11.12.2012 Views

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL<br />

AEROSPACE REPORTS<br />

A Biweekly Publication of the National Aeronautics <strong>and</strong> Space Administration<br />

VOLUME 42, OCTOBER 8, 2004<br />

02<br />

AERODYNAMICS<br />

Includes aerodynamics of flight vehicles, test bodies, airframe components <strong>and</strong> combinations, wings, <strong>and</strong> control surfaces. Also includes<br />

aerodynamics of rotors, stators, fans, <strong>and</strong> other elements of turbomachinery. For related information see also 34 Fluid Mechanics <strong>and</strong><br />

Thermodynamics.<br />

20040111309 <strong>NASA</strong> Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA<br />

Control <strong>and</strong> Identification of Turbulent Boundary Layer Separation<br />

Seifert, Avi; Pack-Melton, La Tunia; [2004]; 11 pp.; In English; International Union of Theoretical <strong>and</strong> Applied Mechanics<br />

2004, 12-14 Aug. 2004, Gottingen, Germany<br />

Contract(s)/Grant(s): 23-719-55-MG; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />

Effective delay of turbulent boundary layer separation could be achieved via closed-loop control. Constructing such a<br />

system requires that sensor data be processed, real-time, <strong>and</strong> fed into the controller to determine the output. Current methods<br />

for detection of turbulent boundary layer separation are lacking the capability of localized, fast <strong>and</strong> reliable identification of<br />

the boundary layer state. A method is proposed for short-time FFT processing of time series, measured by hot-film sensors,<br />

with the purpose of identifying the alternation of the balance between small <strong>and</strong> large scales as the boundary layer separates,<br />

favoring the large scales. The method has been validated by comparison to other criteria of separation detection <strong>and</strong> over a<br />

range of baseline <strong>and</strong> controlled flow conditions on a simplified high-lift system, incorporating active flow control.<br />

Derived from text<br />

Turbulent Boundary Layer; Flow Distribution; Active Control; Boundary Layer Separation; Time Series Analysis<br />

20040111369 North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, USA<br />

Role of Turbulent Pr<strong>and</strong>tl Number on Heat Flux at Hypersonic Mach Number<br />

Xiao, X.; Edwards, J. R.; Hassan, H. A.; [2004]; 5 pp.; In English<br />

Contract(s)/Grant(s): NAG1-03030; Copyright; Avail: CASI; A01, Hardcopy<br />

Present simulation of turbulent flows involving shock wave/boundary layer interaction invariably overestimates heat flux<br />

by almost a factor of two. One possible reason for such a performance is a result of the fact that the turbulence models<br />

employed make use of Morkovin’s hypothesis. This hypothesis is valid for non-hypersonic Mach numbers <strong>and</strong> moderate rates<br />

of heat transfer. At hypersonic Mach numbers, high rates of heat transfer exist in regions where shock wave/boundary layer<br />

interactions are important. As a result, one should not expect traditional turbulence models to yield accurate results. The goal<br />

of this investigation is to explore the role of a variable Pr<strong>and</strong>tl number formulation in predicting heat flux in flows dominated<br />

by strong shock wave/boundary layer interactions. The intended applications involve external flows in the absence of<br />

combustion such as those encountered in supersonic inlets. This can be achieved by adding equations for the temperature<br />

variance <strong>and</strong> its dissipation rate. Such equations can be derived from the exact Navier-Stokes equations. Traditionally, modeled<br />

equations are based on the low speed energy equation where the pressure gradient term <strong>and</strong> the term responsible for energy<br />

dissipation are ignored. It is clear that such assumptions are not valid for hypersonic flows. The approach used here is based<br />

on the procedure used in deriving the k-zeta model, in which the exact equations that governed k, the variance of velocity,<br />

<strong>and</strong> zeta, the variance of vorticity, were derived <strong>and</strong> modeled. For the variable turbulent Pr<strong>and</strong>tl number, the exact equations<br />

that govern the temperature variance <strong>and</strong> its dissipation rate are derived <strong>and</strong> modeled term by term. The resulting set of<br />

equations are free of damping <strong>and</strong> wall functions <strong>and</strong> are coordinate-system independent. Moreover, modeled correlations are<br />

tensorially consistent <strong>and</strong> invariant under Galilean transformation. The final set of equations will be given in the paper.<br />

Author<br />

Pr<strong>and</strong>tl Number; Heat Flux; Hypersonic Speed<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!