11.12.2012 Views

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

show too that the Maxwell Boltzmann distribution for the electron is not adapted to model the current flow between spacecraft<br />

<strong>and</strong> GEO ambient plasma. In a second part, we will present the plasma contactor principle <strong>and</strong> the physical mechanisms which<br />

generates charges exchange between spacecraft <strong>and</strong> ambient plasma. We will show that we can compare the physical<br />

mechanisms of the expansion of high-density plasma (the plasma generated by the thruster) into another plasma (the GEO<br />

ambient plasma) with the mechanism appearing in a PN junction. The region of high-density plasma is similar to the N region<br />

(electrons majority) of the junction <strong>and</strong> the region of low density is similar to the P region (electron minority). So, with this<br />

analogy we can underst<strong>and</strong> how a current flow can circulate between the spacecraft <strong>and</strong> the ambient plasma through the plasma<br />

of the thruster. Finally, we will present a model for electrons to take account of this current flow <strong>and</strong> its impact on spacecraft<br />

charging.<br />

Author<br />

Plasmas (Physics); Spacecraft Charging; Electrostatics; Mathematical Models; Thrustors<br />

20040111098 Science Applications International Corp., San Diego, CA, USA<br />

Representation of the Geosynchronous Plasma Environment for Spacecraft Charging Calculations<br />

Davis, V. A.; M<strong>and</strong>ell, M. J.; Thomsen, M. F.; 8th Spacecraft Charging Technology Conference; March 2004; 9 pp.; In<br />

Afrikaans; See also 20040111031; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A02, Hardcopy<br />

Historically, our ability to predict <strong>and</strong> postdict surface charging has suffered from both a lack of reliable secondary<br />

emission <strong>and</strong> backscattered electron yields <strong>and</strong> poor characterization of the plasma environment. One difficulty lies in the<br />

common practice of fitting the plasma data to a Maxwellian or Double Maxwellian distribution function, which may not<br />

represent the data well for charging purposes. For 13 years Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) has been accumulating<br />

measurements of electron <strong>and</strong> proton spectra from Magnetospheric Plasma Analyzer (MPA) instruments aboard a series of<br />

geosynchronous satellites. These data provide both a plasma characterization <strong>and</strong> the potential of the instrument ground. We<br />

use electron <strong>and</strong> ion flux spectra measured by the LANL MPA to examine how the use of different spectral representations<br />

of the charged particle environment in computations of spacecraft potentials during magnetospheric substorms affects the<br />

accuracy of the results. We calculate the spacecraft potential using both the measured fluxes <strong>and</strong> several different fits to these<br />

fluxes. These flux measurements <strong>and</strong> fits have been corrected for the difference between the measured <strong>and</strong> calculated potential.<br />

The potentials computed using the measured fluxes, the best available material properties of graphite carbon, <strong>and</strong> a secondary<br />

electron escape fraction of 81%, are within a factor of three of the measured potential for nearly all the data. Using a Kappa<br />

fit to the electron distribution function <strong>and</strong> a Maxwellian fit to the ion distribution function gives agreement similar to the<br />

calculations using the actual data. Alternative spectral representations, including Maxwellian <strong>and</strong> double Maxwellian for both<br />

species, lead to less satisfactory agreement between predicted <strong>and</strong> measured potentials.<br />

Author<br />

Spacecraft Charging; Geosynchronous Orbits; Earth Orbital Environments; Space Plasmas<br />

20040111099 Moscow State Univ., Russia<br />

Computer Simulation of Radiation Charging Processes in Spacecraft Materials<br />

Mileev, Valery; Novikov, L. S.; 8th Spacecraft Charging Technology Conference; March 2004; 6 pp.; In English; See also<br />

20040111031; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A02, Hardcopy<br />

The problems of application of Monte-Carlo method to modeling of processes of internal charging of spacecrafts<br />

dielectric materials of under impact of electrons with energies 0.1 - 10 MeV, appropriate to range of energy spectrums of the<br />

Earth radiation belts electrons are considered. The dynamic model of internal charging including self-consistent calculation<br />

of internal electrical field <strong>and</strong> its influence to motion of primary <strong>and</strong> secondary charged particles is shown. In terms of the<br />

simulation results, the differences between processes of internal charging of dielectrics in space conditions <strong>and</strong> in laboratory<br />

experiments in electron accelerators are explained.<br />

Author<br />

Monte Carlo Method; Dielectrics; Charged Particles; Radiation Belts; Dynamic Models<br />

20040111103 <strong>NASA</strong> Glenn Research Center, Clevel<strong>and</strong>, OH, USA<br />

On-Orbit Daytime Solar Heating Effects: A Comparison of Ground Chamber Arcing Results<br />

Galofaro, J.; Vayner, B.; Ferguson, D.; 8th Spacecraft Charging Technology Conference; March 2004; 9 pp.; In English; See<br />

also 20040111031; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A02, Hardcopy<br />

The purpose of the current experiment is to make direct comparisons between the arcing results obtained from the<br />

diffusion pumped vertical chamber <strong>and</strong> our newly renovated Teney vacuum chamber which is equipped with a cryogenic<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!