Critical Expressivism- Theory and Practice in the Composition Classroom, 2014a
Critical Expressivism- Theory and Practice in the Composition Classroom, 2014a
Critical Expressivism- Theory and Practice in the Composition Classroom, 2014a
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Multicultural <strong>Critical</strong> Pedagogy <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Community-Based <strong>Classroom</strong><br />
semesters fundamentally changed <strong>the</strong> overall scope of my classroom <strong>and</strong> context.<br />
Never<strong>the</strong>less, to get a sense of what all students wrote for all key assignments before<br />
hon<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> on just two terms, I entered extended excerpts from 266 student<br />
essays so that I could sort <strong>and</strong> review <strong>the</strong> content of <strong>the</strong>ir texts by assignment. I<br />
<strong>the</strong>n created cod<strong>in</strong>g categories based on Thomas Newkirk’s work on performative<br />
responses, <strong>and</strong> Rochelle Harris’ concept of <strong>in</strong>ductive “emergent moments;”<br />
I <strong>the</strong>n noted all references to race as this was central to my sense of a multicultural<br />
critical pedagogy. I subsequently re-analyzed student essays to look for specific<br />
features <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se areas <strong>and</strong> entered <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong>to 342 new data fields.<br />
I touch upon <strong>the</strong> specifics of this <strong>in</strong>tense process of data cod<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> analysis<br />
because of two driv<strong>in</strong>g rationales that underlie my study. First, I wanted to<br />
conduct an analysis that went beyond a <strong>the</strong>oretical debate about <strong>the</strong> efficacy of<br />
personal writ<strong>in</strong>g versus academic writ<strong>in</strong>g, especially as it relates to <strong>the</strong> multicultural<br />
course goal. Secondly, I wanted to look at <strong>the</strong> impact of an enactment of<br />
critical pedagogy given what <strong>in</strong>structors actually have at <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> term—<br />
students’ writ<strong>in</strong>g—aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> temporality of a college semester. It might not be<br />
possible over <strong>the</strong> course of a fifteen-week term to see <strong>the</strong> emergence of a student<br />
version of a Nelson M<strong>and</strong>ela or César Chávez. What is more likely to occur is<br />
social change at <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>cremental level as “small, fleet<strong>in</strong>g, [<strong>and</strong>] local” moments”<br />
that represent <strong>the</strong> t<strong>in</strong>ker<strong>in</strong>g of progress <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> lives of both teachers <strong>and</strong> students<br />
(Gallagher, 2002, p. 87).<br />
Given <strong>the</strong> site of my study—<strong>the</strong> Greater Detroit area—I recognized that <strong>the</strong><br />
exploration of issues of race <strong>and</strong> place issues could not be fully unpacked with<strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> scope of a s<strong>in</strong>gle semester. The narratives of negativity about Detroit <strong>and</strong> its<br />
African-American residents are deeply entrenched, <strong>and</strong> it was not easy for students<br />
to discard <strong>in</strong>gra<strong>in</strong>ed messages. Still, <strong>the</strong> process of construct<strong>in</strong>g personal<br />
texts about such prevail<strong>in</strong>g negative sentiments opened up <strong>the</strong> possibility of <strong>in</strong>cremental<br />
changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> students’ perceptions of <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r. I contend that <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
racialized narratives allowed <strong>the</strong> students to create critical distances between<br />
<strong>the</strong>mselves <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir constructed beliefs <strong>in</strong> such a way that those beliefs became<br />
open for <strong>in</strong>vestigation <strong>and</strong> potential change. As Patricia Web Boyd claims <strong>in</strong> her<br />
chapter <strong>in</strong> this collection, “students need to beg<strong>in</strong> with <strong>the</strong>ir own experiences <strong>in</strong><br />
order to be active participants <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> larger society.” Their experiential, personal<br />
texts provided <strong>the</strong>m with opportunities “to see how <strong>the</strong> personal already <strong>in</strong>tersects<br />
with <strong>and</strong> is embedded with<strong>in</strong> cultural narratives, to study how <strong>the</strong>ir texts<br />
write <strong>the</strong>m as <strong>the</strong>y write <strong>the</strong> texts, <strong>and</strong> to underst<strong>and</strong> how <strong>the</strong>y name <strong>the</strong> world<br />
around <strong>the</strong>m” (Harris, 2004, p. 405). As an assent to <strong>the</strong> Freirean claim that <strong>the</strong><br />
world must be named before it can be changed (2003, p. 88), <strong>the</strong> study <strong>in</strong> this<br />
chapter <strong>in</strong>vestigates how personal writ<strong>in</strong>g helped students name <strong>the</strong>ir struggles<br />
with border cross<strong>in</strong>g as part of <strong>the</strong> community-based program.<br />
265