18.01.2013 Views

KITCHENS AND DINING ROOMS AT POMPEII ... - Get a Free Blog

KITCHENS AND DINING ROOMS AT POMPEII ... - Get a Free Blog

KITCHENS AND DINING ROOMS AT POMPEII ... - Get a Free Blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

participate in a meal, and how easily cooking areas can be supplied with foodstuffs purchased in<br />

the city. Proximity (distance in meters) and accessibility (distance in terms of the number of<br />

distinct spaces passed through) are discussed together because they provide parallel results,<br />

being different measurements of the same phenomena. Only fixed cooking areas (i.e. kitchens<br />

and hearths) in (work)shop-houses, diners and houses are included in the discussion. 207<br />

There is an obvious and direct relationship between the size of a building and the<br />

distances from the kitchen and dining area to the front entrance (see Table 3.5 below).<br />

Building type Avg. distance,<br />

fixed cooking<br />

area to front<br />

door<br />

Avg. # of spaces<br />

from fixed<br />

cooking area to<br />

front door<br />

Avg. distance,<br />

dining area to<br />

front door<br />

Diner 7.6 m. 2.9 9.6 m. 3.6<br />

(Work)shop-house 12.5 m. 3.9 11.0 m. 4.0<br />

Casa piccola 14.6 m. 5.1 15.3 m. 5.0<br />

Casa media 18.0 m. 4.9 20.7 m. 5.5<br />

Casa grande 27.3 m. 6.2 32.8 m. 6.3<br />

166<br />

Avg. # of spaces<br />

from dining area<br />

to front door<br />

Table 3.5: Comparison of the average distance and average number of spaces to the front door of<br />

a building from fixed cooking areas and dining areas according to building category. Distance to<br />

the entrance increases as building size increases, and cooking areas are located slightly closer to<br />

the front door than are dining areas.<br />

This suggests that large houses are essentially expanded or stretched-out versions of smaller<br />

houses, and the basic layout and relationships between cooking and dining areas remains stable<br />

even as the distances increase between them.<br />

Kitchens are consistently located slightly closer to the front entrance (in distance and<br />

number of spaces) than dining areas (see Table 3.5 above). The difference is not large, and is<br />

probably due to the fact that (in houses) fixed cooking areas are rarely located at the very back of<br />

a building, but dining areas often are, as they face onto a back garden or peristyle, far from the<br />

front door. 208 In diners, hearths are usually located at the front of the building, where they can<br />

serve customers on the street and in the dining area behind.<br />

Guests who attended dinners at larger houses had to penetrate further inside in order to<br />

dine. In the casa piccola, there was a single dining area, near the atrium. In the casa media, there<br />

207 Portable braziers and cooking stands could be moved anywhere cooking was needed. (Work)shops and<br />

lunch counters do not contain both distinct kitchens or dining areas, and are not discussed. In (work)shops,<br />

the distance between cooking and dining areas was essentially negligible; customers of lunch counters are<br />

assumed to have eaten at the counter or on the street.<br />

208 (Work)shop-houses do not seem to conform to this trend, because kitchen (m) in the Fullonica di<br />

Stephanus I.6.7 is located in the back corner of the house, far from the dining area (g) off the atrium, and the<br />

high figure of its distance from the front entrance skews the average. If this (work)shop-house is removed<br />

from the data, the average distance from fixed cooking areas to the door drops to 9.8 m.; dining areas remain<br />

steady at 11.1 m. from the door, and the pattern holds.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!