11.12.2012 Views

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

20040111432 <strong>NASA</strong> Glenn Research Center, Clevel<strong>and</strong>, OH, USA<br />

Power Management <strong>and</strong> Distribution Trades Studies for a Deep-Space Mission <strong>Scientific</strong> Spacecraft<br />

Kimnach, Greg L.; Soltis, James V.; January 1, 2004; 9 pp.; In English; STAIF 2004, 8-12 Feb. 2004, Albuquerque, NM, USA<br />

Contract(s)/Grant(s): 22-982-10-03<br />

Report No.(s): Paper-70; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A02, Hardcopy<br />

As part of <strong>NASA</strong>’s Project Prometheus, the Nuclear Systems Program, <strong>NASA</strong> GRC performed trade studies on the<br />

various Power Management <strong>and</strong> Distribution (PMAD) options for a deep-space scientific spacecraft which would have a<br />

nominal electrical power requirement of 100 kWe. These options included AC (1000Hz <strong>and</strong> 1500Hz <strong>and</strong> DC primary<br />

distribution at various voltages. The distribution system efficiency, reliability, mass, thermal, corona, space radiation levels <strong>and</strong><br />

technology readiness of devices <strong>and</strong> components were considered. The final proposed system consisted of two independent<br />

power distribution channels, sourced by two 3-phase, 110 kVA alternators nominally operating at half-rated power. Each<br />

alternator nominally supplies 50kWe to one half of the ion thrusters <strong>and</strong> science modules but is capable of supplying the total<br />

power re3quirements in the event of loss of one alternator. This paper is an introduction to the methodology for the trades done<br />

to arrive at the proposed PMAD architecture. Any opinions expressed are those of the author(s) <strong>and</strong> do not necessarily reflect<br />

the views of Project Prometheus.<br />

Author<br />

Ion Engines; Power Effıciency; Spacecraft Power Supplies; Technology Assessment; Deep Space; Power Conditioning<br />

20040111982 <strong>NASA</strong> Glenn Research Center, Clevel<strong>and</strong>, OH, USA<br />

System Mass Variation <strong>and</strong> Entropy Generation in 100-kWe Closed-Brayton-Cycle Space Power Systems<br />

Barrett, Michael J.; Reid, Bryan M.; [2004]; 21 pp.; In English; 21st Symposium on Space Nuclear Power <strong>and</strong> Propulsion,<br />

8-12 Feb. 2004, Albuquerque, NM, USA<br />

Contract(s)/Grant(s): WBS 22-973-80-10; Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />

State-of-the-art closed-Brayton-cycle (CBC) space power systems were modeled to study performance trends in a trade<br />

space characteristic of interplanetary orbiters. For working-fluid molar masses of 48.6, 39.9, <strong>and</strong> 11.9 kg/kmol, peak system<br />

pressures of 1.38 <strong>and</strong> 3.0 MPa <strong>and</strong> compressor pressure ratios ranging from 1.6 to 2.4, total system masses were estimated.<br />

System mass increased as peak operating pressure increased for all compressor pressure ratios <strong>and</strong> molar mass values<br />

examined. Minimum mass point comparison between 72 percent He at 1.38 MPa peak <strong>and</strong> 94 percent He at 3.0 MPa peak<br />

showed an increase in system mass of 14 percent. Converter flow loop entropy generation rates were calculated for 1.38 <strong>and</strong><br />

3.0 MPa peak pressure cases. Physical system behavior was approximated using a pedigreed <strong>NASA</strong> Glenn modeling code,<br />

Closed Cycle Engine Program (CCEP), which included realistic performance prediction for heat exchangers, radiators <strong>and</strong><br />

turbomachinery.<br />

Author<br />

Closed Cycles; Brayton Cycle; Spacecraft Power Supplies<br />

20040112040 <strong>NASA</strong> Glenn Research Center, Clevel<strong>and</strong>, OH, USA<br />

Performance Expectations of Closed-Brayton-Cycle Heat Exchangers in 100-kWe Nuclear Space Power Systems<br />

Barrett, Michael J.; [2003]; 21 pp.; In English; 1st International Energy Conversion Engineering Conference (IECEC), 17-21<br />

Aug. 2003, Portsmouth, VA, USA<br />

Contract(s)/Grant(s): WBS 973-80-10<br />

Report No.(s): AIAA Paper 2003-5956; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />

Performance expectations of closed-Brayton-cycle heat exchangers to be used in 100-k We nuclear space power systems<br />

were forecast. Proposed cycle state points for a system supporting a mission to three of Jupiter’s moons required effectiveness<br />

values for the heat-source exchanger, recuperator <strong>and</strong> rejection exchanger (gas cooler) of 0.98, 0.95, <strong>and</strong> 0.97, respectively.<br />

Performance parameters such as number of thermal units (Ntu), equivalent thermal conductance (UA), <strong>and</strong> entropy generation<br />

numbers (Ns) varied from 11 to 19, 23 to 39 kW/K, <strong>and</strong> 0.019 to 0.023 for some st<strong>and</strong>ard heat exchanger configurations.<br />

Pressure-loss contributions to entropy generation were significant; the largest frictional contribution was 114% of the heat<br />

transfer irreversibility. Using conventional recuperator designs, the 0.95 effectiveness proved difficult to achieve without<br />

exceeding other performance targets; a metallic, plate-fin counterflow solution called for 15% more mass <strong>and</strong> 33% higher<br />

pressure-loss than the target values. Two types of gas-coolers showed promise. Single-pass counterflow <strong>and</strong> multipass<br />

cross-counterflow arrangements both met the 0.97 effectiveness requirement. Potential reliability-related advantages of the<br />

cross-counterflow design were noted. Cycle modifications, enhanced heat transfer techniques <strong>and</strong> incorporation of advanced<br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!