06.09.2021 Views

Critical Expressivism- Theory and Practice in the Composition Classroom, 2014a

Critical Expressivism- Theory and Practice in the Composition Classroom, 2014a

Critical Expressivism- Theory and Practice in the Composition Classroom, 2014a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Communication as Social Action<br />

toward that. These are core personal beliefs I br<strong>in</strong>g with me to <strong>the</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g of this<br />

chapter, to <strong>the</strong> conversation.<br />

STORY OF US<br />

“Our stories of self overlap with our stories of us …. A story of us expresses<br />

<strong>the</strong> values, <strong>the</strong> experiences, shared by <strong>the</strong> us we hope to evoke at <strong>the</strong> time”<br />

(Ganz, 2008, p. 12). The “us” be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>voked <strong>in</strong> this collection is <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>d of<br />

teacher I want to be—<strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>d of compassionate, critical, th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g, reflective<br />

teacher (person) I want to be. It is an “us” I want to use to help shape my story<br />

of self because we are collectively construct<strong>in</strong>g a community of values <strong>and</strong><br />

experiences that help our students, communities, <strong>and</strong> worlds. The “collective<br />

identity” be<strong>in</strong>g constructed here across <strong>the</strong> articles is one I wish to be a part of.<br />

The overlap of my story with this collective “us.”<br />

“Like <strong>the</strong> story of self, [<strong>the</strong> story of us] is built from <strong>the</strong> choices po<strong>in</strong>ts—<br />

<strong>the</strong> found<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> choices made, <strong>the</strong> challenges faced, <strong>the</strong> outcomes, <strong>the</strong> lessons<br />

learned” (Ganz, 2008, p. 12). I see this book as a story of us, cover<strong>in</strong>g all of <strong>the</strong>se<br />

ideas (explicitly or implicitly)—beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>gs, ongo<strong>in</strong>g choices, perpetually chang<strong>in</strong>g<br />

outcomes, ever blossom<strong>in</strong>g lessons. It is a story <strong>in</strong> which I feel welcomed, not<br />

isolated. It is a story <strong>in</strong> which teach<strong>in</strong>g is valued.<br />

Ganz says <strong>the</strong> story of us requires one key storyteller, “an <strong>in</strong>terpreter of experience”<br />

(2008, p. 12), but I suggest that we are all storytellers. We are all serv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

a critical leadership function <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpret<strong>in</strong>g “<strong>the</strong> movement’s new experience”<br />

(Ganz, 2008, p. 12). That is a central part of this book’s story seen through <strong>the</strong><br />

emails we’ve shared, <strong>the</strong> engagements across articles, <strong>the</strong> nature of <strong>the</strong> “collective”<br />

part of <strong>the</strong> edited “collection.”<br />

STORY OF NOW<br />

This is <strong>the</strong> hardest of <strong>the</strong> three stories: “A story of now articulates an urgent<br />

challenge—or threat—to <strong>the</strong> values that we share that dem<strong>and</strong>s action now.<br />

What choices must we make? What is at risk? And where’s <strong>the</strong> hope?” (Ganz,<br />

2008, p. 13).<br />

While I do not th<strong>in</strong>k one writ<strong>in</strong>g class can change <strong>the</strong> world, I do believe that<br />

one writ<strong>in</strong>g class can help students become stronger language users <strong>and</strong> can learn<br />

that language can be an important part of social action. Words have impact;<br />

words can make th<strong>in</strong>gs happen; words do th<strong>in</strong>gs; words are action. Students can/<br />

should take responsibility for <strong>the</strong>ir words. Students can/should be responsive to<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir audiences. Instead of see<strong>in</strong>g writ<strong>in</strong>g assignments as, well, assignments, <strong>the</strong>y<br />

should/can see <strong>the</strong>m as actions that matter—as tasks that matter.<br />

119

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!