Therefore, for the time being we have to resort to more or less probable<br />

suppositions, based on texts, linguistics, ethnology or simply common<br />

sense. But the history <strong>of</strong> Egypt has been considered for so long by the<br />

Egyptologists themselves as Mediterranean and white that it is now<br />

necessary to change research techniques and materials, and especially the<br />

research workers' mentality in order to replace the land <strong>of</strong> the Pharaohs in<br />

its <strong>Africa</strong>n context.<br />

Southern neighbours: the Egyptians, the upper Nile basins,<br />

their links with <strong>Africa</strong><br />

The most recent archaeological excavations, the findings <strong>of</strong> which are <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

as yet unpublished, highlight similarities between the Khartoum area and<br />

the lower Nile valley in the Neolithic age; similarities which are very difficult<br />

to explain.<br />

With the Old Kingdom, however, this apparent similarity ceased to exist.<br />

Already in the first dynasty forts protected the south <strong>of</strong> Egypt against its<br />

southern neighbours. More and more, throughout their long common history,<br />

political and cultural differences and conflicting interests separated the<br />

territories north <strong>of</strong> the First Cataract from those that lie south <strong>of</strong> the Fourth<br />

Cataract. Nevertheless, relations, which were complex and diverse, were<br />

never completely broken <strong>of</strong>f between the Egyptians and their southern<br />

neighbours whom they called the Nehesi.<br />

At all events, Lower Nubia interested the Egyptians on account <strong>of</strong> the<br />

gold it produced, and the more southerly Nilotic regions because <strong>of</strong> the<br />

routes leading to the <strong>Africa</strong>n interior by the White Nile, the Saharan<br />

valleys or Darfur. Throughout the history <strong>of</strong> Egypt, access to the south<br />

was a predominant concern. This probably also explains the importance<br />

attributed to the control <strong>of</strong> the western oases, another access route<br />

parallel to the Nile.<br />

From the beginning <strong>of</strong> the Old Kingdom, the Sudan, like Libya,<br />

represented for the Egyptians a source <strong>of</strong> manpower, 14 livestock and<br />

14. Pharaoh Snefru stated that he had brought back 7000 men from the south, from<br />

a land called Ta-Seti. Seti = archaic type <strong>of</strong> bow. A. H. Gardiner, 1950, p. 512. Ta-Seti =<br />

Land <strong>of</strong> those who carry the Seti bow. It is interesting to note that all the Sudanese tribes<br />

up to the Congo basin carry this same bow.<br />

141

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!