18.01.2013 Views

KITCHENS AND DINING ROOMS AT POMPEII ... - Get a Free Blog

KITCHENS AND DINING ROOMS AT POMPEII ... - Get a Free Blog

KITCHENS AND DINING ROOMS AT POMPEII ... - Get a Free Blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

that I fear that you will cause me damage, I think your giving security against<br />

threatened damage should suffice. 95<br />

The mere potential of a fire, based on the location of a person's oven (it is not clear if the furnus is<br />

for bath, industrial, or kitchen use, but it presumably does not matter) is enough to warrant<br />

security against damage. In addition, Ulpian makes a distinction between a furnus and a focus.<br />

While Proculus' original opinion legally equates a focus and a furnus as simply being locations<br />

where a live fire is kept, Ulpian seems to think that a furnus, with its larger size and greater heat<br />

output, offers a greater danger that deserves additional security.<br />

Fire produced smoke, and smoke was an inconvenience for both residents and neighbors.<br />

The use of charcoal reduced, but did not eliminate, the need for ventilation. Windows and doors<br />

provided some venting, especially if a kitchen was adjacent to the street or an open area such as a<br />

peristyle or garden. A few kitchens were provided with built chimneys or pierced tiles to allow<br />

smoke to escape through the roof. 96 The fumes had simply to be endured; there were no legal<br />

precepts regulating smoke from private property:<br />

A doubt is raised by Pomponius in the forty-first book of his Readings, as to<br />

whether a man can bring an action alleging that he has a right or that another has<br />

no right to create a moderate amount of smoke on his own premises, for<br />

example, smoke from a hearth ( ex foco). He says that the better opinion is that<br />

such an action cannot be brought, just as an action cannot be brought to maintain<br />

that one has a right to light a fire or wash on one's own land. 97<br />

95 Ulp. dig. 9.2.27.10: Si furnum secundum parietem communem haberes, an damni iniuria tenearis? Et ait Proculus<br />

agi non posse, quia nec cum eo qui focum haberet: et ideo aequius puto in factum actionem dandam, scilicet si paries<br />

exustus sit: sin autem nondum mihi damnum dederis, sed ita ignem habeas, ut metuam, ne mihi damnum des, damni<br />

infecti puto sufficere cautionem (Watson 1985 text and translation).<br />

96 Salza Prina Ricotti 1978/80, 253-256. For example, perforated roof-tiles were found stored in garden (23)<br />

of the Casa del Efebo (I.7.10-12)(PPM I, 712, fig. 163). A pierced roof tile probably belonged to the small<br />

shed roof over the stove of kitchen (5) in Casa I.10.1. The roof tile now rests on top of the stove.<br />

97 Ulp. dig. 8.5.8.6: Apud Pomponium dubitatur libro quadragensimo primo lectionum, an quis possit ita agere licere<br />

fumum non gravem, puta ex foco, in suo facere aut non licere. Et ait magis non posse agi, sicut agi non potest ius esse<br />

in suo ignem facere aut sedere aut lavere (Watson 1985 text and translation).<br />

76

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!