NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports
NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports
NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
show too that the Maxwell Boltzmann distribution for the electron is not adapted to model the current flow between spacecraft<br />
<strong>and</strong> GEO ambient plasma. In a second part, we will present the plasma contactor principle <strong>and</strong> the physical mechanisms which<br />
generates charges exchange between spacecraft <strong>and</strong> ambient plasma. We will show that we can compare the physical<br />
mechanisms of the expansion of high-density plasma (the plasma generated by the thruster) into another plasma (the GEO<br />
ambient plasma) with the mechanism appearing in a PN junction. The region of high-density plasma is similar to the N region<br />
(electrons majority) of the junction <strong>and</strong> the region of low density is similar to the P region (electron minority). So, with this<br />
analogy we can underst<strong>and</strong> how a current flow can circulate between the spacecraft <strong>and</strong> the ambient plasma through the plasma<br />
of the thruster. Finally, we will present a model for electrons to take account of this current flow <strong>and</strong> its impact on spacecraft<br />
charging.<br />
Author<br />
Plasmas (Physics); Spacecraft Charging; Electrostatics; Mathematical Models; Thrustors<br />
20040111098 Science Applications International Corp., San Diego, CA, USA<br />
Representation of the Geosynchronous Plasma Environment for Spacecraft Charging Calculations<br />
Davis, V. A.; M<strong>and</strong>ell, M. J.; Thomsen, M. F.; 8th Spacecraft Charging Technology Conference; March 2004; 9 pp.; In<br />
Afrikaans; See also 20040111031; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A02, Hardcopy<br />
Historically, our ability to predict <strong>and</strong> postdict surface charging has suffered from both a lack of reliable secondary<br />
emission <strong>and</strong> backscattered electron yields <strong>and</strong> poor characterization of the plasma environment. One difficulty lies in the<br />
common practice of fitting the plasma data to a Maxwellian or Double Maxwellian distribution function, which may not<br />
represent the data well for charging purposes. For 13 years Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) has been accumulating<br />
measurements of electron <strong>and</strong> proton spectra from Magnetospheric Plasma Analyzer (MPA) instruments aboard a series of<br />
geosynchronous satellites. These data provide both a plasma characterization <strong>and</strong> the potential of the instrument ground. We<br />
use electron <strong>and</strong> ion flux spectra measured by the LANL MPA to examine how the use of different spectral representations<br />
of the charged particle environment in computations of spacecraft potentials during magnetospheric substorms affects the<br />
accuracy of the results. We calculate the spacecraft potential using both the measured fluxes <strong>and</strong> several different fits to these<br />
fluxes. These flux measurements <strong>and</strong> fits have been corrected for the difference between the measured <strong>and</strong> calculated potential.<br />
The potentials computed using the measured fluxes, the best available material properties of graphite carbon, <strong>and</strong> a secondary<br />
electron escape fraction of 81%, are within a factor of three of the measured potential for nearly all the data. Using a Kappa<br />
fit to the electron distribution function <strong>and</strong> a Maxwellian fit to the ion distribution function gives agreement similar to the<br />
calculations using the actual data. Alternative spectral representations, including Maxwellian <strong>and</strong> double Maxwellian for both<br />
species, lead to less satisfactory agreement between predicted <strong>and</strong> measured potentials.<br />
Author<br />
Spacecraft Charging; Geosynchronous Orbits; Earth Orbital Environments; Space Plasmas<br />
20040111099 Moscow State Univ., Russia<br />
Computer Simulation of Radiation Charging Processes in Spacecraft Materials<br />
Mileev, Valery; Novikov, L. S.; 8th Spacecraft Charging Technology Conference; March 2004; 6 pp.; In English; See also<br />
20040111031; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A02, Hardcopy<br />
The problems of application of Monte-Carlo method to modeling of processes of internal charging of spacecrafts<br />
dielectric materials of under impact of electrons with energies 0.1 - 10 MeV, appropriate to range of energy spectrums of the<br />
Earth radiation belts electrons are considered. The dynamic model of internal charging including self-consistent calculation<br />
of internal electrical field <strong>and</strong> its influence to motion of primary <strong>and</strong> secondary charged particles is shown. In terms of the<br />
simulation results, the differences between processes of internal charging of dielectrics in space conditions <strong>and</strong> in laboratory<br />
experiments in electron accelerators are explained.<br />
Author<br />
Monte Carlo Method; Dielectrics; Charged Particles; Radiation Belts; Dynamic Models<br />
20040111103 <strong>NASA</strong> Glenn Research Center, Clevel<strong>and</strong>, OH, USA<br />
On-Orbit Daytime Solar Heating Effects: A Comparison of Ground Chamber Arcing Results<br />
Galofaro, J.; Vayner, B.; Ferguson, D.; 8th Spacecraft Charging Technology Conference; March 2004; 9 pp.; In English; See<br />
also 20040111031; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A02, Hardcopy<br />
The purpose of the current experiment is to make direct comparisons between the arcing results obtained from the<br />
diffusion pumped vertical chamber <strong>and</strong> our newly renovated Teney vacuum chamber which is equipped with a cryogenic<br />
38