06.09.2021 Views

Critical Expressivism- Theory and Practice in the Composition Classroom, 2014a

Critical Expressivism- Theory and Practice in the Composition Classroom, 2014a

Critical Expressivism- Theory and Practice in the Composition Classroom, 2014a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Selfhood <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Personal Essay<br />

A commonplace, perhaps, but a profoundly functional one.<br />

Taylor’s argument is supported by a l<strong>in</strong>e of research on “explanatory style”<br />

conducted by Mart<strong>in</strong> Seligman <strong>and</strong> his colleagues. Explanatory style refers to<br />

<strong>the</strong> ways <strong>in</strong> which <strong>in</strong>dividuals account for <strong>the</strong> difficulties <strong>the</strong>y face; for example<br />

whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y see <strong>the</strong>mselves as victims or agents, whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y posit <strong>the</strong> cause as<br />

a pervasive personality flaw, <strong>and</strong> what k<strong>in</strong>d of flaw. In effect, Seligman is look<strong>in</strong>g<br />

at narrative patterns which have relevance for <strong>the</strong> ways students write about<br />

trauma <strong>and</strong> difficulty. He identifies three crucial dimensions of explanatory style:<br />

Stability. Causes can be accounted for as stable <strong>in</strong> time (<strong>and</strong><br />

thus likely to reoccur <strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>itely) or <strong>the</strong>y may be temporary<br />

<strong>and</strong> remediable.<br />

Range. Causes may be perceived as a global trait of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

(“I’m stupid,” “I’m not a people person.”). Or <strong>the</strong>y<br />

may relate to a specific, local, <strong>and</strong> limited k<strong>in</strong>d of problem or<br />

situation.<br />

Locus. Causes can be seen as <strong>in</strong>ternal or external—as aris<strong>in</strong>g<br />

from purely <strong>in</strong>dividual failures or flaws <strong>in</strong> judgment or<br />

personal weakness, or as aris<strong>in</strong>g, at least partially, from outside<br />

circumstances.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Seligman a great deal rides on <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>d of explanatory style an<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual comes to adopt. The condition he has called “learned helplessness” is<br />

characterized by a particular pattern where people “expla<strong>in</strong> bad events by <strong>in</strong>ternal,<br />

stable, <strong>and</strong> global causes <strong>and</strong> expla<strong>in</strong> good events as external, <strong>in</strong>stable, <strong>and</strong><br />

local” (Seligman, 1988, p. 92). Success is <strong>the</strong> unstable result of luck; failure is<br />

<strong>the</strong> product of character. Marv<strong>in</strong> M<strong>in</strong>sky captured <strong>the</strong> spirit of this argument<br />

as follows:<br />

Th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g is a process, <strong>and</strong> if your th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g does someth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

you don’t want it to you should be able to say someth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

microscopic <strong>and</strong> analytic about it, <strong>and</strong> not someth<strong>in</strong>g envelop<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>and</strong> evaluat<strong>in</strong>g about yourself as a learner. The important<br />

th<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g your thought is to try to depersonalize<br />

your <strong>in</strong>terior; it may be all right to deal with o<strong>the</strong>r people <strong>in</strong><br />

a vague global way, but it is devastat<strong>in</strong>g if this is <strong>the</strong> way you<br />

deal with yourself. (as quoted <strong>in</strong> Bernste<strong>in</strong>, 1981, p. 122)<br />

Seligman’s research identifies <strong>the</strong> devastation M<strong>in</strong>sky refers to, <strong>the</strong> profound<br />

consequences—for physical <strong>and</strong> mental health—of <strong>the</strong> explanatory style associated<br />

with learned helplessness. In addition to a longst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g association with<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!