11.12.2012 Views

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

of no penetration as described in Section 3.3. 6) SSMOD_CE.WKS Determines the number <strong>and</strong> maximum size of perforations<br />

expected in an aluminum bumper of a Space Station common module over its orbital lifetime as discussed in Section 3.3.<br />

Derived from text<br />

Ceramics; Composite Materials; Hypervelocity Impact; Impact Tests; Meteoroid Protection; Space Debris; Spacecraft<br />

Shielding; Shock Loads; Orbital Velocity; Velocity Distribution; Spreadsheets<br />

20040112017 <strong>NASA</strong> Glenn Research Center, Clevel<strong>and</strong>, OH, USA<br />

Degradation of Spacecraft Materials<br />

Dever, Joyce; Banks, Bruce; deGroh, Kim; Miller, Sharon; [2004]; 91 pp.; In English<br />

Contract(s)/Grant(s): 22-319-20-E1; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A05, Hardcopy<br />

This chapter includes descriptions of specific space environmental threats to exterior spacecraft materials. The scope will<br />

be confined to effects on exterior spacecraft surfaces, <strong>and</strong> will not, therefore, address environmental effects on interior<br />

spacecraft systems, such as electronics. Space exposure studies <strong>and</strong> laboratory simulations of individual <strong>and</strong> combined space<br />

environemntal threats will be summarized. A significant emphasis is placed on effects of Earth orbit environments, because<br />

the majority of space missions have been flown in Earth orbits which have provided a significant amount of data on materials<br />

effects. Issues associated with interpreting materials degradation results will be discussed, <strong>and</strong> deficiencies of ground testing<br />

will be identified. Recommendations are provided on reducing or preventing space environmental degradation through<br />

appropriate materials selection.<br />

Author (revised)<br />

Degradation; Spacecraft Structures; Earth Orbital Environments<br />

20040112021 <strong>NASA</strong> Glenn Research Center, Clevel<strong>and</strong>, OH, USA<br />

Leo Spacecraft Charging Design Guidelines: A Proposed <strong>NASA</strong> St<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

Hillard, G. B.; Ferguson, D. C.; [2004]; 4 pp.; In English; 42nd AIAA<strong>Aerospace</strong> Sciences Meeting <strong>and</strong> Exhibit, 5-8 Jan. 2004,<br />

Reno, NV, USA<br />

Contract(s)/Grant(s): WBS 319-20-D1; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A01, Hardcopy<br />

Over the past decade, Low Earth Orbiting (LEO) spacecraft have gradually required ever-increasing power levels. As a<br />

rule, this has been accomplished through the use of high voltage systems. Recent failures <strong>and</strong> anomalies on such spacecraft<br />

have been traced to various design practices <strong>and</strong> materials choices related to the high voltage solar arrays. <strong>NASA</strong> Glenn has<br />

studied these anomalies including plasma chamber testing on arrays similar to those that experienced difficulties on orbit.<br />

Many others in the community have been involved in a comprehensive effort to underst<strong>and</strong> the problems <strong>and</strong> to develop<br />

practices to avoid them. The <strong>NASA</strong> Space Environments <strong>and</strong> Effects program, recognizing the timeliness of this effort,<br />

commissioned <strong>and</strong> funded a design guidelines document intended to capture the current state of underst<strong>and</strong>ing. This document,<br />

which was completed in the spring of 2003, has been submitted as a proposed <strong>NASA</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard. We present here an overview<br />

of this document <strong>and</strong> discuss the effort to develop it as a <strong>NASA</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard.<br />

Author<br />

Low Earth Orbits; Spacecraft Charging; St<strong>and</strong>ards; <strong>Aerospace</strong> Vehicles; Spacecraft Design; <strong>NASA</strong> Programs<br />

20040112033 Ohio Univ., Athens, OH, USA<br />

A Flight Control Approach for Small Reentry Vehicles<br />

Bevacqoa, Tim; Adams, Tony; Zhu. J. Jim; Rao, P. Prabhakara; [2004]; 13 pp.; In English; AIAA Guidance, Navigation, <strong>and</strong><br />

Control Conference, 16-19 Aug. 2004, Providence, RI, USA; Original contains black <strong>and</strong> white illustrations<br />

Contract(s)/Grant(s): NAS8-01098; Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />

Flight control of small crew return vehicles during atmospheric reentry will be an important technology in any human<br />

space flight mission undertaken in the future. The control system presented in this paper is applicable to small crew return<br />

vehicles in which reaction control system (RCS) thrusters are the only actuators available for attitude control. The control<br />

system consists of two modules: (i) the attitude controller using the trajectory linearization control (TLC) technique, <strong>and</strong> (ii)<br />

the reaction control system (RCS) control allocation module using a dynamic table-lookup technique. This paper describes the<br />

design <strong>and</strong> implementation of the TLC attitude control <strong>and</strong> the dynamic table-lookup RCS control allocation for nonimal flight<br />

along with design verification test results.<br />

Author<br />

Flight Control; Linearization; Lifting Reentry Vehicles; Spacecraft Configurations; <strong>Aerospace</strong> Planes<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!