11.12.2012 Views

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

authorized. Additionally, the authors observed injury rate <strong>and</strong> potential injury risk factors. Fifteen infantrymen fired 15 shots<br />

using a weapon system producing 59. 09 ft-lbs of recoil energy. Markers of injury assessed pre- firing, immediately post-firing,<br />

<strong>and</strong> 24, 48, 72 <strong>and</strong> 96 hours post-firing included subjective pain, pain-pressure threshold, bruising, range of motion, strength,<br />

a lifting task, <strong>and</strong> laboratory markers. Thermal imaging <strong>and</strong> MRI were used to assess skin temperature <strong>and</strong> edema. Data were<br />

analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA, Pearson correlations, <strong>and</strong> descriptive statistics. All 15 volunteers exhibited<br />

bruising at the anterior shoulder, <strong>and</strong> 11 reported pain with motion post- firing. Fourteen volunteers (93%) sustained evidence<br />

of soft tissue injury on MRI. Three (20%) sustained facial lacerations. Skin tissue temperature increased immediately<br />

post-firing <strong>and</strong> returned to baseline 24 hours later. Dominant h<strong>and</strong>grip strength had the best predictive value for injury severity<br />

on MRI. The authors conclude that soldiers are at risk for soft tissue contusions <strong>and</strong> lacerations at the upper threshold of<br />

allowable recoil energy. Injury was characterized by elevated skin temperature, pain with motion, <strong>and</strong> decreased pain threshold<br />

immediately post-firing. Signal intensity changes on MRI were consistent with muscle contusion for up to 96 hours post-firing.<br />

(21 tables, 23 figures, 55 refs.)<br />

DTIC<br />

Injuries; Physiological Effects; Shoulders<br />

20040111526 Texas Univ., Houston, TX<br />

Radiation-Induced Chemosensitization: Potentiation of Antitumor Activity of Polymer-Drug Conjugates<br />

Li, Chun; Apr. 2004; 34 pp.; In English<br />

Contract(s)/Grant(s): DAMD17-00-1-0314<br />

Report No.(s): AD-A425533; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />

This study was aimed at evaluating the enhanced antitumor response to radiotherapy by poly(L-glutamic acid)- paclitaxel<br />

(PG-TXL) conjugate. We compared the ability of paclitaxel <strong>and</strong> PG-TXL to sensitize radioresponse using both tumor growth<br />

delay <strong>and</strong> tumor curability as the end points. Furthermore, the effect of treatment schedule on the radiosensitizing activity of<br />

PG-TXL as well as the effect of PG-TXL on the sensitivity of normal tissues to radiation was also studied. Our data<br />

demonstrate significant synergistic interaction between PG-TXL <strong>and</strong> tumor radiation. Compared to paclitaxel, PG-TXL<br />

enhanced the response of tumors to radiation for approximately 4 folds. Importantly, the enhanced antitumor activity was<br />

achieved without apparent effect on the normal tissues. Our results also suggest that PG-TXL may exert its radiosensitizing<br />

effect through multiple mechanisms, one of which being sustained release of paclitaxel in the tumor from PG-TXL. This study<br />

has lead to a National Cancer Institute-sponsored clinical study that has been initiated at the University of Texas M. D.<br />

Anderson Cancer Center.<br />

DTIC<br />

Cancer; Chemotherapy; Conjugates; Conjugation; Drugs; Radiation Therapy<br />

20040111527 Cold Spring Harbor Lab., New York, NY<br />

Cloning of Tumor Suppressor Genes in Breast Cancer<br />

Hamaguchi, Masaaki; May 2004; 17 pp.; In English<br />

Contract(s)/Grant(s): DAMD17-00-1-0206<br />

Report No.(s): AD-A425534; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />

Breast cancer arises through the accumulation of genetic alterations that affect two classes of genes, ongogenes <strong>and</strong> tumor<br />

suppressor genes. These genes must be identified for several reasons. Characterization of the genes that drive carcinogenesis<br />

will facilitate a better underst<strong>and</strong>ing of cancer development. As part of this big picture, we have studied tumor suppressor<br />

genes involved in breast cancer. A tumor suppressor c<strong>and</strong>idate, DBC2 was analyzed. DBC2 is composed of a RAS domain,<br />

protein-protein interacting domains, <strong>and</strong> DNA binding domain. DBC2 expression is extinguished by hypermethylation in more<br />

than half of breast tumors we tested. When DBC2 expression was induced in tumor Cells, the cell growth was expressed.<br />

Additionally, mutants we discovered in breast cancer specimens were found to lack the tumor suppressor function. We are<br />

studying DBC2’s physiological roles by expression microarray analysis, protein- protein interaction studies, <strong>and</strong> functional<br />

analysis. We have identified several genes upregulated by DBC2 <strong>and</strong> potential c<strong>and</strong>idates for interaction. We have also<br />

established techniques to control DBC2 expression, both induction <strong>and</strong> suppression, which will facilitate further analysis of<br />

DBC2.<br />

DTIC<br />

Cancer; Cloning (Biology); Genetic Engineering; Mammary Gl<strong>and</strong>s; Tumor Suppressor Genes<br />

166

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!