06.09.2021 Views

Critical Expressivism- Theory and Practice in the Composition Classroom, 2014a

Critical Expressivism- Theory and Practice in the Composition Classroom, 2014a

Critical Expressivism- Theory and Practice in the Composition Classroom, 2014a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Leake<br />

<strong>in</strong>tersubjective, social processes <strong>in</strong> shap<strong>in</strong>g reality. (1987, p.<br />

146)<br />

The role of language <strong>in</strong> this description adds a social element to what is<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rwise solipsistic. Language is <strong>the</strong> “shap<strong>in</strong>g” <strong>and</strong> “nurtur<strong>in</strong>g” element of <strong>the</strong><br />

private vision of that deeper <strong>in</strong>dividual. I am not as certa<strong>in</strong> as Berl<strong>in</strong> that <strong>in</strong>tersubjective<br />

<strong>and</strong> social processes are not already here <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> shap<strong>in</strong>g function of<br />

language. <strong>Critical</strong> empathy offers a way to employ <strong>the</strong> personal to <strong>in</strong>form <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>tersubjective <strong>and</strong> social. Indeed, <strong>the</strong> social qualities <strong>and</strong> question<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong><br />

personal <strong>in</strong> its assumptions <strong>and</strong> limitations is vital to <strong>the</strong> practice of critical empathy.<br />

This is what needs to be added to an expressivism as described by Berl<strong>in</strong>:<br />

more awareness <strong>and</strong> question<strong>in</strong>g of those social elements <strong>and</strong> an exam<strong>in</strong>ation of<br />

<strong>the</strong> relationships between <strong>the</strong> personal <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> social <strong>in</strong> form<strong>in</strong>g that not-quiteso-private<br />

underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g of o<strong>the</strong>rs as well as oneself.<br />

In this chapter I use <strong>the</strong>ories of perspective-tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> critical empathy to<br />

argue for a critical expressivism that moves beyond <strong>the</strong> limited personal that<br />

Berl<strong>in</strong> identified as common to expressionist rhetorics. Berl<strong>in</strong>’s characterizations<br />

are useful <strong>in</strong> provid<strong>in</strong>g a rough map of <strong>the</strong> historical discipl<strong>in</strong>ary terra<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

provid<strong>in</strong>g term<strong>in</strong>ology for discuss<strong>in</strong>g topographical differences. But an updated<br />

underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g of both critical expressivism <strong>and</strong> empathy provides a more<br />

accurate mapp<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> epistemological <strong>and</strong> rhetorical work of <strong>the</strong> personal.<br />

Some of <strong>the</strong>se features were already <strong>in</strong>herent <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> work of Elbow <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs, as<br />

Berl<strong>in</strong> notes. <strong>Critical</strong> empathy makes clearer <strong>the</strong> social <strong>and</strong> affective dimensions<br />

of a work<strong>in</strong>g critical expressivism. It calls for a critical voice that questions <strong>the</strong><br />

circumstances of its own speak<strong>in</strong>g. A critical expressivism, rooted here aga<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong> psychology <strong>and</strong> critical empathy, offers a social critique of that o<strong>the</strong>rwise<br />

personal voice, its privileges <strong>and</strong> assumptions, while recogniz<strong>in</strong>g that no voice<br />

is purely <strong>in</strong>dividual, just as no language is a language of one’s own. The vital<br />

questions asked <strong>in</strong> a critical empathy concern social relations, power differences,<br />

affective connections, <strong>and</strong> commonalities <strong>and</strong> differences. <strong>Critical</strong> expressivism<br />

through critical empathy fosters a voice that speaks <strong>in</strong> order to simultaneously<br />

ask <strong>the</strong>se questions. It uses knowledge of oneself—<strong>and</strong> an ongo<strong>in</strong>g critique of<br />

that knowledge—to better underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> communicate with o<strong>the</strong>rs about one<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> world.<br />

PERCEIVING SELF AND OTHER<br />

I beg<strong>in</strong> with <strong>the</strong>ories of identification <strong>and</strong> perspective-tak<strong>in</strong>g as a way to<br />

establish how processes of empathy are always concerned with <strong>the</strong> tensions <strong>and</strong><br />

questions of know<strong>in</strong>g about <strong>the</strong> self <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs. Personal knowledge, <strong>in</strong> this<br />

150

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!