Critical Expressivism- Theory and Practice in the Composition Classroom, 2014a
Critical Expressivism- Theory and Practice in the Composition Classroom, 2014a
Critical Expressivism- Theory and Practice in the Composition Classroom, 2014a
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
“Is it Possible to Teach Writ<strong>in</strong>g So That People Stop Kill<strong>in</strong>g Each O<strong>the</strong>r?”<br />
people are different, paradoxically, for <strong>the</strong> same reasons I am “myself”—because<br />
of personal experiences <strong>and</strong> a mix of socializ<strong>in</strong>g elements.<br />
Jonsberg thus follows O’Reilley, Blitz <strong>and</strong> Hurlbert, <strong>and</strong> Nelson <strong>in</strong> argu<strong>in</strong>g<br />
for a pedagogy that gives pride of place to <strong>the</strong> stories <strong>and</strong> voices of <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />
students, without <strong>in</strong> any way discount<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> importance of <strong>the</strong> social (that<br />
is, fellow students <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> teacher, but also <strong>the</strong> world at large). Below, I offer<br />
pedagogical possibilities <strong>in</strong> present<strong>in</strong>g a small toolbox of projects <strong>and</strong> practices<br />
that might aid <strong>the</strong> composition <strong>in</strong>structor <strong>in</strong>spired by nonviolent pr<strong>in</strong>ciples. But<br />
first I want to po<strong>in</strong>t out ano<strong>the</strong>r of Jonsberg’s arguments that highlights a second<br />
key commonality <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> work of many compositionists of nonviolence. Jonsberg<br />
suggests provocatively that “WHAT we teach doesn’t matter half so much as<br />
HOW we teach it. WHO we are, what values we model, has far more effect on<br />
our students than <strong>the</strong> words <strong>the</strong>y may read or hear” (2000, p. 28). For Jonsberg,<br />
a posture of absolute respect <strong>and</strong> acceptance on <strong>the</strong> teacher’s part is critical; she<br />
strives for a classroom where “all members are welcome <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fullness of <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
be<strong>in</strong>g” (2000, p. 30). Nelson’s valuation of deep listen<strong>in</strong>g seems to arise from a<br />
similar place. O’Reilley bluntly argues that <strong>the</strong> “adversarial stance” (1993, p. 30)<br />
of many traditional teach<strong>in</strong>g methods leads to “academic brutalization” (1993,<br />
p. 31), <strong>and</strong> that <strong>the</strong> little th<strong>in</strong>gs we do matter, down to our comments on student<br />
papers: “rude <strong>and</strong> demoraliz<strong>in</strong>g label<strong>in</strong>g of student work” is one example of<br />
how students are “<strong>in</strong>sulted, bullied, <strong>and</strong> turned <strong>in</strong>to objects,” plant<strong>in</strong>g “seeds of<br />
violence. It follows, <strong>the</strong>refore, that <strong>the</strong> first step <strong>in</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>g peace is to exam<strong>in</strong>e<br />
<strong>the</strong> ways <strong>in</strong> which we are already teach<strong>in</strong>g conflict” (O’Reilley, 1993, p. 31).<br />
TEACHERLY REFLECTION<br />
But how can we conduct such an exam<strong>in</strong>ation? O’Reilley’s <strong>and</strong> Blitz <strong>and</strong><br />
Hurlbert’s longer texts po<strong>in</strong>t toward an answer: as teachers we should reflect<br />
with seriousness <strong>and</strong> honesty on our own lives, consider<strong>in</strong>g how <strong>the</strong>y connect<br />
to <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>fluence what we do <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> classroom. Blitz <strong>and</strong> Hurlbert claim <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
<strong>in</strong>troductory chapter that “writ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>g are not separable.<br />
As you will see, our lives are <strong>in</strong> this composition [Letters for <strong>the</strong> Liv<strong>in</strong>g] as our<br />
students’ lives are <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir compositions” (1998, p. 2). And <strong>in</strong>deed, even though<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir book is overwhelm<strong>in</strong>gly focused on <strong>the</strong>ir experiences with <strong>the</strong>ir writ<strong>in</strong>g<br />
students, a reader also witnesses <strong>the</strong> two teachers wrestle with fears for <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
own children; relate stories of troubled visits to dy<strong>in</strong>g hometowns; <strong>and</strong> recall<br />
quiet moments when <strong>the</strong>y sat peacefully as friends, star<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> night. These<br />
details are offered not gratuitously but as part <strong>and</strong> parcel of Blitz <strong>and</strong> Hurlbert’s<br />
project of wonder<strong>in</strong>g how <strong>the</strong>y might help <strong>the</strong>ir composition students navigate<br />
violent l<strong>and</strong>scapes; one gets <strong>the</strong> impression that <strong>the</strong>se teachers are better able to<br />
135