18.05.2016 Views

UNESCO Ancient Civilizations of Africa (Editor G. Mokhtar)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Ancient</strong> <strong>Civilizations</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Africa</strong><br />

The identity and language affiliation <strong>of</strong> the inhabitants <strong>of</strong> Engaruka have<br />

not been definitely established. For it was a group which was broken up<br />

and assimilated piecemeal some 200 years ago. Despite the remarkable<br />

quality and extent <strong>of</strong> the dry-stonework, it seems that the people who lived<br />

and cultivated here had stagnated in relative isolation, by being forced<br />

to over-exploit the resources <strong>of</strong> their soil and their water supplies in very<br />

restricted areas. Theirs was a way <strong>of</strong> life which had specialized so far in<br />

a particular direction that it could not adapt.<br />

This then is the answer to romantically inclined historians who would<br />

make so much <strong>of</strong> Engaruka. It cannot be used to support theories <strong>of</strong> wideranging<br />

megalithic civilizations. Nor was it a city <strong>of</strong> 30 000 or more people,<br />

as was once conjectured -and as has been repeated in several books. Rather,<br />

it was a concentrated peasant community depending for subsistence on<br />

an unusually intensive agricultural system. It is remarkable, but in its local<br />

context and as an example <strong>of</strong> rural cultural development and collapse in<br />

a very special situation. Moreover, its main dating in the second millennium<br />

<strong>of</strong> our era now seems clear enough following recent investigations and radiocarbon<br />

tests. A first millennium date for some <strong>of</strong> the remains here, which<br />

was suggested in the 1960s as a result <strong>of</strong> some unexpectedly early radiocarbon<br />

determinations, is now believed to be an error, or at least unrepresentative<br />

<strong>of</strong> the remains as a whole.<br />

592

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!