11.12.2012 Views

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

weldments [1]. The flaw detection mechanism of the flux focusing electromagnetic probe can help alleviate these difficulties<br />

<strong>and</strong> provide a unique capability for detecting longitudinal fatigue cracks in critical tube structures. The Flux Focusing<br />

Electromagnetic Flaw Detector, originally invented for the detection of fatigue <strong>and</strong> corrosion damage in aluminum plates<br />

[2-3], has been adapted for use in testing steel tubing for longitudinal fatigue cracks. The modified design allows for the probe<br />

to be placed axisymmetrically into the tubing, inducing eddy currents in the tube wall. The pickup coil of the probe is fixed<br />

slightly below the primary windings <strong>and</strong> is rotated 90 so that its axis is normal to the tube wall. The magnetic flux of the<br />

primary coil is focused through the use of ferromagnetic material so that in the absence of fatigue damage there will be no<br />

flux linkage with the pickup coil. The presence of a longitudinal fatigue crack will cause the eddy currents induced in the tube<br />

wall to flow around the flaw <strong>and</strong> directly under the pickup coil. The magnetic field associated with these currents will then<br />

link the pickup coil <strong>and</strong> an unambiguous increase in the output voltage of the probe will be measured. The use of the flux<br />

focusing electromagnetic probe is especially suited for the detection of flaws originating at or near tube welds. The probe is<br />

shown to discriminate against signals due solely to the weld joint so that flaw signals are not hidden in the background in these<br />

locations. Experimental <strong>and</strong> finite element modeling results are presented for the flaw detection capabilities of the probe in<br />

stainless steel tubes.<br />

Derived from text<br />

Winding; Magnetic Fields; Ferromagnetic Materials; Magnetic Flux; Crack Propagation; Fatigue (Materials)<br />

20040112013 <strong>NASA</strong> Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA<br />

Buckling Behavior of Compression-Loaded Composite Cylindrical Shells With Reinforced Cutouts<br />

Hilburger, Mark W.; Sarnes, James H., Jr.; September 2004; 25 pp.; In English; Original contains color illustrations<br />

Contract(s)/Grant(s): 719-20-30<br />

Report No.(s): <strong>NASA</strong>/TM-2004-212656; L-19009; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />

Results from a numerical study of the response of thin-walled compression-loaded quasi-isotropic laminated composite<br />

cylindrical shells with unreinforced <strong>and</strong> reinforced square cutouts are presented. The effects of cutout reinforcement<br />

orthotropy, size, <strong>and</strong> thickness on the nonlinear response of the shells are described. A nonlinear analysis procedure has been<br />

used to predict the nonlinear response of the shells. The results indicate that a local buckling response occurs in the shell near<br />

the cutout when subjected to load <strong>and</strong> is caused by a nonlinear coupling between local shell-wall deformations <strong>and</strong> in-plane<br />

destabilizing compression stresses near the cutout. In general, reinforcement around a cutout in a compression-loaded shell<br />

is shown to retard or eliminate the local buckling response near the cutout <strong>and</strong> increase the buckling load of the shell. However,<br />

some results show that certain reinforcement configurations can cause an unexpected increase in the magnitude of local<br />

deformations <strong>and</strong> stresses in the shell <strong>and</strong> cause a reduction in the buckling load. Specific cases are presented that suggest that<br />

the orthotropy, thickness, <strong>and</strong> size of a cutout reinforcement in a shell can be tailored to achieve improved buckling response<br />

characteristics.<br />

Author<br />

Buckling; Composite Structures; Cylindrical Shells; Reinforcement (Structures); Compression Loads; Openings; Numerical<br />

Analysis<br />

20040112014 <strong>NASA</strong> Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA<br />

Parametric Study on the Response of Compression-Loaded Composite Shells With Geometric <strong>and</strong> Material<br />

Imperfections<br />

Hilburger, Mark W.; Starnes, James H., Jr.; September 2004; 29 pp.; In English<br />

Contract(s)/Grant(s): 719-20-30<br />

Report No.(s): <strong>NASA</strong>/TM-2004-212676; L-19008; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />

The results of a parametric study of the effects of initial imperfections on the buckling <strong>and</strong> postbuckling response of three<br />

unstiffened thinwalled compression-loaded graphite-epoxy cylindrical shells with different orthotropic <strong>and</strong> quasi-isotropic<br />

shell-wall laminates are presented. The imperfections considered include initial geometric shell-wall midsurface<br />

imperfections, shell-wall thickness variations, local shell-wall ply-gaps associated with the fabrication process, shell-end<br />

geometric imperfections, nonuniform applied end loads, <strong>and</strong> variations in the boundary conditions including the effects of<br />

elastic boundary conditions. A high-fidelity nonlinear shell analysis procedure that accurately accounts for the effects of these<br />

imperfections on the nonlinear responses <strong>and</strong> buckling loads of the shells is described. The analysis procedure includes a<br />

nonlinear static analysis that predicts stable response characteristics of the shells <strong>and</strong> a nonlinear transient analysis that predicts<br />

unstable response characteristics.<br />

Author<br />

Shells (Structural Forms); Compression Loads; Parameterization; Cylindrical Shells; Composite Structures; Fabrication<br />

136

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!