11.12.2012 Views

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

for the largest term in the series. Since the l950s the improvement in the measurement of the motion of the Earth’s pole have<br />

made its observation a powerful probe of the structure of the Earth.<br />

DTIC<br />

Earth Core; Nutation; Precession; Rigid Structures<br />

20040120981 <strong>NASA</strong> Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA<br />

EOS Aqua AMSR-E Arctic Sea Ice Validation Program: Arctic2003 Aircraft Campaign Flight Report<br />

Cavalieri, D. J.; Markus,T.; September 2003; 44 pp.; In English<br />

Report No.(s): <strong>NASA</strong>/TM-2003-212247; Rept-2003-02602-0; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />

In March 2003 a coordinated Arctic sea ice validation field campaign using the <strong>NASA</strong> Wallops P-3B aircraft was<br />

successfully completed. This campaign was part of the program for validating the Earth Observing System (EOS) Aqua<br />

Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR-E) sea ice products. The AMSR-E, designed <strong>and</strong> built by the Japanese<br />

National Space Development Agency for <strong>NASA</strong>, was launched May 4, 2002 on the EOS Aqua spacecraft. The AMSR-E sea<br />

ice products to be validated include sea ice concentration, sea ice temperature, <strong>and</strong> snow depth on sea ice. This flight report<br />

describes the suite of instruments flown on the P-3, the objectives of each of the seven flights, the Arctic regions overflown,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the coordination among satellite, aircraft, <strong>and</strong> surface-based measurements. Two of the seven aircraft flights were<br />

coordinated with scientists making surface measurements of snow <strong>and</strong> ice properties including sea ice temperature <strong>and</strong> snow<br />

depth on sea ice at a study area near Barrow, AK <strong>and</strong> at a Navy ice camp located in the Beaufort Sea. Two additional flights<br />

were dedicated to making heat <strong>and</strong> moisture flux measurements over the St. Lawrence Isl<strong>and</strong> polynya to support ongoing<br />

air-sea-ice processes studies of Arctic coastal polynyas. The remaining flights covered portions of the Bering Sea ice edge, the<br />

Chukchi Sea, <strong>and</strong> Norton Sound.<br />

Author<br />

Arctic Regions; Air Sea Ice Interactions; Heat Flux; Sea Ice; Snow; Surface Properties<br />

20040121122 <strong>NASA</strong> Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL, USA<br />

Evaluation of the AMSR-E Data Calibration Over L<strong>and</strong><br />

Njoku, E.; Chan, T.; Crosson, W.; Limaye, A.; [2004]; 1 pp.; In English; No Copyright; Avail: Other Sources; Abstract Only<br />

L<strong>and</strong> observations by the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer for the Earth Observing System (AMSR-E),<br />

particularly of soil <strong>and</strong> vegetation moisture changes, have numerous applications in hydrology, ecology <strong>and</strong> climate.<br />

Quantitative retrieval of soil <strong>and</strong> vegetation parameters relies on accurate calibration of the brightness temperature<br />

measurements. Analyses of the spectral <strong>and</strong> polarization characteristics of early versions of the AMSR-E data revealed<br />

significant calibration biases over l<strong>and</strong> at 6.9 GHz. The biases were estimated <strong>and</strong> removed in the current archived version<br />

of the data Radiofrequency interference (RFI) observed at 6.9 GHz is more difficult to quanti@ however. A calibration analysis<br />

of AMSR-E data over l<strong>and</strong> is presented in this paper for a complete annual cycle from June 2002 through September 2003.<br />

The analysis indicates the general high quality of the data for l<strong>and</strong> applications (except for RFI), <strong>and</strong> illustrates seasonal trends<br />

of the data for different l<strong>and</strong> surface types <strong>and</strong> regions.<br />

Author<br />

Microwave Radiometers; L<strong>and</strong>; Scanners; Earth Observing System (EOS); Data Acquisition; Calibrating<br />

20040121126 <strong>NASA</strong> Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL, USA<br />

L<strong>and</strong>cover Based Optimal Deconvolution of PALS L-b<strong>and</strong> Microwave Brightness Temperature<br />

Limaye, Ashutosh S.; Crosson, William L.; Laymon, Charles A.; Njoku, Eni G.; [2004]; 1 pp.; In English; No Copyright;<br />

Avail: Other Sources; Abstract Only<br />

An optimal de-convolution (ODC) technique has been developed to estimate microwave brightness temperatures of<br />

agricultural fields using microwave radiometer observations. The technique is applied to airborne measurements taken by the<br />

Passive <strong>and</strong> Active L <strong>and</strong> S b<strong>and</strong> (PALS) sensor in Iowa during Soil Moisture Experiments in 2002 (SMEX02). Agricultural<br />

fields in the study area were predominantly soybeans <strong>and</strong> corn. The brightness temperatures of corn <strong>and</strong> soybeans were<br />

observed to be significantly different because of large differences in vegetation biomass. PALS observations have significant<br />

over-sampling; observations were made about 100 m apart <strong>and</strong> the sensor footprint extends to about 400 m. Conventionally,<br />

observations of this type are averaged to produce smooth spatial data fields of brightness temperatures. However, the<br />

conventional approach is in contrast to reality in which the brightness temperatures are in fact strongly dependent on<br />

l<strong>and</strong>cover, which is characterized by sharp boundaries. In this study, we mathematically de-convolve the observations into<br />

brightness temperature at the field scale (500-800m) using the sensor antenna response function. The result is more accurate<br />

141

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!