11.12.2012 Views

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

20040120889<br />

Alternative Modes as an Air Quality Mitigation Strategy<br />

Schreffler, E. N.; Jun. 2004; 70 pp.; In English<br />

Report No.(s): PB2004-106799; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A04, Hardcopy<br />

Many states, regions, localities <strong>and</strong> private entities promote the use of alternative modes, alternatives to signal occupant<br />

automobile travel, for a variety of reasons. Of interest to this research, many regions <strong>and</strong> states use the promotion of alternative<br />

modes as an air quality strategy. A reduction in the amount <strong>and</strong> timing of automobile travel is often one element of a region’s<br />

air quality strategy. In Arizona, the two largest urban areas, Maricopa <strong>and</strong> Pima Counties, each have travel or trip reduction<br />

programs, aimed at reducing automobile emissions by shifting commuters to alternative modes. The Arizona Department of<br />

Transportation (ADOT) commissioned this research to assess current experience with the use of alternative modes as an air<br />

quality mitigation strategy. This includes investigating what other state departments of transportation (DOTs) are doing to<br />

promote, support, <strong>and</strong> evaluate alternative modes. It is hoped that the information provided here will assist Arizona planners<br />

<strong>and</strong> program managers to inform state policy <strong>and</strong> provide the perspective <strong>and</strong> insights necessary for ADOT personnel to<br />

effectively communicate with their counterparts at the state’s regional <strong>and</strong> local agencies <strong>and</strong> state air quality planners.<br />

NTIS<br />

Air Quality; Cost Effectiveness; Exhaust Emission<br />

20040120890 New Jersey Dept. of Transportation, Trenton, NJ, USA, Rutgers - The State Univ., Piscataway, NJ, USA<br />

Demonstration Project: The Measurement of Pavement Noise on New Jersey Pavements Using the NCAT Noise Trailer<br />

Bennert, T.; Hanson, D.; Maher, A.; May 2004; 34 pp.; In English<br />

Report No.(s): PB2004-106777; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />

A demonstration project was conducted for the New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT) to evaluate the<br />

measurement of pavement/tire noise on New Jersey pavements. The pavement/tire noise is defined as the noise directly<br />

produced by the tire traveling over the pavement surface. It does not consider other traffic-related noise such as<br />

automobile/truck engines, braking, etc. This is important since the only factor the NJDOT can truly control to aid in the traffic<br />

noise reduction is the pavement surface. The demonstration project was developed to provide two key pieces of information:<br />

(1) An evaluation of the NCAT Noise Trailer as a means of measuring pavement/tire related noise, <strong>and</strong> (2) To develop an initial<br />

database of noise values for different pavement surfaces that are typically encountered on New Jersey highways. The NCAT<br />

(National Center for Asphalt Technology) Noise Trailer uses the Close-Proximity Method (CPX) to measure the pavement/tire<br />

noise levels. In this method, microphones are placed near the pavement/tire interface to directly measure the pavement/tire<br />

noise levels. The microphone set-up <strong>and</strong> tires are enclosed in a chamber that is insulated with noise absorbing insulation. This<br />

provides an enclosure that is only measuring the noise developed by the pavement/tire interface <strong>and</strong> not any external noise<br />

of the passing vehicles or environment.<br />

NTIS<br />

Asphalt; Pavements<br />

20040120895 California Univ., Riverside, CA, USA<br />

Measurements of NO(y), Nitric Acid, NO, <strong>and</strong> PAN in the South Coast Air Basin<br />

Fitz, D. R.; May 2004; 72 pp.; In English<br />

Report No.(s): PB2004-106391; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A04, Hardcopy<br />

NO(y)-No(y)(star) analyzers <strong>and</strong> NO2/PAN gas chromatographs were used in the continuation of a study to evaluate the<br />

concentrations of nitrogenous species in Azusa <strong>and</strong> Riverside. These two sites are generally on the same afternoon wind<br />

trajectory with Azusa, approximately 35 miles to the west-northwest, being upwind. NO-NO(y)-NO(y)(star) instruments are<br />

chemiluminescent NO-NO(x) analyzers equipped with dual converters, with one preceded by a NaCl-coated denuder to<br />

measure nitric acid by difference. NO2/PAN gas chromatographs separate NO2 <strong>and</strong> quantify the amount using luminal<br />

detection. This selective method of measuring NO2 <strong>and</strong> PAN is used to quantify the amount of these species contained in the<br />

NO(y). The analyzers were operated from May 2001 through December 2002. Data were compiled, validated, <strong>and</strong> submitted<br />

for all of 2002. Data from 2001 were submitted as invalidated data. In 2002 NO(y) values at Riverside ranged up to 250 ppb,<br />

<strong>and</strong> values at Azusa reached up to 500ppb. The diurnal pattern of nitric acid was observable nearly every day, although at each<br />

site one of the two collocated NO(y)-NO(y)(star) instruments was biased low, most likely due to a slight converter efficiency<br />

mismatch.<br />

NTIS<br />

Nitrogen Dioxide; Nitric Acid; Measurement; Air Quality<br />

151

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!