Critical Expressivism- Theory and Practice in the Composition Classroom, 2014a
Critical Expressivism- Theory and Practice in the Composition Classroom, 2014a
Critical Expressivism- Theory and Practice in the Composition Classroom, 2014a
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Reread<strong>in</strong>g Romanticism, Reread<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Expressivism</strong><br />
ories of imag<strong>in</strong>ation (1995, p. 38) <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ways romantics <strong>the</strong>orized education<br />
(“<strong>the</strong> importance of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual; <strong>the</strong> importance of personal experience;<br />
<strong>and</strong> an emphasis on activity as opposed to passivity” (1995, p. 36)). Like Grad<strong>in</strong>,<br />
I turn back to a familiar romantic, William Wordsworth, but with a different<br />
goal. In <strong>the</strong>ories of language from <strong>the</strong> period <strong>and</strong> from <strong>the</strong> p<strong>in</strong>nacle statement<br />
on language <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> period, Wordsworth’s Preface(s) <strong>and</strong> Appendix to Lyrical<br />
Ballads, I question <strong>the</strong> easy assumption that romantic-expressivist language is<br />
thought to emanate from <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terior of <strong>the</strong> unique, isolated <strong>in</strong>dividual. Instead,<br />
<strong>the</strong> Prefaces suggest that language <strong>and</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g is found <strong>in</strong> of <strong>the</strong> sensuous world<br />
of physical experience. Follow<strong>in</strong>g Fishman <strong>and</strong> Berl<strong>in</strong>’s read<strong>in</strong>g of Coleridge,<br />
depth <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>sight can come from careful micro-focused read<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
In order to glean from Wordsworth’s Prefaces a novel way of underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
romantic expression, it’s helpful to contextualize his work <strong>in</strong> conversations about<br />
language’s orig<strong>in</strong>s popular <strong>in</strong> this period. In <strong>the</strong> eighteenth century, language<br />
became a philosophical “problem.” Inquiries <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong> of<br />
language, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> relationship of physical, worldly th<strong>in</strong>gs to language, accumulated.<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Hans Aarsleff, “language study” <strong>in</strong> this period “even<br />
when called philology,” was not merely a matter of know<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> forms, syntax,<br />
phonology, historical relationships, <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r aspects of particular languages. It<br />
<strong>in</strong>volved questions of wider significance. What, for <strong>in</strong>stance, was <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong> of<br />
thought? Did <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d have a material basis? Did mank<strong>in</strong>d have a s<strong>in</strong>gle orig<strong>in</strong>?<br />
(1967, p. 4). Considerations of language <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> romantic period were also an<br />
opportunity to consider m<strong>in</strong>d, thought, be<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> knowledge. In <strong>the</strong>se <strong>the</strong>ories,<br />
many hypo<strong>the</strong>sized a physical, embodied basis for language <strong>in</strong> early human<br />
<strong>in</strong>teractions <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>teractions with <strong>the</strong> physical environment. 2 This broad sense<br />
that language has physical <strong>and</strong> material bases, provides <strong>the</strong> central premise of<br />
<strong>the</strong> work of Horne Tooke, <strong>the</strong> most important <strong>and</strong> popular language <strong>the</strong>orist<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> period, to advance what would become a popular (Aarsleff, 1967, p. 73),<br />
provok<strong>in</strong>g, lightn<strong>in</strong>g-rod text.<br />
Tooke’s Diversions of Purley published first <strong>in</strong> 1786, reissued <strong>in</strong> 1798 <strong>and</strong><br />
released with a second volume <strong>in</strong> 1805 (dates which correspond with Romanticism’s<br />
heyday) posits <strong>the</strong> most simplified version of language which argues<br />
that both language’s orig<strong>in</strong>s <strong>and</strong> contemporary language systems are based <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> material world. Completely underm<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g arbitrar<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>and</strong> fully embrac<strong>in</strong>g<br />
empiricist sensation, Tooke’s “l<strong>in</strong>guistic materialism” (McKusick, 1986, p. 12)<br />
deploys elaborate etymologies to show how words are immediately <strong>the</strong> signs<br />
of material th<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>and</strong> concepts or what he calls “abbreviations” of <strong>the</strong>m. Says<br />
Aarsleff, “Nam<strong>in</strong>g is <strong>the</strong> essence of language as Tooke had shown by trac<strong>in</strong>g all<br />
words via etymology to <strong>the</strong> names of sensible objects” (1967, p. 94). Etymological<br />
analysis shows how parts <strong>in</strong> words correspond to <strong>the</strong> way we associate our<br />
207