11.12.2012 Views

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

20040120985 <strong>NASA</strong> Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA<br />

Generic Hypersonic Inlet Module Analysis<br />

Cockrell, Chares E., Jr.; Huebner, Lawrence D.; [2004]; 12 pp.; In English; AIAA 9th Applied Aerodynamics Conference,<br />

24-26 Sep. 1991, Baltimore, MD, USA<br />

Report No.(s): AIAA Paper 91-3209; Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />

A computational study associated with an internal inlet drag analysis was performed for a generic hypersonic inlet<br />

module. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of computing the internal drag force for a generic scramjet<br />

engine module using computational methods. The computational study consisted of obtaining two-dimensional (2D) <strong>and</strong><br />

three-dimensional (3D) computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solutions using the Euler <strong>and</strong> parabolized Navier-Stokes (PNS)<br />

equations. The solution accuracy was assessed by comparisons with experimental pitot pressure data. The CFD analysis<br />

indicates that the 3D PNS solutions show the best agreement with experimental pitot pressure data. The internal inlet drag<br />

analysis consisted of obtaining drag force predictions based on experimental data <strong>and</strong> 3D CFD solutions. A comparative<br />

assessment of each of the drag prediction methods is made <strong>and</strong> the sensitivity of CFD drag values to computational procedures<br />

is documented. The analysis indicates that the CFD drag predictions are highly sensitive to the computational procedure used.<br />

Author<br />

Computational Fluid Dynamics; Computation; Hypersonic Inlets; Intake Systems<br />

08<br />

AIRCRAFT STABILITY AND CONTROL<br />

Includes flight dynamics, aircraft h<strong>and</strong>ling qualities, piloting, flight controls, <strong>and</strong> autopilots. For related information see also 05 Aircraft<br />

Design, Testing <strong>and</strong> Performance <strong>and</strong> 06 Avionics <strong>and</strong> Aircraft Instrumentation.<br />

20040111476 Georgia Inst. of Tech., Atlanta, GA<br />

Neural Network Based Adaptive Control of Uncertain <strong>and</strong> Unknown Nonlinear Systems<br />

Calise, Anthony J.; Mar. 31, 2004; 18 pp.; In English<br />

Contract(s)/Grant(s): F49620-01-1-0024<br />

Report No.(s): AD-A425419; AFRL-SR-AR-TR-04-0416; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />

The objectives of this research effort were to exploit recent advances in neural network (NN) based adaptive control, with<br />

the goal of being able to treat a very general class of nonlinear system, for which the dynamics are not only uncertain, but<br />

may in fact be unknown except for minimal structural information, such as the relative degree of the regulated output<br />

variables. We were particularly interested in designing adaptive control systems that are robust with respect to both parametric<br />

uncertainty <strong>and</strong> unmodeled dynamics. Extensions to decentralized control were also of interest. In addition, we placed a high<br />

priority on transition opportunities in aircraft flight control, control of flows, control of flexible space structures, <strong>and</strong> control<br />

of aeroelastic wings.<br />

DTIC<br />

Adaptive Control; Network Control; Neural Nets; Nonlinear Systems; Uncertain Systems<br />

20040111756 Micro Analysis <strong>and</strong> Design, Boulder, CO<br />

Multisensory Integration for Pilot Spatial orientation (MIPSO)<br />

Small, Ronald L.; Wickens, Christopher D.; Oster, Alla M.; Keller, John W.; French, Jon W.; Mar. 2004; 103 pp.; In English<br />

Contract(s)/Grant(s): F33615-03-M-6360; Proj-3005<br />

Report No.(s): AD-A425966; AFRL-HE-WP-TR-2004-0035; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A06, Hardcopy<br />

Spatial disorientation (SD) is a normal human response to accelerations in flight, <strong>and</strong> has existed since early flight. Its cost<br />

to the US military is over $300 million per year, with comparable costs to US civil aviation. Despite significantly increased<br />

research over the past decade, the rate of accidents caused by SD has not decreased. While the most recent research emphases<br />

have been on underst<strong>and</strong>ing the physiology of SD, the translation of the new knowledge into tools (e.g., training, displays,<br />

automation) that help pilots avoid SD <strong>and</strong> minimize its effects if it does occur, has not occurred. The goals of the research<br />

reported here were to apply multisensory countermeasures to SD based on human sensory models <strong>and</strong> the pilot’s workload.<br />

It is the premise of this Phase I effort that more effective multisensory countermeasures, applied in an intelligent fashion, are<br />

needed <strong>and</strong> possible, <strong>and</strong> that modeling <strong>and</strong> simulation are the most cost effective means to identity <strong>and</strong> test countermeasures<br />

for different aircraft under varying conditions.<br />

DTIC<br />

Attitude (Inclination); Countermeasures; Disorientation; Navigation Aids; Physiology<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!