11.12.2012 Views

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

NASA Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

20040112056 <strong>NASA</strong> Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA<br />

Parametric Cost Analysis: A Design Function<br />

Dean, Edwin B.; [1989]; 12 pp.; In English; Transaction of the American Association of Cost Engineers 33rd Annual Meeting,<br />

25-28 Jun.1989, San Diego, CA, USA; Original contains color illustrations; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />

Parametric cost analysis uses equations to map measurable system attributes into cost. The measures of the system<br />

attributes are called metrics. The equations are called cost estimating relationships (CER’s), <strong>and</strong> are obtained by the analysis<br />

of cost <strong>and</strong> technical metric data of products analogous to those to be estimated. Examples of system metrics include mass,<br />

power, failure_rate, mean_time_to_repair, energy _consumed, payload_to_orbit, pointing_accuracy,<br />

manufacturing_complexity, number_of_fasteners, <strong>and</strong> percent_of_electronics_weight. The basic assumption is that a<br />

measurable relationship exists between system attributes <strong>and</strong> the cost of the system. If a function exists, the attributes are cost<br />

drivers. C<strong>and</strong>idates for metrics include system requirement metrics <strong>and</strong> engineering process metrics. Requirements are<br />

constraints on the engineering process. From optimization theory we know that any active constraint generates cost by not<br />

permitting full optimization of the objective. Thus, requirements are cost drivers. Engineering processes reflect a projection<br />

of the requirements onto the corporate culture, engineering technology, <strong>and</strong> system technology. Engineering processes are an<br />

indirect measure of the requirements <strong>and</strong>, hence, are cost drivers.<br />

Author<br />

Cost Estimates; Functional Analysis; Functions (Mathematics); Costs<br />

20040121015 <strong>NASA</strong> Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL, USA<br />

Analytical Modeling <strong>and</strong> Test Correlation of Variable Density Multilayer Insulation for Cryogenic Storage<br />

Hastings, L. J.; Hedayat, A.; Brown, T. M.; May 2004; 46 pp.; In English<br />

Report No.(s): <strong>NASA</strong>/TM-2004-213175; M-1109; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />

A unique foam/multilayer insulation (MLI) combination concept for orbital cryogenic storage was experimentally<br />

evaluated using a large-scale hydrogen tank. The foam substrate insulates for ground-hold periods <strong>and</strong> enables a gaseous<br />

nitrogen purge as opposed to helium. The MLI, designed for an on-orbit storage period for 45 days, includes several unique<br />

features including a variable layer density <strong>and</strong> larger but fewer perforations for venting during ascent to orbit. Test results with<br />

liquid hydrogen indicated that the MLI weight or tank heat leak is reduced by about half in comparison with st<strong>and</strong>ard MLI.<br />

The focus of this effort is on analytical modeling of the variable density MLI (VD-MLI) on-orbit performance. The<br />

foam/VD-MLI model is considered to have five segments. The first segment represents the optional foam layer. The second,<br />

third, <strong>and</strong> fourth segments represent three different MLI layer densities. The last segment is an environmental boundary or<br />

shroud that surrounds the last MLI layer. Two approaches are considered: a variable density MLI modeled layer by layer <strong>and</strong><br />

a semiempirical model or ‘modified Lockheed equation.’ Results from the two models were very comparable <strong>and</strong> were within<br />

5-8 percent of the measured data at the 300 K boundary condition.<br />

Author<br />

Mathematical Models; Cryogenic Equipment; Multilayer Insulation<br />

20040121065 <strong>NASA</strong> Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA<br />

The Design-To-Cost Manifold<br />

Dean, Edwin B.; [1990]; 13 pp.; In English; International Academy of Astronautics Symposium on Space Systems Cost<br />

Methodologies <strong>and</strong> Applications, 10-11 May 1990, San Diego, CA, USA; Original contains black <strong>and</strong> white illustrations; No<br />

Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />

Design-to-cost is a popular technique for controlling costs. Although qualitative techniques exist for implementing design<br />

to cost, quantitative methods are sparse. In the launch vehicle <strong>and</strong> spacecraft engineering process, the question whether to<br />

minimize mass is usually an issue. The lack of quantification in this issue leads to arguments on both sides. This paper presents<br />

a mathematical technique which both quantifies the design-to-cost process <strong>and</strong> the mass/complexity issue. Parametric cost<br />

analysis generates <strong>and</strong> applies mathematical formulas called cost estimating relationships. In their most common forms, they<br />

are continuous <strong>and</strong> differentiable. This property permits the application of the mathematics of differentiable manifolds.<br />

Although the terminology sounds formidable, the application of the techniques requires only a knowledge of linear algebra<br />

<strong>and</strong> ordinary differential equations, common subjects in undergraduate scientific <strong>and</strong> engineering curricula. When the cost c<br />

is expressed as a differentiable function of n system metrics, setting the cost c to be a constant generates an n-1 dimensional<br />

subspace of the space of system metrics such that any set of metric values in that space satisfies the constant design-to-cost<br />

criterion. This space is a differentiable manifold upon which all mathematical properties of a differentiable manifold may be<br />

applied. One important property is that an easily implemented system of ordinary differential equations exists which permits<br />

optimization of any function of the system metrics, mass for example, over the design-to-cost manifold. A dual set of equations<br />

265

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!