11.12.2012 Views

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

20040111231 <strong>NASA</strong> Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA<br />

Aerodynamic Performance <strong>and</strong> Flow-Field Characteristics of Two Waverider-Derived Hypersonic Cruise Configurations<br />

Cockrell, Charles E., Jr.; Huebner, Lawrence D.; Finley, Dennis B.; [1995]; 12 pp.; In English; Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03,<br />

Hardcopy<br />

The component integration of a class of hypersonic high-lift configurations known as waveriders into hypersonic cruise<br />

vehicles was evaluated. A wind-tunnel model was developed which integrates realistic vehicle components with two waverider<br />

shapes, referred to as the straight-wing <strong>and</strong> cranked-wing shapes. Both shapes were conical-flow-derived waveriders for a<br />

design Mach number of 4.0. Experimental data <strong>and</strong> limited computational fluid dynamics (CFD) predictions were obtained<br />

over a Mach number range of 1.6 to 4.63 at a Reynolds number of 2.0 x 10(exp 6) per foot. The CFD predictions <strong>and</strong> flow<br />

visualization data confirmed the shock attachment characteristics of the baseline waverider shapes <strong>and</strong> illustrated the<br />

waverider flow-field properties. Experimental data showed that no significant performance degradations, in terms of maximum<br />

lift-to-drag ratios, occur at off-design Mach numbers for the waverider shapes <strong>and</strong> the integrated configurations. A comparison<br />

of the fully-integrated waverider vehicles to the baseline shapes showed that the performance was significantly degraded when<br />

all of the components were added to the waveriders, with the most significant degradation resulting from aftbody closure <strong>and</strong><br />

the addition of control surfaces. Both fully-integrated configurations were longitudinally unstable over the Mach number range<br />

studied with the selected center of gravity location <strong>and</strong> for unpowered conditions. The cranked-wing configuration provided<br />

better lateral-directional stability characteristics than the straight-wing configuration.<br />

Author<br />

Aerodynamic Configurations; Computational Fluid Dynamics; Flow Distribution; Hypersonic Vehicles; Waveriders; Wind<br />

Tunnel Models; Aerodynamic Characteristics<br />

20040111233 <strong>NASA</strong> Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA<br />

Velocity Fields of Axisymmetric Hydrogen-Air Counterflow Diffusion Flames from LDV, PIV, <strong>and</strong> Numerical<br />

Computation<br />

Pellett, Gerald L.; Wilson, Lloyd G.; Humphreys, William M., Jr.; Bartram, Scott M.; Gartrell, Luther R.; Isaac, K. M.; [1995];<br />

24 pp.; In English; AIAA 31st Joint Propulsion Conference, 10-12 Jul. 1995, San Diego, CA, USA<br />

Report No.(s): AIAA Paper 95-3112; Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />

Laminar fuel-air counterflow diffusion flames (CFDFs) were studied using axisymmetric convergent-nozzle <strong>and</strong><br />

straight-tube opposed jet burners (OJBs). The subject diagnostics were used to probe a systematic set of H2/N2-air CFDFs<br />

over wide ranges of fuel input (22 to 100% Ha), <strong>and</strong> input axial strain rate (130 to 1700 Us) just upstream of the airside edge,<br />

for both plug-flow <strong>and</strong> parabolic input velocity profiles. Laser Doppler Velocimetry (LDV) was applied along the centerline<br />

of seeded air flows from a convergent nozzle OJB (7.2 mm i.d.), <strong>and</strong> Particle Imaging Velocimetry (PIV) was applied on the<br />

entire airside of both nozzle <strong>and</strong> tube OJBs (7 <strong>and</strong> 5 mm i.d.) to characterize global velocity structure. Data are compared to<br />

numerical results from a one-dimensional (1-D) CFDF code based on a stream function solution for a potential flow input<br />

boundary condition. Axial strain rate inputs at the airside edge of nozzle-OJB flows, using LDV <strong>and</strong> PIV, were consistent with<br />

1-D impingement theory, <strong>and</strong> supported earlier diagnostic studies. The LDV results also characterized a heat-release hump.<br />

Radial strain rates in the flame substantially exceeded 1-D numerical predictions. Whereas the 1-D model closely predicted<br />

the max I min axial velocity ratio in the hot layer, it overpredicted its thickness. The results also support previously measured<br />

effects of plug-flow <strong>and</strong> parabolic input strain rates on CFDF extinction limits. Finally, the submillimeter-scale LDV <strong>and</strong> PIV<br />

diagnostics were tested under severe conditions, which reinforced their use with subcentimeter OJB tools to assess effects of<br />

aerodynamic strain, <strong>and</strong> fueVair composition, on laminar CFDF properties, including extinction.<br />

Author<br />

Velocity Distribution; Hydrogen; Air Flow; Axial Strain; Counterflow; Diffusion Flames<br />

20040111289 <strong>NASA</strong> Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA<br />

Numerical Simulations of Wake/Boundary Layer Interactions<br />

Piomelli, Ugo; Choudhari, Meelan M.; Ovchinnikov, Victor; Balaras, Elias; [2003]; 13 pp.; In English; 41st <strong>Aerospace</strong><br />

Sciences Meeting <strong>and</strong> Exhibit, 6-9 Jan. 2003, Reno, NV, USA<br />

Contract(s)/Grant(s): NAG1-2285<br />

Report No.(s): AIAA Paper 2003-0975; Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />

Direct <strong>and</strong> large-eddy simulations of the interaction between the wake of a circular cylinder <strong>and</strong> a flat-plate boundary layer<br />

are conducted. Two Reynolds numbers are examined. The simulations indicate that at the lower Reynolds number the<br />

boundary layer is buffeted by the unsteady Karman vortex street shed by the cylinder. The fluctuations, however, cannot be<br />

110

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!