NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports
NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports
NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
20040120946 Clevel<strong>and</strong> State Univ., Clevel<strong>and</strong>, OH, USA<br />
Robust Timing Synchronization in Aeronautical Mobile Communication Systems<br />
Xiong, Fu-Qin; Pinchak, Stanley; September 16, 2004; 56 pp.; In English<br />
Contract(s)/Grant(s): NAG3-2619; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; C01, CD-ROM; A04, Hardcopy<br />
This work details a study of robust synchronization schemes suitable for satellite to mobile aeronautical applications. A<br />
new scheme, the Modified Sliding Window Synchronizer (MSWS), is devised <strong>and</strong> compared with existing schemes, including<br />
the traditional Early-Late Gate Synchronizer (ELGS), the Gardner Zero-Crossing Detector (GZCD), <strong>and</strong> the Sliding Window<br />
Synchronizer (SWS). Performance of the synchronization schemes is evaluated by a set of metrics that indicate performance<br />
in digital communications systems. The metrics are convergence time, mean square phase error (or root mean-square phase<br />
error), lowest SNR for locking, initial frequency offset performance, midstream frequency offset performance, <strong>and</strong> system<br />
complexity. The performance of the synchronizers is evaluated by means of Matlab simulation models. A simulation platform<br />
is devised to model the satellite to mobile aeronautical channel, consisting of a Quadrature Phase Shift Keying modulator, an<br />
additive white Gaussian noise channel, <strong>and</strong> a demodulator front end. Simulation results show that the MSWS provides the<br />
most robust performance at the cost of system complexity. The GZCD provides a good tradeoff between robustness <strong>and</strong> system<br />
complexity for communication systems that require high symbol rates or low overall system costs. The ELGS has a high<br />
system complexity despite its average performance. Overall, the SWS, originally designed for multi-carrier systems, performs<br />
very poorly in single-carrier communications systems. Table 5.1 in Section 5 provides a ranking of each of the synchronization<br />
schemes in terms of the metrics set forth in Section 4.1. Details of comparison are given in Section 5. Based on the results<br />
presented in Table 5, it is safe to say that the most robust synchronization scheme examined in this work is the<br />
high-sample-rate Modified Sliding Window Synchronizer. A close second is its low-sample-rate cousin. The tradeoff between<br />
complexity <strong>and</strong> lowest mean-square phase error determines the rankings of the Gardner Zero-Crossing Detector <strong>and</strong> both<br />
versions of the Early-Late Gate Synchronizer. The least robust models are the high <strong>and</strong> low-sample-rate Sliding Window<br />
Synchronizers. Consequently, the recommended replacement synchronizer for <strong>NASA</strong>’s Advanced Air Transportation<br />
Technologies mobile aeronautical communications system is the high-sample-rate Modified Sliding Window Synchronizer. By<br />
incorporating this synchronizer into their system, <strong>NASA</strong> can be assured that their system will be operational in extremely<br />
adverse conditions. The quick convergence time of the MSWS should allow the use of high-level protocols. However, if<br />
<strong>NASA</strong> feels that reduced system complexity is the most important aspect of their replacement synchronizer, the Gardner<br />
Zero-Crossing Detector would be the best choice.<br />
Author<br />
Time Measurement; Mobile Communication Systems; Aircraft Communication; Synchronizers; Phase Detectors;<br />
Telecommunication<br />
20040121012 Defence Science <strong>and</strong> Technology Organisation, Edinburgh, Australia<br />
Range Extension Techniques Available to the Army Tactical Communications System<br />
Blair, W. D.; Dickinson, R. E.; August 2004; 31 pp.; In English; Original contains color illustrations<br />
Report No.(s): DSTO-TN-0573; DODA-AR-013-157; Copyright; Avail: Other Sources<br />
The adoption of the Network Centric Warfare (NCW) philosophy for L<strong>and</strong> Force operations means that connectivity<br />
through networked communications, typically wireless for mobile operations, is of critical importance. The communications<br />
range of the radio equipment becomes a constraint in operational concepts <strong>and</strong> the degree of implementation of NCW. To<br />
overcome this range limitation a series of communications techniques covered by the broad title of range extension techniques<br />
enable nodes to communicate within the battlespace through intermediary devices or phenomena. This paper seeks to identify<br />
<strong>and</strong> discuss the broad spectrum of tactical communications network range extension approaches <strong>and</strong> technologies available.<br />
As a result Army will be better informed in the development of communications architectures for deployed L<strong>and</strong> Force<br />
communications.<br />
Author<br />
Communication Networks; Radio Equipment; Warfare<br />
20040121071 <strong>NASA</strong> Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA<br />
Signal Processing Schemes for Doppler Global Velocimetry<br />
Meyers, James F.; Lee, Joseph W.; Cavone, Angelo A.; [1991]; 20 pp.; In English; 14th International Congress on<br />
Instrumentation in <strong>Aerospace</strong> Simulation Facilities, 27-31 Oct. 1991, Rockville, MD, USA; Original contains color<br />
illustrations; Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />
Two schemes for processing signals obtained from the Doppler global velocimeter are described. The analog approach<br />
is a simple, real time method for obtaining an RS-170 video signal containing the normalized intensity image. Pseudo colors<br />
97