18.05.2016 Views

UNESCO Ancient Civilizations of Africa (Editor G. Mokhtar)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Saharan trade<br />

The Carthaginian period<br />

The problem <strong>of</strong> Carthaginian contacts with Saharan peoples, and people<br />

living even farther south, is obscure. If communications or contacts existed<br />

they must have been based on Leptis Magna and Sabratha, since it is<br />

in this region that there are the fewest natural obstacles. Carthaginian<br />

concern to keep Greeks from the area has been cited as evidence that trade<br />

<strong>of</strong> some substance with the interior existed, since suitable agricultural land<br />

for settlement is scarce. In the fifth century Herodotus knew <strong>of</strong> two tribal<br />

groups, the Garamantes and Nasamones, in the regions south <strong>of</strong> the Syrtic<br />

gulf; he also said that it took thirty days to get from the coast to the<br />

region <strong>of</strong> the former tribe, presumably the population <strong>of</strong> Garama (Germa).<br />

It was via the Garamantes that the Romans obtained more knowledge <strong>of</strong><br />

the interior <strong>of</strong> <strong>Africa</strong> centuries later. A late story says that a Carthaginian<br />

named Mago crossed the desert three times. Unfortunately, up to the<br />

present such trade as existed has left no archaeological trace whatever,<br />

and in literature only carbuncles are mentioned as an article <strong>of</strong> desert<br />

commerce. Slaves were perhaps traded - the Garamantes are said to have<br />

pursued Ethiopians (i.e. Negro peoples) in four-horse chariots; ivory and<br />

skins are suggested, though these were readily available in the Maghreb;<br />

and gold from the Sudan is still more problematical, though not impossible.<br />

Recent archaeological evidence from Germa indicates that the earliest<br />

population growth is from the fifth or fourth century and that over<br />

succeeding centuries a considerable sedentary population based on agriculture<br />

grew up. This may be due to cultural influences extending from the<br />

Carthaginian sites on the coast. After the destruction <strong>of</strong> Carthage the<br />

Romans penetrated both to Germa and Ghadames and occasionally farther<br />

south, and there are some archaeological traces <strong>of</strong> imports from the<br />

Mediterranean world into the interior, but on a modest scale. The lack<br />

at this time <strong>of</strong> camels in North <strong>Africa</strong> explains the difficulty and irregularity<br />

<strong>of</strong> trans-Saharan travel. Even if Saharan conditions were not so severe<br />

in ancient as they have been in more recent times, this absence would<br />

make trade on any large scale extremely difficult. The integration <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Sahara and trans-Saharan regions into a wider cultural environment must<br />

therefore be dated to the early Arab period.<br />

The city <strong>of</strong> Carthage<br />

Although Carthage had the reputation <strong>of</strong> possessing enormous wealth this<br />

is not manifested for us in the archaeology, even allowing for the complete<br />

destruction <strong>of</strong> the city by the Romans. This is not to say that there were<br />

no important buildings as in other ancient cities <strong>of</strong> similar size. Carthage<br />

had an elaborate double artificial harbour, the outer for the use <strong>of</strong> merchant<br />

ships — how many could use it at one time is not known — and the inner<br />

which had quays and sheds for 220 warships, together with a control<br />

451

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!