18.05.2016 Views

UNESCO Ancient Civilizations of Africa (Editor G. Mokhtar)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Ancient</strong> <strong>Civilizations</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Africa</strong><br />

the cultural foundations <strong>of</strong> this highly populous zone <strong>of</strong> East <strong>Africa</strong> are<br />

more ancient than its present Bantu and Lwoo languages.<br />

The East <strong>Africa</strong>n 'megalithic' problem<br />

In the older literature on eastern <strong>Africa</strong> and its history there was<br />

considerable discussion <strong>of</strong> advanced civilizations in Antiquity. These were<br />

posited in the interlacustrine region and more particularly in the highlands<br />

<strong>of</strong> Kenya and northern Tanzania (the old Kushitic zone, interestingly),<br />

among others. Such historical views were based on a mixture <strong>of</strong><br />

ethnographic traits, unscientifically collected 'oral traditions' and archaeological<br />

observations, the last consisting <strong>of</strong> the remains <strong>of</strong> supposed<br />

'engineering' works and the ruins <strong>of</strong> buildings and terraces <strong>of</strong> dry-stone<br />

(that is 'megalithic'). Unfortunately, much <strong>of</strong> the primary evidence was<br />

inaccurately recorded, or even where accurate, was illogically interpreted<br />

or correlated with quite irrelevant materials to please fanciful historical<br />

outlooks which were fashionable at the time, notably the notorious Hamitic<br />

ideas. This tendency was all too eagerly taken up by secondary writers<br />

who uncritically accepted and in some cases irresponsibly exaggerated the<br />

supposed primary evidence. Equally illogical was the presumption so <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

made that various types <strong>of</strong> archaeological features, whether genuine or<br />

bogus, whether with or without stonework, distributed over a wide region,<br />

should be attributable to a single people or culture at a particular period<br />

<strong>of</strong> the past. Such a presumption underlay Huntingford's theory <strong>of</strong> an<br />

Azanian civilization in Kenya and northern Tanzania, which he attributed<br />

to Hamites, and equally Murdock's hypothesis <strong>of</strong> megalithic Kushites<br />

having once inhabited the same general region. (Murdock, by the way, was<br />

specifically opposed to the Hamitic prejudices <strong>of</strong> earlier writers.)<br />

The word megalithic is thus a loaded one which serves no cultural or<br />

historical purpose in East <strong>Africa</strong>. It is worth, nevertheless, briefly noting<br />

and commenting on those features which have been cited as evidence <strong>of</strong><br />

ancient megalithic cultures. Not all are in fact stone constructions. In this<br />

chapter mention was made <strong>of</strong> the cairns (or stone mounds), which represent<br />

graves, frequently encountered in the pastures <strong>of</strong> Kenya and northern<br />

Tanzania. Many, if not most, <strong>of</strong> these date to the end <strong>of</strong> the late stone<br />

age between two and three thousand years ago and are probably the work<br />

<strong>of</strong> Kushitic-speaking peoples. But some may be more recent. It is possible,<br />

but by no means certain, that some <strong>of</strong> the rock-cut wells which occur<br />

in the drier pastures <strong>of</strong> southern Masailand in Tanzania and also <strong>of</strong> eastern<br />

and northern Kenya may date back to the same period, when cattle were<br />

introduced. So perhaps may some <strong>of</strong> the so-called ancient roads in the<br />

highlands, which are in fact nothing more than cattle-tracks accidentally<br />

eroded by the continual passing <strong>of</strong> herds across ridges and down slopes<br />

to water over periods <strong>of</strong> time. Many <strong>of</strong> these are still being enlarged, and<br />

new ones started. Less likely to extend back so far are the practices <strong>of</strong><br />

590

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!