18.05.2016 Views

UNESCO Ancient Civilizations of Africa (Editor G. Mokhtar)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

0<br />

The Sahara<br />

in classical antiquity<br />

P. SALAMA<br />

The traditional notion <strong>of</strong> 'classical antiquity' may appear a priori incompatible<br />

with the study <strong>of</strong> Saharan problems. These have a very particular<br />

classification. To take only one example: in Mediterranean archaeology,<br />

classical antiquity covers a period <strong>of</strong> roughly a thousand years, from the<br />

fifth century before our era to the fifth century <strong>of</strong> our era, but in the<br />

protohistory <strong>of</strong> the Sahara it would cover the end <strong>of</strong> the 'caballine' period<br />

and part <strong>of</strong> the 'Libyco-Berber', neither <strong>of</strong> these periods, moreover, being<br />

exactly datable. Any absolute chronology would therefore seem to be ruled<br />

out in this case.<br />

Nevertheless, during that same millennium, the Saharan universe<br />

was the scene <strong>of</strong> highly important events which were connected in large<br />

part with the history <strong>of</strong> the Graeco-Roman world. So I have no hesitation<br />

in using classical chronological criteria, which are valid for the whole <strong>of</strong><br />

the known world.<br />

How is the question <strong>of</strong> the Sahara <strong>of</strong> antiquity approached by the<br />

historian? First, Graeco-Latin textual sources must be examined: while<br />

the information collected is not always reliable, and may induce error, it<br />

is in principle <strong>of</strong> value. The next step is to bring modern methods <strong>of</strong><br />

scholarship to bear so as to correct the raw data little by little and shed<br />

light on the problem as a whole. That done, the Sahara <strong>of</strong> 'antiquity'<br />

will no longer be judged only from the outside. It will reveal its own<br />

personality.<br />

Contemporary textual sources and their overinterpretation<br />

We know the analytical methods <strong>of</strong> the ancient geographers and historians.<br />

Unable to visit inaccessible regions themselves, they gathered second-hand<br />

information which had a goodly share <strong>of</strong> error and fable. Terra incognita,<br />

the great desert, was not even given a name. Not until the Arabs came<br />

was the term 'Sahara' applied to that vast region which was like an<br />

enormous basin. The Greeks, and later on the Romans, spoke only <strong>of</strong> Inner<br />

Libya, a very vague geographical expression signifying what lay beyond<br />

the North <strong>Africa</strong>n territories, or Inner Ethiopia, a zone still farther south<br />

which derived its name from the dark skins <strong>of</strong> its inhabitants. Descriptions

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!