NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports
NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports
NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
20040112056 <strong>NASA</strong> Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA<br />
Parametric Cost Analysis: A Design Function<br />
Dean, Edwin B.; [1989]; 12 pp.; In English; Transaction of the American Association of Cost Engineers 33rd Annual Meeting,<br />
25-28 Jun.1989, San Diego, CA, USA; Original contains color illustrations; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />
Parametric cost analysis uses equations to map measurable system attributes into cost. The measures of the system<br />
attributes are called metrics. The equations are called cost estimating relationships (CER’s), <strong>and</strong> are obtained by the analysis<br />
of cost <strong>and</strong> technical metric data of products analogous to those to be estimated. Examples of system metrics include mass,<br />
power, failure_rate, mean_time_to_repair, energy _consumed, payload_to_orbit, pointing_accuracy,<br />
manufacturing_complexity, number_of_fasteners, <strong>and</strong> percent_of_electronics_weight. The basic assumption is that a<br />
measurable relationship exists between system attributes <strong>and</strong> the cost of the system. If a function exists, the attributes are cost<br />
drivers. C<strong>and</strong>idates for metrics include system requirement metrics <strong>and</strong> engineering process metrics. Requirements are<br />
constraints on the engineering process. From optimization theory we know that any active constraint generates cost by not<br />
permitting full optimization of the objective. Thus, requirements are cost drivers. Engineering processes reflect a projection<br />
of the requirements onto the corporate culture, engineering technology, <strong>and</strong> system technology. Engineering processes are an<br />
indirect measure of the requirements <strong>and</strong>, hence, are cost drivers.<br />
Author<br />
Cost Estimates; Functional Analysis; Functions (Mathematics); Costs<br />
20040121015 <strong>NASA</strong> Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL, USA<br />
Analytical Modeling <strong>and</strong> Test Correlation of Variable Density Multilayer Insulation for Cryogenic Storage<br />
Hastings, L. J.; Hedayat, A.; Brown, T. M.; May 2004; 46 pp.; In English<br />
Report No.(s): <strong>NASA</strong>/TM-2004-213175; M-1109; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />
A unique foam/multilayer insulation (MLI) combination concept for orbital cryogenic storage was experimentally<br />
evaluated using a large-scale hydrogen tank. The foam substrate insulates for ground-hold periods <strong>and</strong> enables a gaseous<br />
nitrogen purge as opposed to helium. The MLI, designed for an on-orbit storage period for 45 days, includes several unique<br />
features including a variable layer density <strong>and</strong> larger but fewer perforations for venting during ascent to orbit. Test results with<br />
liquid hydrogen indicated that the MLI weight or tank heat leak is reduced by about half in comparison with st<strong>and</strong>ard MLI.<br />
The focus of this effort is on analytical modeling of the variable density MLI (VD-MLI) on-orbit performance. The<br />
foam/VD-MLI model is considered to have five segments. The first segment represents the optional foam layer. The second,<br />
third, <strong>and</strong> fourth segments represent three different MLI layer densities. The last segment is an environmental boundary or<br />
shroud that surrounds the last MLI layer. Two approaches are considered: a variable density MLI modeled layer by layer <strong>and</strong><br />
a semiempirical model or ‘modified Lockheed equation.’ Results from the two models were very comparable <strong>and</strong> were within<br />
5-8 percent of the measured data at the 300 K boundary condition.<br />
Author<br />
Mathematical Models; Cryogenic Equipment; Multilayer Insulation<br />
20040121065 <strong>NASA</strong> Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA<br />
The Design-To-Cost Manifold<br />
Dean, Edwin B.; [1990]; 13 pp.; In English; International Academy of Astronautics Symposium on Space Systems Cost<br />
Methodologies <strong>and</strong> Applications, 10-11 May 1990, San Diego, CA, USA; Original contains black <strong>and</strong> white illustrations; No<br />
Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />
Design-to-cost is a popular technique for controlling costs. Although qualitative techniques exist for implementing design<br />
to cost, quantitative methods are sparse. In the launch vehicle <strong>and</strong> spacecraft engineering process, the question whether to<br />
minimize mass is usually an issue. The lack of quantification in this issue leads to arguments on both sides. This paper presents<br />
a mathematical technique which both quantifies the design-to-cost process <strong>and</strong> the mass/complexity issue. Parametric cost<br />
analysis generates <strong>and</strong> applies mathematical formulas called cost estimating relationships. In their most common forms, they<br />
are continuous <strong>and</strong> differentiable. This property permits the application of the mathematics of differentiable manifolds.<br />
Although the terminology sounds formidable, the application of the techniques requires only a knowledge of linear algebra<br />
<strong>and</strong> ordinary differential equations, common subjects in undergraduate scientific <strong>and</strong> engineering curricula. When the cost c<br />
is expressed as a differentiable function of n system metrics, setting the cost c to be a constant generates an n-1 dimensional<br />
subspace of the space of system metrics such that any set of metric values in that space satisfies the constant design-to-cost<br />
criterion. This space is a differentiable manifold upon which all mathematical properties of a differentiable manifold may be<br />
applied. One important property is that an easily implemented system of ordinary differential equations exists which permits<br />
optimization of any function of the system metrics, mass for example, over the design-to-cost manifold. A dual set of equations<br />
265