06.09.2021 Views

Critical Expressivism- Theory and Practice in the Composition Classroom, 2014a

Critical Expressivism- Theory and Practice in the Composition Classroom, 2014a

Critical Expressivism- Theory and Practice in the Composition Classroom, 2014a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

John Watson Is to Introspectionism as James Berl<strong>in</strong> Is to <strong>Expressivism</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>me seems to have been written from one layer of <strong>the</strong><br />

self—<strong>the</strong> ectoderm only, with student <strong>in</strong>volvement with his<br />

own thought <strong>and</strong> language mov<strong>in</strong>g down an unhappy scale<br />

from sporadic engagement to abject diffidence. (Emig, 1983,<br />

p. 46)<br />

Emig quickly drops <strong>the</strong> sk<strong>in</strong> analogy—we hear noth<strong>in</strong>g fur<strong>the</strong>r about <strong>the</strong> ectoderm<br />

or endoderm—but <strong>in</strong> this l<strong>in</strong>e, she vividly plants <strong>the</strong> idea of <strong>the</strong> layered<br />

self, some of <strong>the</strong> layers exposed on <strong>the</strong> surface, <strong>and</strong> some submerged underneath.<br />

It was a small leap to Freud’s concept of <strong>the</strong> conscious <strong>and</strong> unconscious self, <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> related (though not strictly <strong>in</strong>terchangeable) constructs: <strong>the</strong> id, ego, <strong>and</strong><br />

super-ego.<br />

Freud never viewed <strong>the</strong> conscious or unconscious as hav<strong>in</strong>g different locations<br />

with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> body <strong>in</strong> any literal sense. But popular imag<strong>in</strong>ation did. Even<br />

now we talk of “uncover<strong>in</strong>g” our unconscious thoughts, of “peel<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> onion”<br />

of our selves <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>rapy, of repressed or recovered memories which implies a<br />

place where <strong>the</strong> forgotten memories have been stored, held under <strong>the</strong> surface,<br />

hidden from our conscious self, which lies at <strong>the</strong> surface. Emig was not a Freudian<br />

scholar, <strong>and</strong> did not cite Freud <strong>in</strong> “The Uses of <strong>the</strong> Unconscious <strong>in</strong> Compos<strong>in</strong>g”<br />

(1964) so she was likely work<strong>in</strong>g with this popular underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong><br />

spatial division of <strong>the</strong> conscious <strong>and</strong> unconscious selves.<br />

Like Murray, who wanted to see a shift from <strong>the</strong> “exterior view” of composition<br />

to <strong>the</strong> “<strong>in</strong>terior view,” Emig argued that traditional writ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>struction<br />

doesn’t allow <strong>the</strong> student to “consult this [unconscious] part of <strong>the</strong> self” <strong>and</strong><br />

“conspires aga<strong>in</strong>st his <strong>in</strong>wardly attend<strong>in</strong>g” (1983, p. 46). She discusses how author<br />

Rudyard Kipl<strong>in</strong>g personified <strong>the</strong> “unconscious part of <strong>the</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g self <strong>in</strong>to<br />

daemons” (1983, p. 49) <strong>and</strong> how Amy Lowell described dropp<strong>in</strong>g a simple topic<br />

for a poem “<strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> subconscious much as one drops a letter <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> mailbox.<br />

Six months later … <strong>the</strong> poem … was ‘<strong>the</strong>re’’” (Lowell quoted <strong>in</strong> Emig, 1983, p.<br />

52). Writ<strong>in</strong>g teachers needed to encourage <strong>in</strong>ward attend<strong>in</strong>g—journeys to <strong>the</strong><br />

unconscious—if students were to write papers that went beyond (or below) <strong>the</strong><br />

“surface scrap<strong>in</strong>gs” produced by a traditional overemphasis on <strong>the</strong> surface of <strong>the</strong><br />

self—<strong>the</strong> control of <strong>the</strong> conscious m<strong>in</strong>d.<br />

Five years after Emig’s “The Uses of <strong>the</strong> Unconscious <strong>in</strong> Compos<strong>in</strong>g,” Murray<br />

would make his plea for <strong>the</strong> role of procrast<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> compos<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong><br />

grounds that procrast<strong>in</strong>ation allowed <strong>the</strong> subconscious to do its work. In Write<br />

Before Writ<strong>in</strong>g, he describes why writers procrast<strong>in</strong>ate:<br />

They sharpen well-po<strong>in</strong>ted pencils <strong>and</strong> go out to buy more<br />

blank paper, rearrange offices, w<strong>and</strong>er through libraries <strong>and</strong><br />

bookstores, chop wood, walk, drive, make unnecessary calls,<br />

179

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!