18.05.2016 Views

UNESCO Ancient Civilizations of Africa (Editor G. Mokhtar)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

West <strong>Africa</strong> before the seventh century<br />

grains which are considered, because <strong>of</strong> their size and shape, to represent<br />

a domesticated variety <strong>of</strong> Pennisetum. From Meniet, Pons and Quezel 9<br />

identified two pollen grains belonging to a level dated to about —3600<br />

which may be a cultivated cereal. Hugot 10 suggests that these are wheat.<br />

Other less conclusive evidence for seed-crop cultivation in this area<br />

comes from the rock shelter at Sefar in the Tassili, radio-carbon dated<br />

to about —3100. Paintings in this shelter 11 appear to depict cultivation,<br />

while linguistic evidence suggests a considerable antiquity for sorghum<br />

cultivation in the central Sahara. 12 Apart from occupying rock shelters,<br />

the prehistoric people <strong>of</strong> this region also occupied relatively large permanent<br />

villages or settlements on hillsides and the edges <strong>of</strong> escarpments overlooking<br />

lakes or wadis, 13 and used an industry particularly rich in polished and<br />

flaked axes, grinders and querns, dimple stones, rubbers, pottery and<br />

nondescript flake tools.<br />

It has <strong>of</strong>ten been suggested, with little or no justification, 14 that this<br />

crop complex represents stimulus - diffusion from the Near East via Egypt.<br />

First, the cultural complex associated with the possible seed-crops found<br />

in central Saharan sites is very different from those <strong>of</strong> Egypt and the Near<br />

East. Secondly, the dates for the archaeologically earliest cultivated crops<br />

in Egypt appear to be later at least than those <strong>of</strong> Amekni. Thirdly, the<br />

cultural similarities (e.g. numerous millstones) between the central Saharan<br />

complex and the pre-ceramic complex discovered by Hobler and Hester<br />

(1969) 15 in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the Dungal and Dineigi oases in southwestern<br />

Libya are nowhere near enough to suggest any close relationship.<br />

Unlike the Hoggar complex, the Libyan one is a blade industry and not<br />

a flake industry and contains several sickle-blades, a variety <strong>of</strong> projectiles,<br />

drill-like piercing tools and biface knives. This complex, which dates from<br />

at least —6000 and may go back to as early as —8300, bears more similarity<br />

to the Mesolithic industries <strong>of</strong> north-east <strong>Africa</strong> and the Nubian region<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Nile. Thus although the Libyan complex occurs at the north-eastern<br />

end <strong>of</strong> the large semi-circular plateau running through the central Sahara,<br />

it cannot possibly be the direct precursor <strong>of</strong> the Hoggar 'Neolithic' which<br />

occurs at the south-western end <strong>of</strong> the same plateau. Archaeologists working<br />

in the area might do better to look for the precursor first in the latter<br />

area (i.e. the Hoggar).<br />

9. A. Pons and P. Quezel, pp. 27-35.<br />

10. H. J. Hugot, 1968. p. 485.<br />

11. H. Lhote, 1959, p. 118.<br />

12. G. Camps, 1960b, p. 79.<br />

13. J. P. Maître, 1966, pp. 95-104.<br />

if P. J. Munson, 1972.<br />

15. P. 11. Hobler and J. J. Hester, pp. 120-30.<br />

599

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!