18.05.2016 Views

UNESCO Ancient Civilizations of Africa (Editor G. Mokhtar)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The beginnings <strong>of</strong> the iron age in southern <strong>Africa</strong><br />

south, beyond the southernmost penetration <strong>of</strong> the early iron age, appear<br />

to have adopted certain new cultural traits which are best seen as<br />

derived from contact, both direct and indirect, with early iron age settlers.<br />

These iate stone age' and related populations are discussed by J. E.<br />

Parkington in Chapter 26 <strong>of</strong> the present volume.<br />

Reconstruction <strong>of</strong> the early iron age in southern <strong>Africa</strong> must be based<br />

first and foremost on archaeological evidence. Unlike events <strong>of</strong> the later<br />

periods <strong>of</strong> the iron age, those <strong>of</strong> this time - which corresponds broadly<br />

with the first millennium <strong>of</strong> our era - lie effectively beyond the range <strong>of</strong><br />

oral tradition. As has been shown in an earlier chapter, attempts have been<br />

made to base historical reconstructions <strong>of</strong> the pre-literate early iron age<br />

societies <strong>of</strong> this region on purely linguistic evidence. In the present state <strong>of</strong><br />

our knowledge, however, it seems preferable generally to admit the conclusions<br />

<strong>of</strong> historical linguistics as secondary evidence for comparison with<br />

a sequence which has first been established on the basis <strong>of</strong> archaeology.<br />

Regional survey <strong>of</strong> archaeological evidence<br />

Southern Zambia, Angola, Malawi<br />

A regional survey <strong>of</strong> the Zambian early iron age has recently been<br />

undertaken by the present writer; and a number <strong>of</strong> distinct groups have<br />

been recognized primarily on the basis <strong>of</strong> the typology <strong>of</strong> the associated<br />

pottery. 6 Here, we are only concerned with the evidence from the<br />

southern part <strong>of</strong> the country. Two closely related groups may be discerned<br />

in the Copperbelt region and on the Lusaka plateau. The Chondwe group<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Copperbelt is characterized by pottery vessels with thickened or undifferentiated<br />

rims, the most frequent decorative motifs being lines <strong>of</strong><br />

alternately facing triangular impressions forming a chevron design in false<br />

relief and also chardate areas <strong>of</strong> comb-stamping delineated by broad<br />

grooves. The score <strong>of</strong> village sites which have so far yielded pottery <strong>of</strong> this<br />

type are distributed alongside rivers and streams, generally close to the treelines<br />

<strong>of</strong> the dambos which fringe the upper reaches <strong>of</strong> the Kafue headwater<br />

tributaries. Radio-carbon dates for the Chondwe group sites <strong>of</strong><br />

Kangonga and Chondwe cover the sixth to the eleventh centuries <strong>of</strong> our<br />

era, but study <strong>of</strong> pottery typology suggests that certain other sites may be<br />

earlier. Iron and copper working is evident throughout the time range <strong>of</strong><br />

the known sites. However, exploitation <strong>of</strong> the area's copper deposits appears<br />

to have been on a small scale in early iron age times, although it<br />

attracted widespread trade contacts. 7<br />

To the south, centred on the Lusaka plateau, are the early iron age sites<br />

attributed to the Kapwirimbwe group, the pottery <strong>of</strong> which is distinguished<br />

6. D. W. Phillipson, 1968a, pp. 191-211.<br />

7. E. A. C. Mills and N. T. Filmer, pp. 129-45; D. W . Phillipson, 1972a, pp. 93-128.<br />

075

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!