18.05.2016 Views

UNESCO Ancient Civilizations of Africa (Editor G. Mokhtar)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Ancient</strong> <strong>Civilizations</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Africa</strong><br />

that the link with the Waren tribe <strong>of</strong> Raydan is explicitly mentioned shows<br />

the importance which these kings attached to their south Arabian descent.<br />

The title <strong>of</strong> mukarrib <strong>of</strong> D'iamat and <strong>of</strong> Saba' may be explained in various<br />

ways: it might refer to south Arabian regions whose princes had extended<br />

their rule to northern Ethiopia; these terms might represent <strong>Africa</strong>n districts<br />

to which south Arabian colonists had given the names <strong>of</strong> their home<br />

provinces; or they might have a purely political and non-territorial significance.<br />

The firsthypothesis seems most improbable and we must agree<br />

with A. J. Drewes that these dynasts no doubt exercised the power <strong>of</strong><br />

mukarrib <strong>of</strong> Saba' over their subjects from south Arabia or <strong>of</strong> south Arabian<br />

extraction. The titles <strong>of</strong> 'King Sr'n, <strong>of</strong> the tribe <strong>of</strong> Yg'd' might be read:<br />

'King <strong>of</strong> the Tsar'ane,~<strong>of</strong> the tribe <strong>of</strong> the Ig'azyan'; they would show that<br />

they also ruled the native part <strong>of</strong> the population and that they were<br />

descended from the local tribe <strong>of</strong> Yg'd (or Igz) in which A. J. Drewes<br />

sees the ancestors <strong>of</strong> the Ge'ez.<br />

Three fragmentary inscriptions, those <strong>of</strong> Abba Pantalewon, the altar at<br />

Addi Galamo and the pantheon <strong>of</strong> Enda Çerqos, allude to a historical<br />

event that seems to have taken place during the reign <strong>of</strong> Rbh. It concerns the<br />

capture and sacking <strong>of</strong> D'iamat, 'its eastern part and its western part, its<br />

reds and its blacks'. Unfortunately, the identification <strong>of</strong> this region and <strong>of</strong><br />

the aggressors remains in doubt.<br />

Architecture, works <strong>of</strong> art, epigraphy and the data provided by the texts<br />

on religious beliefs and social organization in northern Ethiopia all afford<br />

evidence <strong>of</strong> a strong south Arabian influence in the fifth and fourth<br />

centuries before our era. As F. Anfray reminds us, the emergence <strong>of</strong> this<br />

predominantly Semitic culture was preceded by several centuries <strong>of</strong> silent<br />

penetration; 'small groups <strong>of</strong> immigrants peddled south Arabian culture',<br />

no doubt under the pressure <strong>of</strong> economic and demographic circumstances<br />

which we do not yet understand. 60 It is not impossible, as the same<br />

investigator suggests, that these colonists introduced new agricultural<br />

techniques, in particular the use <strong>of</strong> the swing-plough, and built the firststone<br />

villages <strong>of</strong> Ethiopia.<br />

From the work <strong>of</strong> L. Ricci and A. J. Drewes, we get the impression that<br />

the south Arabian element was preponderant in certain centres where an<br />

embryonic form <strong>of</strong> urban life grew up around a sanctuary, for instance,<br />

at Yeha, in the Melazo region, and perhaps also at Addi Galamo and<br />

Matara, whereas the basic local culture, with certain Nilotic additions, was<br />

better represented in the Erythrean region with the sites <strong>of</strong>'Acchele Guzaï,<br />

Addi Gramaten and Dibdib.<br />

The appearance <strong>of</strong> a cultural unit whose internal coherence is evident,<br />

however, throughout the northern part <strong>of</strong> the Ethiopian plateau must<br />

certainly have coincided with the rise to power and the survival as a<br />

dominant class <strong>of</strong> one group, but we shall probably never know whether<br />

60. F. Anfray, 1967, pp. 49-5°; 1968, pp. 353, 356.<br />

354

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!