11.12.2012 Views

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

20040111963 <strong>NASA</strong> Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA<br />

Classification of Magneto-Optic Images using Neural Networks<br />

Nath, Shridhar; Wincheski, Buzz; Fulton, Jim; Namkung, Min; [1994]; 3 pp.; In English; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A01,<br />

Hardcopy<br />

A real time imaging system with a neural network classifier has been incorporated on a Macintosh computer in<br />

conjunction with an MOI system. This system images rivets on aircraft aluminium structures using eddy currents <strong>and</strong> magnetic<br />

imaging. Moment invariant functions from the image of a rivet is used to train a multilayer perceptron neural network to<br />

classify the rivets as good or bad (rivets with cracks).<br />

Author<br />

Image Classification; Imaging Techniques; Magneto-Optics; Neural Nets; Aircraft Structures<br />

20040120900 ATK-Thiokol Propulsion, Brigham City, UT, USA<br />

Identifying, Assessing, <strong>and</strong> Mitigating Risk of Single-Point Inspections on the Space Shuttle Reusable Solid Rocket<br />

Motor<br />

Greenhalgh, Phillip O.; [2004]; 7 pp.; In English; 22nd International System Safety Conference, 2-6 Aug. 2004, Providence,<br />

RI, USA; Original contains color illustrations<br />

Contract(s)/Grant(s): NAS8-97238; Copyright; Avail: CASI; A02, Hardcopy<br />

In the production of each Space Shuttle Reusable Solid Rocket Motor (RSRM), over 100,000 inspections are performed.<br />

ATK Thiokol Inc. reviewed these inspections to ensure a robust inspection system is maintained. The principal effort within<br />

this endeavor was the systematic identification <strong>and</strong> evaluation of inspections considered to be single-point. Single-point<br />

inspections are those accomplished on components, materials, <strong>and</strong> tooling by only one person, involving no other check. The<br />

purpose was to more accurately characterize risk <strong>and</strong> ultimately address <strong>and</strong>/or mitigate risk associated with single-point<br />

inspections. After the initial review of all inspections <strong>and</strong> identification/assessment of single-point inspections, review teams<br />

applied risk prioritization methodology similar to that used in a Process Failure Modes Effects Analysis to derive a Risk<br />

Prioritization Number for each single-point inspection. After the prioritization of risk, all single-point inspection points<br />

determined to have significant risk were provided either with risk-mitigating actions or rationale for acceptance. This effort<br />

gave confidence to the RSRM program that the correct inspections are being accomplished, that there is appropriate<br />

justification for those that remain as single-point inspections, <strong>and</strong> that risk mitigation was applied to further reduce risk of<br />

higher risk single-point inspections. This paper examines the process, results, <strong>and</strong> lessons learned in identifying, assessing, <strong>and</strong><br />

mitigating risk associated with single-point inspections accomplished in the production of the Space Shuttle RSRM.<br />

Author<br />

Identifying; Inspection; Reusable Rocket Engines; Space Shuttle Boosters; Risk<br />

20040120973 <strong>NASA</strong> Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA<br />

Issues on Reproducibility/Reliability of Magnetic NDE Methods<br />

Namkung, M.; Fulton, J. P.; Wincheski, B.; Nath, S.; [1994]; 8 pp.; In English; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A02, Hardcopy<br />

One of the critical elements related to the practicality of any NDE technique is its reproducibility under nominally the<br />

same inspection conditions. The results of certain test methodologies, however, are not always repeatable <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

the origin of the irreproducibility is often as critical as obtaining reproducible results. One example is the characterization of<br />

residual stress in structural ferromagnets using the magnetoacoustic (MAC) method. Although it has not been widely<br />

publicized, the test results of this method are known to be time-dependent. Two distinct types of time dependencies have been<br />

observed during testing. The first type has a clearly definable relaxation time, while no such trend has been observed for the<br />

second. The purpose of the present study is to systematically investigate the time dependence of the second type, to find out<br />

the range <strong>and</strong>, if possible, the origin of the variation in the test results. For this, MAC curves were obtained under various stress<br />

levels <strong>and</strong> the tests were repeated over time. Particular attention was given to whether noise in the measuring device or a<br />

change in the laboratory environment could have been a contributing factor. The steel samples used for the study were cut from<br />

C- <strong>and</strong> U-class railroad wheels. The MAC behavior of these samples was reported previously. Each steel sample was first<br />

machined to be a cylindrical rod of 3.175 cm (1.25 in) in diameter <strong>and</strong> 26.67 cm (10.5 in) in length. The center portion of<br />

the samples were further machined to form a pair of flat <strong>and</strong> parallel surfaces for the launch <strong>and</strong> reflection of the ultrasonic<br />

pulses. Data acquisition involved two major elements; magnetic <strong>and</strong> acoustic measurements. Throughout the experiment the<br />

net magnetic induction, B, was measured by integrating the induction pickup coil output using an integrating fluxmeter. The<br />

acoustic measurements employed the phase-locked technique which will be described in the following.<br />

Derived from text<br />

Nondestructive Tests; Magnetic Measurement; Magnetoacoustics; Stress Measurement<br />

133

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!